Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Open Globe Injury in Children

Pages
77–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The principal predictor for a good visual outcome was found to be initial bestcorrectedVA over 20/200.Conclusion: To predict the prognosis in the best way, every patient with OGI should be carefully evaluated both at the time of admission andduring the follow-up period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate retrospectively the epidemiologic data and outcomes of pediatric open globe injury (OGI).Materials and Methods: The medical records of all pediatric cases (<16 years old) diagnosed with OGI in İzmir Katip Çelebi University AtatürkTeaching and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology between January 2009 and December 2018 were screened.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Age, sex, history, causeof trauma, treatment received, visual acuity (VA) at presentation, and final VA were recorded.Results: A total of 48 patients were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The principal predictor for a good visual outcome was found to be initial bestcorrectedVA over 20/200.Conclusion: To predict the prognosis in the best way, every patient with OGI should be carefully evaluated both at the time of admission andduring the follow-up period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: To evaluate retrospectively the epidemiologic data and outcomes of pediatric open globe injury (OGI).Materials and Methods: The medical records of all pediatric cases (<16 years old) diagnosed with OGI in İzmir Katip Çelebi University AtatürkTeaching and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology between January 2009 and December 2018 were screened. Age, sex, history, causeof trauma, treatment received, visual acuity (VA) at presentation, and final VA were recorded.Results: A total of 48 patients were included in this study. The mean age at the time of injury was 10.72±4.74 years, ranging from 1 to 16 years.Game-related accidents were the most common cause of all pediatric OGI patients with a frequency of 58.3% (n=28). Of the OGIs 56.3%(n=27) were in zone I, followed by zone II (39.5%; n=19), and zone III (4.2%; n=2). Patients with vitreous hemorrhage or retinal detachment atadmission were found to have a higher risk of poor prognosis. The principal predictor for a good visual outcome was found to be initial bestcorrectedVA over 20/200.Conclusion: To predict the prognosis in the best way, every patient with OGI should be carefully evaluated both at the time of admission andduring the follow-up period.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATİK, S. Ş. (2020). Open Globe Injury in Children. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 77–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/362876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Batur M, Seven E, Akaltun MN, Tekin S, Yasar T. Epidemiology of Open Globe Injury in Children. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:1976-81
  2. Sahin Atik S, Ugurlu S, Egrilmez ED. Open Globe Injury: Demographic and Clinical Features. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:628- 31
  3. Knyazer B, Bilenko N, Levy J, et al. Open globe eye injury characteristics and prognostic factors in southern Israel: a retrospective epidemiologic review of 10 years experience. Isr Med Assoc J 2013;15:158-62
  4. Schrader WF. Open globe injuries: epidemiological study of two eye clinics in Germany, 1981-1999. Croat Med J 2004;45:268-74
  5. Casson RJ, Walker JC, Newland HS. Four-year review of open eye injuries at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;30:15-8
  6. Lesniak SP, Bauza A, Son JH, et al. Twelve-year review of pediatric traumatic open globe injuries in an urban U.S. population. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2012;49:73-9
  7. Choovuthayakorn J, Patikulsila P, Patikulsila D, Watanachai N, Pimolrat W. Characteristics and outcomes of pediatric open globe injury. Int Ophthalmol 2014;34:839-44
  8. Behbehani AM, Lotfy N, Ezzdean H, Albader S, Kamel M, Abul N. Open eye injuries in the pediatric population in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2002;11:183-9
  9. Schörkhuber MM, Schneider MR, Riedl R, Wackernagel W, Brandner M, Wedrich A. Gender differences in open globe injuries in children. Spektrum Augenheilkd 2013;27:305–10
  10. Sari A, Adiguzel U, Dinc E, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of childhood penetrating eye injuries. Turk J Ophthalmol 2008;38:504–9
  11. Soylu M, Demircan N, Yalaz M, Işigüzel I. Etiology of pediatric perforating eye injuries in southern Turkey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5:7-12
  12. Lee C-H, Lee L, Kao L-Y, Lin K-K, Yang M-L. Prognostic indicators of open globe injuries in children. Am J Emerg Med 2009;27:530- 5
  13. Bunting H, Stephens D, Mireskandari K. Prediction of visual outcomes after open globe injury in children: a 17-year Canadian experience. J AAPOS 2013;17:43-8
  14. Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, Mester V, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. The ocular trauma score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2002;15:163-5, vi
  15. Schörkhuber MM, Wackernagel W, Riedl R, Schneider MR, Wedrich A. Ocular trauma scores in paediatric open globe injuries. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98:664-8.