Journals / Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi / 2007 / Sayı: 1

Retranslocation of nutrients in and its ecological circumstance

Ağaçlarda besin maddelerinin yeniden taşınması olayı ve ekolojik yönü

Pages
134–145
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion; (a) there are significant differences between conifer and deciduous forest trees; (b) retranslocation should be evaluated in integrity with several alternative indices; (c) retranslocation in roots generally exists more in dry sites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since “retranslocation” comprises a large portion of nutrient cycle and which also should be reconsidered in ecosystem investigations, it has a great importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Retranslocation varies through nutrient wealth of a given site, tree species and nutrient use characteristics of trees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion; (a) there are significant differences between conifer and deciduous forest trees; (b) retranslocation should be evaluated in integrity with several alternative indices; (c) retranslocation in roots generally exists more in dry sites.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:azot · besin maddesi yarayışlılığı · besin maddesi taşınması

Abstract

Since “retranslocation” comprises a large portion of nutrient cycle and which also should be reconsidered in ecosystem investigations, it has a great importance. Retranslocation varies through nutrient wealth of a given site, tree species and nutrient use characteristics of trees. In this study an attempt was made to present the collection of researches on retranslocation, the tree organs where it occurs, the factors effective on retranslocation, and the additional components with which retranslocation should be appreciated together. As a conclusion; (a) there are significant differences between conifer and deciduous forest trees; (b) retranslocation should be evaluated in integrity with several alternative indices; (c) retranslocation in roots generally exists more in dry sites.

Özet

Besin maddelerinin “yeniden tasınması” besin maddesi döngüsünün önemli bölümünü olusturmasından ve ekosistem incelemelerinde bu hususa da yer verilmesi gerektiğinden dolayı büyük bir öneme sahiptir. Yeniden tasınma, yetisme ortamının besin maddesi varlığı, ağaç türü ve besin maddelerinin kullanım özellikleri ile değismektedir. Bu çalısma ile yeniden tasınma olayının gerçeklestiği ağaç organları, yeniden tasınmayı etkileyen etkenler, yeniden tasınma olayının değerlendirilmesinde göz önüne alınması gereken hususlar sunulmaya çalısılmıstır. Önemli oranda yapraklarda gerçeklesen bu olayın (a) iğne yapraklı ağaçlar ile yapraklı ağaçlar arasında farklı siddetlerde meydana geldiği; (b) yeniden tasınma olayının diğer unsurlarla birlikte değerlendirilmesi gerektiği; (c) köklerde gerçeklesen yeniden tasınma olayının daha çok kurak alanlarda gerçeklestiği elde edilen somut sonuçlardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TECİMEN, H. B., MAKİNECİ, E. (2007). Retranslocation of nutrients in and its ecological circumstance. Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi, Sayı: 1, 134–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/358684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andrews, J. A., Siccama, T. G. 1995. Retranslocation of Calcium and magnesium at the hearthwoodsapwood boundary of Atlantic White Cedar. Ecology, 76 (2): 659-663.
  2. Binkley, D., Sollins, P., Bell, R., Sachs, D., Myrold, D., 1992. Biogeochemistry of Adjacent Conifer and Alder / Conifer Stands. Ecology 73: 2022 – 2033.
  3. Birk, E. M., Vitousek, P. M. 1986. Nitrogen Availability and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Loblolly Pine Stands. Ecology, 67 (1): 69-79.
  4. Blanco, J. A., Zavala, M. A., Imbert, J. B., Castillo, F. J. 2005. Sustainability of Forest Management Practices: Evaluation Through A Simulation Model of Nutrient Cycling. Forest Ecology and Management, Article in Press.
  5. Bubb. K. A., Xu, Z. H., Simpson, J. A., Saffigna, P. G. 1998. Some Nutrient Dynamics Associated With Litter Decomposition in Hoop Pine Plantations of Southeast Queensland, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 110: 343-352.
  6. Chapin, F. S., III, Kedrowski, R. A. 1983. Seasonal Changes in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fractions and Autumn Retranslocation in Evergreen and Deciduous Taiga Trees. Ecology, 64 (2): 376-391.
  7. Del Arco, J. M., Escudero, A., Garrido, M. V. 1991. Effects of Site Characteristics on Nitrogen Retranslocation From Senescing Leaves. Ecology, 72 (2): 701-708.
  8. Gordon, W. S., Jackson, R. B. 2000. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots. Ecology, 8: 275-280.
  9. Heckathorn, S. A., DeLucia, E. H. 1994. Drought-Induced Nitrogen Retranslocation In Perennial C4 Grasses of Tallgrass Prairie. Ecology, 75 (7): 1877-1886.
  10. Hodges, J. D., Gardiner S. 1992. Ecology and Physiology of Oak Regeneration. Oak Regeneration: Serious Problems, Practical Recommendations, Symposium Proceedings, Knoxville, Tennessee, September 8-10, 1992. David L. Loftis and Charles E. McGee (Editors). Published by, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asaheville, N.C. Laclau, J. P., Bouillet, J. P., Ranger, J., Joffre, R., Gouma, R., Saya, A. 2004. Dynamics of Nutrient Retranslocation in Stemwood of a Eucalyptus Clone in the Congo; Site Management and Productivity in Tropical Plantation Forests: Proceedings of Workshops in Congo July 2001 and China February 2003. CIFOR 2004.
  11. Lin, P., Wang, W. 2001. Changes in the leaf composition, leaf mass and leaf area during leaf senescence in three species of mangroves. Ecological Engineering, 16: 415-424.
  12. Lodhiyal, N., Lodhiyal, L. S. 1997a. Aspects of nutrient cycling and nutrient use pattern of Bhabar Shisam forests in central Himalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 176: 237-252