SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tıp Hukuku Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 17

(ALTERNATIVE TO LIVING ORGAN DONATION: CROSS-OVER TRANSPLANTATION AND REGULATIONS IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES)

CANLI VERİCİLİ ORGAN NAKLİ ALTERNATİFİ: ÇAPRAZ TRANSPLANTASYON VE ÇEŞİTLİ ÜLKELERDEKİ YASAL DÜZENLEMELER

Begüm KOCAMAZ
Pages
187–204
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theaim of thisstudy is toexamine how live organ donor transplantsandcross-organ transplantation practices are performed in various countries’ legal systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intoday's world, organ donation has beenused as a clinical treatment that increases the standart of living and saves lives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it brings many problems both legally and ethically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theaim of thisstudy is toexamine how live organ donor transplantsandcross-organ transplantation practices are performed in various countries’ legal systems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Intoday's world, organ donation has beenused as a clinical treatment that increases the standart of living and saves lives. However, it brings many problems both legally and ethically. The most prominent one is the illegal organ trafficking. As a matter of fact, there is always a concern on living organ donation process whether organ trade takes place or not. For this reason, live organ transplantation has been subject to strict legal regulations. Cross-transplantation is an alternative method to live organ donor transplantation. Theaim of thisstudy is toexamine how live organ donor transplantsandcross-organ transplantation practices are performed in various countries’ legal systems.

Özet

Günümüzde organ bağışı hayat standardını yükselten ve hayat kurtaran klinik bir tedavi yöntemi olarak uygulanmaktadır. Ancak hem hukuki hem de etik açıdan birçok problemi beraberinde getirmektedir.Bunlardan en belirgini yasadışı organ ticareti olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Nitekim canlı vericili organ nakillerinde arka planda daima organticaretinin yapılıp yapılmadığı endişesi yer almaktadır. Bu nedenle sözkonusu husus sıkı hukuki düzenlemelere tabi tutulmuştur. Çapraz organnakli, canlı vericili organ nakline alternatif bir uygulamadır. Bu çalışmada, canlı vericili organ nakli ve çapraz transplantasyon uygulamalarınınçeşitli ülkelerin mevzuatlarında ne şekilde düzenlendiği incelenecekti

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAMAZ, B. (2020). (ALTERNATIVE TO LIVING ORGAN DONATION: CROSS-OVER TRANSPLANTATION AND REGULATIONS IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES). Tıp Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 17, 187–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/361496

References (11)

  1. Achilles, Mark, Lebendspende- Nierentransplantation, Einetheologisch- ethischeBeurteilung, LIT Verlag, 1.Aufl., Münster 2004.
  2. Aydın, Murat, Tıbbi Müdahale Olarak Organ ve Doku Nakli ve Ceza Sorumluluğu, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2008.
  3. Beckmann, Jan P./Kirste, Günther/Schreiber, Hans- Ludwig (Hrsg.), Organ- transplantation: medizinische, rechtlicheundethischeAspekte, Ethik in dieBiowissenschaften- Sachstandsberichtedes DRZE, Band VII, Karl AlberVerlag, 2008.
  4. Böhming, G.A./Bond, G., MöglichkeitenundPerspektiveneines „KidneyPairedDonation“ Programms – DasWienerProgramm in: Nieren- undHochdruckkrankheitenZeitschrift., 2019; 48(4). BSG, Urteilvom 10. Dezember 2003 – B 9 VS 1/01 R, NeueZeitschriftfür Sozialrecht (NZS)2004.
  5. Bulgar Organ Transplantasyonu Kanunu, İngilizce dilinde, URL: https: //iamn.bg/download/act-on-transplantation-of-organs-tissues-andcells/?wpdmdl=6518&refresh=5d890724ccd921569261348[Erişim Tarihi: 24.09.2019].
  6. Çevik, Cahide/Özyürek, Pakize. (Ed.), Organ Nakli Hemşireliği, Nobel Tıp Yayınevi, İstanbul2017. DasLeberBuch.WiehalteichmeineLebergesund?NeueThreapieundStand der Forschung.DieLebervon A bis Z, Deutscheleberstiftung (Ed.), SchlüterscheVerlag, 3. Aufl., 2016.
  7. EntwurfeinesGesetzesüberdieSpende, EntnahmeundÜbertragungvonOrganen (Transplantationsgesetz - TPG), BT-Drs. 13/4355 vom 16. April 1996. URL: http: //dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/ btd/13/043/1304355.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 09.08.2019]
  8. Fateh- Moghadam, Bijan, DieEinwilligung in dieLebendorganspende, MünchenerÜniversitätsschriften, Reihe der JuristischenFakultät, Band 219, C.H. BeckVerlag, München 2008. Fransız Sağlık Kanunu- İngilizce dilinde-. URL: https: //www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/520032017006/consolide. [Erişim Tarihi: 08.08.2019].
  9. Gürkan, Alp/Koçar, Serdar, Çapraz Vericili Renal Transplantasyon, Türkiye Klinikleri J.Surg. Med. Sci. 2006, 2(21). Hagen, Lars, Dierechtlichenundethischen Probleme der Crossover-Lebendspende, SchriftenreiheMedizinrecht in ForshungundPraxis, Verlag Dr. Kovac, Band 41, Hamburg 2013.
  10. Kocamaz Şahin, Begüm, Organ Nakli Hukuku- Türk ve Alman Organ Nakli Hukukunun Karşılaştırılması, Legal Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2019.
  11. Kranenburg, WL./Visak, T./Weimar, W. et al., Starting a CrossoverKidneyTransplantation Program in TheNetherlands: EthicalandPsycologicalconsiderations,Journal of TheTransplantationSociety, 2004; 78. KröllWoflgang/Schaupp, Walter. (Hrsg.), HirntodundOrgantransplantation: Medizinische, ethischeundrechtlicheBetrachtungen, NomosVerlag, Baden-Baden 2014. Laufs,