SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Öneri Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 23

WORLD TRADE AND CANCUN SUMMIT

Hayri KOZANOĞLU
Pages
191–196
Publication Date
2005-01-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The problem lies there.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The world trade summit held in Cancun collapsed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The only positive development in the meeting might be the birth of the G-21 initiative led by Brazil, China, and India.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The problem lies there.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:World Trade · WTO · G-21 initiative

Abstract

The world trade summit held in Cancun collapsed. The Failure in Mexico means a blow to the multilateral trade System that has beeıı contributing to global wealth. The future of WTO after defeats in Seattle and Cancun is seriously in danger. The only positive development in the meeting might be the birth of the G-21 initiative led by Brazil, China, and India. Now, G-21 has a chance of challenging the US, EU, and Japan as one voice. They must overcome the lack of expertise in future meetiııgs with a good cooperatioıı.In world trade, if multilateral cooperation ceases to existent, everybody would lose but the ones who would lose the most would be poor couııtries. Cancun’s failure did not make this sceııario iııevitable but possible. The problem lies there.

Özet

The world trade summit held in Cancun collapsed. The Failure in Mexico means blow to the multilateral trade System that has beeıı contributing to global wealth. The future of WTO after defeats in Seattle and Cancun is seriously in danger. The only positive development in the meeting might be the birth of the G-21 initiative led by Brazil, China, and India. Now, G-21 has a chance of challenging the US, EU, and Japan as one voice. They must overcome the lack of expertise in future meetiııgs with a good cooperation. In world trade, if multilateral cooperation ceases to existent, everybody would lose but the ones who would lose the most would be poor couııtries. Cancun’s failure did not make this sceııario iııevitable but possible. The problem lies there.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOZANOĞLU, H. (2005). WORLD TRADE AND CANCUN SUMMIT. Öneri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 23, 191–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/36073

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. The WTO under fire. (2003). The Economist, September 20lh-26lh, pp.29-31
  2. Guardian. (2003). Guardian trade supplenıent, September 11-17, p.2
  3. Bhagirath, L.D. (1999). The World Trade Organization -A [10] Vidal, J. (2003). The tree of life has become a battle. Guide. UNCTAD, pp.3-4. Guardian Trade Supplement, p.7
  4. Stiglitz, J. (2003). The World should have a vested interest in resolving inequalities. Guardian trade supplement, September 11-17, p.7
  5. Buğra, A. (2003). Piyasa Ekonomisi Macerası: Dün ve Bugün. Birikim Dergisi, Haziran-Temmuz, 170/171, p.15
  6. Watkins, K. (2003). Countdown to Cancun. Prospect, August. pp.28-33
  7. Rodrik, D. (2001). Trading in Illusions. Foreign Policy, March-April,. pp.55-56
  8. UNCTAD. (2002). Trade and Development Report, pp.IV-VII
  9. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Trade Imbalances. Guardian Weekly, September 3, s.7
  10. Khor, M. (2003). The Singapore Issues. Third Worl.d Resurgence Issue, p.31
  11. The Economist. (2003). A Survey of the World Econonıy, September 20th, p.32.