SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı:3

Validity of Environmental and Financial Kuznets Curve: The Case of Turkey

Çevresel ve Finansal Kuznets Eğrisinin Geçerliliği: Türkiye Örneği

Mustafa TORUSDAĞ
Abdulkadir BARUT
Pages
125–136
Publication Date
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the analysis findings, the Environmental Kuznets Curve in the examined period in Turkey were found to be valid, but Financial Kuznets Curve has not been found to be valid for Turkey's economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined the distribution of income and economic growth relationship Kuznets (1955) in environmental Kuznets hypothesis is valid in Turkey for the period 1990-2017 was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also for the 2002-2017 period and Jonanovic Greenwood (1990) revealed that in order to examine the relationship between financial development and income distribution inequalities examined with financial Kuznets hypothesis validity for Turkey was investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the analysis findings, the Environmental Kuznets Curve in the examined period in Turkey were found to be valid, but Financial Kuznets Curve has not been found to be valid for Turkey's economy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kuznets Eğrisi · Finans · Çevre

Abstract

This study examined the distribution of income and economic growth relationship Kuznets (1955) in environmental Kuznets hypothesis is valid in Turkey for the period 1990-2017 was investigated. Also for the 2002-2017 period and Jonanovic Greenwood (1990) revealed that in order to examine the relationship between financial development and income distribution inequalities examined with financial Kuznets hypothesis validity for Turkey was investigated. In the study, the validity of the hypotheses was examined by ADF unit root test and Bayer and Hanck (2012) cointegration tests. According to the analysis findings, the Environmental Kuznets Curve in the examined period in Turkey were found to be valid, but Financial Kuznets Curve has not been found to be valid for Turkey's economy.

Özet

Bu çalışmada gelir dağılımı ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisini inceleyen Kuznets (1955)’in Çevresel Kuznets Hipotezi’nin 1990-2017 dönemi için Türkiye’de geçerliliğinin incelenmesi yanısıra 2002-2017 dönemi için Greenwood ve Jonanovic (1990)’ın, finansal gelişme ve gelir dağılımı adaletsizliği ilişkisini incelediği Finansal Kuznets Hipotezi’nin Türkiye için geçerliliğinin ADF birim kök testi ve Bayer ve Hanck (2012) eşbütünleşme testleri ile analiz edilmesi ve hipotezlerin geçerliliği incelenmektedir. Analiz bulgularına göre, Türkiye’de incelenen dönemde Çevresel Kuznets eğrisi geçerli olduğu ancak Finansal Kuznets Eğrisi’nin Türkiye ekonomisi için geçerli olmadığı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORUSDAĞ, M., BARUT, A. (2020). Validity of Environmental and Financial Kuznets Curve: The Case of Turkey. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı:3, 125–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/360794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akıncı, Merter (2015). “Fuzzy Water Fishing: Trickle - Down the Effect of Cross-Turkey Economic Zone Forecast”, Work and Society, 44 (1), 195-220.
  2. Ang, J.B. (2008), “Finance and Inequality: The Case of India, Monash University, Department of Economics”, Discussion Paper, No. 8, 1-25.
  3. Artan, S., Hayaloğlu, P., and Seyhan, B. (2015), “Environmental Pollution in Turkey, Openness and Economic Growth Relationship”, Management and Economics Research Journal, 13 (1), 308-325.
  4. Baiardia, Donatella, and Claudio Morana (2016), “The Financial Kuznets Curve: Evidence for the Euro Area”, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol 39, 265–269.
  5. Batuo, M.E, F. Guidi, and K. Mlambo (2010), “Financial Development and Income Inequality: Evidence from African Countries”, MPRA Paper 25658, University Library of Munich, Germany. Awesome, Selim, Temurlenk, M. Sinan, (2007), “Adapted Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Case Study on Turkey”, Atatürk University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 21 (1), 1-12.
  6. Charfeddine, Lanouar and Khediri, Karim Ben, (2016), “Financial Development and Environmental Quality in UAE: Cointegration with Structural Breaks”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, pp. 13221335. Çetin, M., and Şeker, F. (2014), “Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution's Impact on Foreign Trade: A ARDL Bounds Test Approach for Turkey”, Management and Economics: Celal Bayar University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21 (2), 213-230.
  7. Destek, M. A., Okumuş, I., and Manga, M. (2017), “Financial Development and Income Distribution Relationship in Turkey: Financial Kuznets Curve”, Doğuş University Journal, 18 (2), 153-165.
  8. Dickey, D. A., W. A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution Of The Estimators ForAutoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74, No. 366, pp. 427-431.
  9. Dickey, D. A. W. A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, Vol. 49, No. 4., pp. 1057-1072.
  10. Enders, Walter (1995),
  11. Applied Econometric Time Series, First Edition,
  12. Wiley. Govindaraju, V.G.R.C. and Chor, Foon, Tang (2013), “The Dynamic Links Between CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth and Coal Consumption in China and India”, Applied Energy, 104, p. 310--318. Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1991), “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working Paper, No. 3914, 1-57.
  13. Güney, A. (2018), “Extended Environmental Kuznets Curve of R