Journals / The Journal of Breast Health / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Molecular Classification of Breast Carcinoma: From Traditional, Old-Fashioned Way to A New Age, and A New Way

Pages
59–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, current molecular approaches are not yet used in routine clinical practice and treatment guidance since they are immature and can even lead to incorrect assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Breast carcinoma comprises a group of diseases with specific clinical, histopathologic and molecular properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Traditional classification use morphology to divide tumors into separate categories with differing behavior and prognosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, current molecular approaches are not yet used in routine clinical practice and treatment guidance since they are immature and can even lead to incorrect assessment.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Breast carcinoma comprises a group of diseases with specific clinical, histopathologic and molecular properties. Traditional classification use morphology to divide tumors into separate categories with differing behavior and prognosis. However, there are limitations of traditional classification systems, and new molecular methods are expected to improve classification systems. Molecular subtypes of breast carcinomas have been characterized in the last 11 years, and have been studied extensively. Much of the information accumulated in recent years, and molecular taxonomy seems to be still developing and undergoing change. The main question is whether new molecular techniques such as gene expression profiling will be accepted as gold standard in determining breast cancer subtypes, and whether molecular classification is useful in specific subtypes of breast cancer as it is in ductal carcinoma (nonspecific type). In addition, critical review of the literature reveals major problems such as poor definition, lack of reproducibility and lack of quality control in current molecular techniques and classifications. Therefore, current molecular approaches are not yet used in routine clinical practice and treatment guidance since they are immature and can even lead to incorrect assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELİYATKIN, N. Ö., YALÇIN, E., ZENGEL, B., AKTAŞ, S., VARDAR, E. (2015). Molecular Classification of Breast Carcinoma: From Traditional, Old-Fashioned Way to A New Age, and A New Way. The Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 59–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/362646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D.Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011
  2. (PMID: 21296855) [CrossRef] 2. Singletary SE, Connolly JL. Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin, 2006
  3. (PMID: 16449185) 3. Ellis IO, Cornelisse CJ, Schnitt SJ, Sasco AJ, Sastre-Garau X, Kaaks R. Invasive breast carcinomas. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003. p 13-19. 4. Weigelt, B. & Reis-Filho, J. S. Histological and molecular types of breast cancer: is there a unifying taxonomy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009
  4. (PMID: 19942925) [CrossRef] 5. Buerger H, Otterbach F, Simon R, Schäfer KL, Poremba C, Diallo R, Brinkschmidt C, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Boecker W.Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes. J Pathol 1999
  5. (PMID: 10629552) [CrossRef] 6. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, Dabbs DJ, Decker T, Eusebi V, Fox SB, Ichihara S, Jacquemier J, Lakhani SR, Palacios J, Richardson AL, Schnitt SJ, Schmitt FC, Tan PH, Tse GM, Badve S, Ellis IO. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res 2010
  6. (PMID: 20804570) 7. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Combinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010
  7. (PMID: 20107892) [CrossRef] 8. Denoix PF. Nomenclature classification des cancers [in French]. Bull Inst Nat Hyg (Paris) 1952
  8. International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Geneva, Switzerland: International Union Against Cancer
  9. 1968 10. Veronesia U, Vialeb G, Rotmensza N, Goldhirscha. A Rethinking TNM: Breast cancer TNM classification for treatment decision-making and research The Breast 2006
  10. (PMID: 16473737) [CrossRef] 11. Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO. The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 1992
  11. (PMID: 1391987) [CrossRef] 12. Ravdin PM, Siminoff LA, Davis GJ, Mercer MB, Hewlett J, Gerson N, Parker HL. Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J J Clin Oncol 2001
  12. (PMID: 11181660) 13. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlim