(A DISCUSSION IN THE LIGHT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL DECISIONS OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SUPERVISORY COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATION BY VIRTUE OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE IN PRIVATE HOSPITALS)
İDARİ YARGI KARARLARI IŞIĞINDA ÖZEL HASTANELERDE MEYDANA GELEN TIBBİ UYGULAMA HATASINDAN İDARENİN DENETİM YETKİSİ NEDENİYLE SORUMLULUĞUNUN TARTIŞILMASI
If a link is established between the damage occured in the private hospital while performing this task and the negligence of the administration not fulfilling the said responsibility, then a compensation will be disbursed.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is apparent that the responsibility of supervision and survellience obligation of administration continues while the natural person to whom health service is given by virtue of licencing perform the very task, because administration is the legal primary proprietor of this task.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is apparent that the responsibility of supervision and survellience obligation of administration continues while the natural person to whom health service is given by virtue of licencing perform the very task, because administration is the legal primary proprietor of this task.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If a link is established between the damage occured in the private hospital while performing this task and the negligence of the administration not fulfilling the said responsibility, then a compensation will be disbursed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
It is apparent that the responsibility of supervision and survellience obligation of administration continues while the natural person to whom health service is given by virtue of licencing perform the very task, because administration is the legal primary proprietor of this task. If a link is established between the damage occured in the private hospital while performing this task and the negligence of the administration not fulfilling the said responsibility, then a compensation will be disbursed.
Özet
Sağlık hizmetinin asil sahibi olan idarenin, ruhsat yöntemi ile bu hizmeti özel kişiye gördürmesi sırasında elbette denetim ve gözetim sorumluluğu devam etmektedir. Bu sorumluluğun yerine getirilmemesi özel hastanede meydana gelen zarar ile ilişkilenebiliyor ise bu durumda idarenin zararı tazmin sorumluluğundan söz edilecektir.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÇINARLI, S. (2016). (A DISCUSSION IN THE LIGHT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL DECISIONS OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SUPERVISORY COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATION BY VIRTUE OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE IN PRIVATE HOSPITALS). Tıp Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 10, 207–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/361620
Avci, Mustafa, "Sağlık Hizmetinde İdarenin Mali Sorumluluğu", Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 2012/1, s. 105 - 140. Aykın Aykut Cemil, Çınarlı Serkan, Sağlık Personelinin Hukuki Sorumluluğu, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2016.
Azrak, A. Ülkü; "Millileştirme ve Kamu Hizmeti", İHFM, C. 36, S. 1-4, Ayrı Bası, s. 44-78.
Bayındır, Savaş, "Sağlık Hizmetinde İdarenin ve Hekimlerin So- rumluluğu", Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi C. XI, Sa.1-2, Y.2007, s. 551-589.
Bilgen, Pertev; "Kamu Hizmeti Hakkında", İHİD, C. 1, S. 1, 1980, s. 113-116.
Çağlayan, Ramazan; İdari Yargılama Hukuku, Seçkin Yayınevi, 7. Baskı, Ankara 2015.
Çınarlı, Serkan; İdarenin Sağlık Hizmetinin Sunumundan Kaynak- lanan Hukuki Sorumluluğu, Orion Yayınevi, Ankara 2013.