SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tıp Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Mini-open trigger finger release

Mini-açık tetik parmak gevşetmesi

Cemil ERTÜRK
MEHMET AKİF ALTAY
Ali Murat KALENDER
Pages
141–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Mini-open trigger finger release is a safe and simple procedure with satisfactory outcome.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate the mid-term results of the patients who do not respond to conservative measures and who are treated by mini-open release method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We performed mini-open release in 24 trigger fingers of 23 patients (18 females, 5 males; mean age 53 years; range 33-75 years) Results: Triggering and pain were eliminated in all after Mini-open release.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Mini-open trigger finger release is a safe and simple procedure with satisfactory outcome.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tetik parmak bozuklukları · Ortopedik işlemler · Ameliyat sonrası dönem

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the mid-term results of the patients who do not respond to conservative measures and who are treated by mini-open release method. Methods: We performed mini-open release in 24 trigger fingers of 23 patients (18 females, 5 males; mean age 53 years; range 33-75 years) Results: Triggering and pain were eliminated in all after Mini-open release. There were one superficial wound infection and one delayed wound healing due to postoperative hematoma. At latest follow-up after an average of 28 months (range 1535 months) there were no complications such as neuro-vascular or tendon injury or recurrencies. Conclusion: Mini-open trigger finger release is a safe and simple procedure with satisfactory outcome.

Özet

Amaç: Tetik parmak tanısıyla, konservatif yöntemlerle yanıt alınamayan olgularda mini–açık yöntemle gevşetme yapılan olguların orta dönem sonuçları değerlendirildi. Yöntem: 23 hastanın (18 kadın, 5 erkek; ort. Yaş 53; dağılım 33-75), 24 tetik parmağına mini-açık yöntemle gevşetme uygulandı. Bulgular: Mini-açık gevşetme sonu parmaklardaki ağrı ve kilitlenme tümüyle geçti. Ameliyat sonu erken dönemde bir olguda yüzeyel yara infeksiyonu, bir olguda ise ameliyat sonu hematoma bağlı yara iyileşmesi gecikmesi saptandı. Ortalama 28 ay (15-35) izlem sonu hiçbir hastada nörovasküler ve tendon yaralanmasına ait komplikasyon ve nüks görülmedi. Sonuç: Mini-açık tetik parmak gevşetmesi güvenli, kolay ve tatmin edici bir girişimdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTÜRK, C., ALTAY, M. A., KALENDER, A. M. (2009). Mini-open trigger finger release. Tıp Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 141–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/361668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Wolfe SW. Tenosynovitis. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Wolfe SW. eds. Green’s operative hand surgery. Vol. 2, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 2137-58
  2. Karpal tünel, unlar tünel ve stenozan tenosinovit, In: Campbell’s operative ortopaedics. !0. basım Türkçe baskı
  3. Cilt. Çeviri editörü: Akgün I. İstanbul: Hayat Tıp Kitapçılık;2007.s. 3761-78
  4. Rosen B, Lundborg G. A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve repair. J Hand Surg (Am) 2000;25:535-43
  5. Turowski GA, Zdankiewicz PD, Thomson JG. The results of surgical treatment of trigger finger. J Hand Surg (Am) 1997;22:145-9
  6. Lange-Rieß D, Schuh R, Hönle W, Schuh A. Long-term results of surgical release of trigger thumb in adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; Jan 6. www. springerlink.com / index/q3072r83747054x3.pdf DOI 10.1007 / s00402-008-0802-8
  7. Ertem K, İnan M, Coşkun H, Bora A. Minimal açık insizyonla gevşetme yapılan tetik parmaklı hastalardaki cerrahi tedavi sonuçlarımız.İnönü Üniv Tıp Fak.Derg. 2003; 10 (1) 11-3
  8. Işıkan UE. Trigger thumb in infants: surgical treatment. Turkish Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1999;Vol. 4 Num. 1-2:37-40
  9. Eastwood DM, Gupta KJ, Johnson DP. Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: an office procedure. J Hand Surg (Am) 1992;17:114-7
  10. Cihantimur B, Akin S, Ozcan M. Percutaneous treatment of trigger finger. 34 finger followed 0.5-2 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:167-8
  11. Kılıç BA, Kıter E, Selçuk Y. Tetik parmak tedavisinde perkütan cerrahi girişimin normal. anatomik yapılara etkisi ve uzun dönem sonuçları. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2002;36:256-58
  12. Cebesoy O, Kose KC, Baltaci ET, Isik M. Percutaneous release of the trigger thumb: is it safe, cheap and effective? Int Orthop 2007;31:345–349 12. Heithoff SJ, Millender LH, Helman J. Bowstringing as a complication of trigger finger release. J Hand Surg (Am) 1988;13:567-70
  13. Carrozzella J, Stern PJ, Von Kuster LC. Transection of radial digital nerve of the thumb during trigger release. J Hand Surg (Am) 1989;14(2 Pt 1):198-200
  14. Bain GI, Turnbull J, Charles MN, Roth JH, Richards RS. Percutaneous A1 pulley release: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg (Am) 1995;20:781-4
  15. Bain GI, Wallwork NA. Percutaneous A1 pulley release-a clinical study. Hand Surg 1999;4:45-50
  16. Buldu H, Çepel S, Kır N, Ağrıtmış H. Başparmak tetik parmak gevşetmelerinde olası komplikasyonlardan kaçınma yolları: Kadavra çalışması. Acta Orthop Traumatol Tur