Journals / Tıp Hukuku Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Limits of killing intent in medical criminal law

Tıp ceza hukukunda öldürme kastının sınırları

Pages
161–170
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article also mentions the discussions in the German doctrine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The article which is translated examines the most important classical issues of medical criminal law such as prof of killing intent, fundamental bases of the distinction between indirect intent and willful negligence ant the role of negligence behavior in determining the indirect intent which are discussed in the decision of German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) dated 07.07. 2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The evaluations of the author are also based on references to other precedent decisions of the court.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article also mentions the discussions in the German doctrine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The article which is translated examines the most important classical issues of medical criminal law such as prof of killing intent, fundamental bases of the distinction between indirect intent and willful negligence ant the role of negligence behavior in determining the indirect intent which are discussed in the decision of German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) dated 07.07. 2011. The evaluations of the author are also based on references to other precedent decisions of the court. The article also mentions the discussions in the German doctrine.

Özet

Tercümesi yapılan bu makale, BGH tarafından 07.07.2011 tarihinde verilen bir karar esas alarak tıp ceza hukukunun “klasik” alanına ilişkin en önemli sorunlardan olan öldürme kastının ispatlanması, öldürme suçuna ilişkin olası kast ve bilinçli taksir ayrımının temel esasları ve ihmal niteli- ğindeki davranışların (olası) kastın belirlenmesindeki rolü inceleme konusu yapmıştır. Yapılan değerlendirmelerde ayrıca bu konulara ilişkin emsal ni- teliğindeki diğer yargı kararlarına göndermelerde bulunulmuş, Alman öğre- tisinde konuya ilişkin tartışmalara yer verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUDLICH, H. (2012). Limits of killing intent in medical criminal law. Tıp Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 161–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/361583

References (2)

  1. Ulsenheimer Klaus, Arztstrafrecht in der Praxis, 4. Auflage, C.F. Müller, Heidelberg 2008. Kudlich Hans / Schulte-Sasse Uwe, "Täter hinter den Tätern" in deutschen Krankenhäusern? - Strafbarkeit von "patientenfernen" Entscheidern in Gesundheitseinrichtungen bei organisationsbedingten Patientenschäden", in: NStZ 2011 H: 5, s: 241 - 247. Neelmeier Tim, “Bin ich meines Kollegen Hüter? Strafbarkeit von Arztpraxisinhabern bei “Einkauf” von Billig- Anästhesie”, in: Arztrecht, H. 10/2011, s: 256 – 264. Jahn Mathias, “BGH, Beschl. v. 22.12.2010 (3 StR 239/10) - Einwilligung bei Operation und Folgeoperation”, in: JuS, 2011, s: 468-470.
  2. Spickhoff Andreas, Medizinrecht (Kommentar), Beck Verlag, Münih 2011. Beck'scher Online-Kommentar – StGB, Ed: 15, Kaynak: http://beckonline.beck.de/?vpath=bibdatakommbeckok_str_19stgbcontbeckok.stgb. htm&pos=0&hlwords=#xhlhit (Erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2012)