Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Pseudoexfoliation Sydrome

Tek Taraflı Psödoeksfolyasyon Sendromlu Olgularda Ön Segment Parametrelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
147–150
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although intraocular pressure values in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome were significantly higher in unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndromepatients, there was no statistically significant difference in anterior segment parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure and anterior segment parameters in patients with unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Of the 32 volunteers with unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome included in the study, 20 were female and 12 were male.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although intraocular pressure values in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome were significantly higher in unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndromepatients, there was no statistically significant difference in anterior segment parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure and anterior segment parameters in patients with unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Material and Method: Patients who appealed to the ophthalmology outpatient department and who had pseudoexfoliation syndrome in one eye were included in the study. Intraocular pressure values of patients without additional eye disease and systemic disease were measured by applanation tonometer. In addition to complete ophthalmologic examination, anterior segment parameters such as central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, iridocorneal angle, and pupil size were measured with a Sirius anterior segment imaging device. Axial lengths were recorded. Results: Of the 32 volunteers with unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome included in the study, 20 were female and 12 were male. The mean age was 66.34±6.15 years. Mean intraocular pressure values of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome eyes 16.69±3.73 mmHg, while, in normal eyes 14.84±2.77 mmHg was found (p=0.029). Compared to the normal eye, central corneal thickness was found to be 544.50±38.15 μm in the pseudoexfoliation syndrome eye and 542.56±35.90 μm in the normal eye (p=0.83). With the same comparison, the anterior chamber depth was 3.18 ± 0.36 mm and 3.16±0.34 mm (p=0.77); anterior chamber volume 122.41±27.37 microL and 121.81±25.39 microline (p=0.93); iridocorneal angle 38.06±6.6° and 37.97±5.80° (p=0.95); axial length 22.99±0.77 mm and 22.95 ±0.76 mm (p=0.85); and the mean pupil size was 2.63±0.43 mm and 2.69±0.42 mm (p=0.70), respectively . Conclusion: Although intraocular pressure values in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome were significantly higher in unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndromepatients, there was no statistically significant difference in anterior segment parameters.

Özet

Amaç: Tek taraflı psödoeksfolyasyon sendromu olan olguların göz içi basıncı ve ön segment parametrelerinin psödoeksfolyasyon send - romu olmayan gözle karşılaştırılması. Gereç ve Yöntem: Göz polikliniğine başvuran ve tek gözünde psödoeksfolyasyon sendromu olan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Ek göz hastalığı ve sistemik hastalığı olmayan hastaların göz içi basıncı değerleri aplanasyon tonometre ile ölçüldü. Tam oftalmolojik muayeneye ek olarak santral kornea kalınlığı, ön kamara derinliği, ön kamara volümü, iridokorneal açı ve pupil boyutu gibi ön segment parametreleri sirius ön segment görüntüleme cihazı ile ölçüldü. Aksiyel uzunlukları kaydedildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen, tek taraflı psödoeksfolyasyon sendromu olan 32 gönüllünün 20’si kadın 12’si erkekti. Yaş ortalaması 66,34±6,15 olarak hesaplandı. Hastaların ortalama göz içi basıncı değeri psödoeksfolyasyon sendromlu gözlerde 16,69±3,73 mmHg iken, normal gözlerde 14,84±2,77 mmHg olarak bulundu (p=0,029). Psödoeksfolyasyon sendromlu göz ile normal göz karşılaştırıldığında ortalama santral kornea kalınlığı psödoeksfolyasyon sendromlu gözde 544,50±38,15 μm iken normal gözde 542,56±35,90 μm (p=0,83) saptandı. Aynı karşılaştırma ile ortalama ön kamara derinliği 3,18±0,36 mm ve 3,16±0,34 mm (p=0,77), ortalama ön kamara volümü 122,41±27,37 microL ve 121,81±25,39 microL (p=0,93), ortalama iridokorneal açı 38,06±6,6° ve 37,97±5,80° (p=0,95), aksiyel uzunluk 22,99±0,77 mm ve 22,95±0,76 mm (p=0,85), ortalama pupil boyutu 2,63±0,43 mm ve 2,69±0,42 mm (p=0,70) olarak belirlendi. Sonuç: Tek taraflı psödoeksfolyasyon sendromu olan hastalarda psödoeksfolyasyon sendromlu gözlerde göz içi basıncı değeri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulunmasına rağmen ön segment parametrelerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATİK, S. Ş. (2020). Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Pseudoexfoliation Sydrome. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 147–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/295347

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Linderg JG. Clinical investigations on depigmentation of the pupillary border and translucency of the iris in cases of senile cataract and in normal eyes in elderly persons. Acta Ophthalmol. 1989;190:1-96
  2. Mitchell P. Wang JJ. Hourihan F. The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: the Blue Mountains eye study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(10):1319-24
  3. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Von der Mark K, Sakai LY, et al. Increased extracellular deposition of fibrillin-containing fibrils in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38(5):970-84
  4. Morrison JC. Green WR. Light microscopy of the exfoliation syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol.1988;184:5-27
  5. Jeng SM. Karger RA. Hodge DO. Burke JP. Johnson DH. Good MS. The risk of glaucoma in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(1):117-21
  6. Ritch R. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. Exfoliation syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;45(4):265-315
  7. Ritch R. Ocular and systemic manifestations of exfoliation syndrome. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(8 Suppl 1):S1-8
  8. İrkeç M. Senil psödoeksfoliasyonun epidemiyolojik özellikleri üze rine klinik, immünolojik ve histokimyasal bir inceleme. Hacettepe Üni Tıp Fak. Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı, Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara; 1978
  9. Arıtürk N. Oge I. Yücel OE. Exfoliation syndrome in middle east and black sea area of Turkey. In: 5th International Glaucoma Symposium- IGS Final Program and Book of Abstracts. 2005; A 72
  10. Çumurcu T. Kılıç R. Yoloğlu S. The frequency of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in the middle Black Sea region of Turkey. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20(6):1007-1011
  11. Chylack LT Jr. Leske MC. McCarthy D. Khu P. Kashiwagi T. Sperduto R. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(7):991-7 12. Ozaki M. Mechanisms of Glaucoma in Exfoliation Syndrome. J Glaucoma 2018;27(Supp 1):83-6
  12. Crandall AS. Exfoliation Syndrome and Cataract Surgery. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(Supp 1):102-4 14. Zheng X. Sakai H. Goto T. et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography analysis of clinically unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome: evidence of bilateral involvement and morphologic factors related to asymmetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5679-84
  13. Elgin U. Şen E. Şimşek T. Tekin K. Yılmazbaş P. Primer Açık Açılı Glokom ve Psödoeksfolyatif Glokomlu Olgularda Katarakt Cerrahisinin Ön Segment Parametreleri Üzerine Olan Erken Dö - nem Etkileri. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016;46(3):95-8
  14. Zengin MO. Karahan E. Tuncer İ. Çınar E. Küçüke