Journals / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY AND ETHICS: From Society to Schools

Pages
120–127
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Its effects depend upon people’s decisions about development and use.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to discuss the ethical issues in education in terms of teachers, students, schools, and software companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Typically, the effects of technology are complex, hard to estimate accurately and likely to have different values for different people at different times.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Its effects depend upon people’s decisions about development and use.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discuss the ethical issues in education in terms of teachers, students, schools, and software companies. Recent growth of the internet and World Wide Web allows new developments in the way instructors transfer knowledge to their students. Technology is a new tool in education that constantly changes and offers new opportunities for teaching and learning. Even so, old habits are hard to change. Typically, the effects of technology are complex, hard to estimate accurately and likely to have different values for different people at different times. Its effects depend upon people’s decisions about development and use.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, B. (2008). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY AND ETHICS: From Society to Schools. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 120–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/362076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Berson, M. J.; Bersn, I. R., & Ralston, M. E. (1999). A response to “separating wheat from chaff”. Social Education, 63(3), 160-161.
  2. Bodi, S. (1998). Ethics and information technology: some principles to guide students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24(6), p.469. http://www.ebscohost.com
  3. Callister, T. A. Jr. & Burbules, N. C. (2004). Just give it to me straight: A case against filtering the internet. Phi Delta Kappan, 85 (9), p648. Computer Ethics Institute. A project of the Brookings Institution. http://www.brook.edu/its/cei/cei_hp.htm International Society for Technology in Education. Educational technology standards and performance indicators for all teachers. http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/t_stands.html
  4. McGrath, D. (2004). Equity Revisited. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(2), 36-39.
  5. Murray, D. E. (2000). Changing technologies, changing literacy communities? Language Learning and Technology, 4(2), 43-58.
  6. Peace, A. G., & Hartzel, K. S. (2002). Ethical concerns raised by the use of the internet in academia. Journal of Information Ethics, Fall, 2002, 17-32.
  7. Ribble, M. S. & Bailey, G. D. (2005). Developing ethical direction. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(7), 36-38.
  8. Simpson, C. (2004). Should I or shouldn’t I? An ethical Conundrum. Library Media Connection, October 2004, 18-21.
  9. Weisman, R. (2005). Harvard rejects 119 accused of hacking. The Boston Globe, March 8, 2005.