Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 52

Reorganization Efforts in the Public Sector: A Position Norm Analysis Study

Kamu Kuruluşlarında Yeniden Yapılanma: Bir Norm Kadro Çalışması

Pages
97–114
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The techniques used, problems encountered, and solutions developed are discussed along with some critical suggestions for future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, a call has been made to develop a more systematic approach to human resources management in the public sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A low-equivalent decision of the Cabinet required all government organizations to do organizational and job analyses and to conduct position norm analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The techniques used, problems encountered, and solutions developed are discussed along with some critical suggestions for future studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recently, a call has been made to develop a more systematic approach to human resources management in the public sector. A low-equivalent decision of the Cabinet required all government organizations to do organizational and job analyses and to conduct position norm analyses. To comply with this decision, in many public sector organizations studies that necessitated active participation of industrial and organizational psychologists have been started. The purpose of this study is to describe a position norm analysis study conducted in a public sector organization, which provides technical supervision and guidance to local governments in the establishment of their infrastructure. The techniques used, problems encountered, and solutions developed are discussed along with some critical suggestions for future studies.

Özet

Son birkaç yıldır kamu kurum ve kuruluşlarında insan kaynakları yönetimi alanında sistematik bir yaklaşımın yerleştirilmesi gündeme gelmiştir. Bu çerçevede çıkartılan bir kanun hükmünde kararname ile tüm kamu kurum kuruluşlarında örgüt analizi ve iş analizi çalışmalarının yapılması ve norm kadro esaslarının belirlenmesi zorunlu kılınmıştır. Dolayısıyla, birçok kamu kuruluşunda endüstri ve örgüt psikologlarının aktif katılımını gerektiren çalışmalar başlatılmıştır. Sunulan çalışmanın amacı, temel işlevi yerel yönetimlere götürülen altyapı hizmetlerinin gerçekleştirilmesinde teknik kontrol ve danışmanlık hizmetleri vermek olan bir kamu kuruluşunda yapılan norm kadro çalışmasını aktarmaktır. Kullanılan teknikler, süreçte yaşanan problemler ve geliştirilen çözüm yolları ve ileride yapılacak benzer çalışmalar için önemli bazı öneriler paylaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜMER, H. C., KORKMAZ, H. T. E. (2003). Reorganization Efforts in the Public Sector: A Position Norm Analysis Study. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 52, 97–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/357625

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aksoy, fi., & Polato¤lu, A. (2002). Bir kamu kuruluflunda yenidenyap›lanma: Örgüt analizi.Bas›lmam›fl makale. OrtaDo¤u Teknik Üniversitesi.
  2. Arling, G., Nordquist, R. H., Brant, B. A., & Capitman, J. A.(1987). Patient classification by nursing resource use.Medical Care, 25 (1), 9-19.
  3. Barnes, R. M. (1968). Motion and time study: Design andmeasurement of work,New York: John Wiley & Sons,Inc.6thedition. Baflbakanl›k Devlet Personel Baflkanl›¤› (2000). Norm kadro elkitab›.Ankara: Sa¤l›k Bakanl›¤› Ana-Çocuk Sa¤l›¤› veAile Planlamas› Genel Müdürlü¤ü Bas›mevi. Burke, T. A., McKee, J. R., Wilson, H. C., Donahue, R. M.,Batenhorst, A. S., & Pathak, D. S. (2000). A comparisonof time-and-motion and self-reporting methods of workmeasurement. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 30(3), 118-125.
  4. Cascio, W. F. (1991). Applied psychology in personnelmanagement,Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: PrenticeHall. 4thedition. Fine, S. A. (1995). Benchmark tasks for job analysis: A Guidefor functional job analysis (FJA) scales.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum. Ghorpade, J. (1988). Job analysis: A handbook for the humanresource director (sf. 13-180).
  5. Englewood Cliffs, NewJersey: Prentice Hall. Harvey, R. J. (1990). The common-metric questionnaire for theanalysis and evaluation of jobs(field test version 1.12).San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Harvey, R. J. (1991). The common-metric questionnaire (CMQ):A job analysis system(first edition). San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation. Harvey, R. J. (1993). Research monograph: The development ofthe common-metric questionnaire (CMQ). PersonelSystems & Technologies Corporation. Harvey, R. J., & Wilson, M. A. (2000). Yes Virginia, there is anobjective reality in job analysis. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 21, 829-854
  6. International Labour Office (1979). Introduction to Work Study.Geneva. 3rdedition.Kanawathy, G. (1992). Introduction to work study.InternationalLabor Organisation, Geneva. 4thedition. Lindell, M. K., Clause, C. S., Brandt, C. J., & Landis, R. S.(1998). Relationship between organizational context andjob analysis task ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology,83 (5), 769-776.
  7. Meyers, F. E., & Stewart, J. R. (2002). Motion and time study forlean manufacturing, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 3rdedition McCormick, E. J., Jeanneret, P. R., & Mecham, R. C. (1972). Astudy of job characteristics and job dimensions as basedon the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). Journalof Applied Psychology, 56, 347-367.
  8. McCormick, E. J.,