Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 73

The Relationships between Anger, Narcissism and Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescence

Ergenlikte Reaktif-Proaktif Saldırganlık, Öfke ve Narsisizm İlişkisi

Pages
44–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that hostile attribution of intent and anger were related with reactive aggression.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent decades, aggression has been divided into two subtypes as reactive and proactive.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two hundred and seventy female and 236 male students filled out Reactive–Proactive Aggres- sion Questionnaire, Narcissistic Personality Questionnaire for Children, and The State-Trait Anger and Anger Ex- pression Scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that hostile attribution of intent and anger were related with reactive aggression.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In recent decades, aggression has been divided into two subtypes as reactive and proactive. The purpose of the study was to examine the social cognitions and emotions that differentiate reactive and proactive aggression. Another pur- pose of the study was to examine whether the adolescents’ reactive and proactive aggression levels was related with anger and narcissism. Two hundred and seventy female and 236 male students filled out Reactive–Proactive Aggres- sion Questionnaire, Narcissistic Personality Questionnaire for Children, and The State-Trait Anger and Anger Ex- pression Scale. Also, to measure typical characteristics of reactive and proactive aggression four different vignettes were utilized. Results indicated that hostile attribution of intent and anger were related with reactive aggression. Perceived self-efficacy for aggression, positive outcome expectations for aggression, and feeling good after enact- ing aggression were associated with proactive aggression. Regression analysis examining the relationships between anger, narcissism and reactive-proactive aggression revealed that trait anger and anger out predicted reactive aggres- sion. It was also found that proactive aggression was positively associated with the exploitativeness dimension of the narcissism and negatively associated with the superiority.

Özet

Son yıllarda saldırganlık konusunda yapılan çalışmalar saldırganlığı reaktif ve proaktif olmak üzere ikak incelemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amaçlarından biri reaktif ve proaktif saldırganlığın ayırt edici bilişbileşenlerini test etmek, diğeri ise ergenlerin reaktif ve proaktif saldırganlık düzeylerinin, öfke vlişkili olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaçla 270 kız, 236 erkek öğrenciye Reaktif-Proaktif SaldıÇocuklar için Narsisistik Kişilik Ölçeği ve Sürekli Öfke ve Öfke İfade Tarzı Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Aproaktif saldırganlığın tipik özelliklerini incelemek için dört farklı senaryo kullanılmıştır. Bulgular dyükleme ve öfkenin reaktif saldırganlık ile, saldırgan davranma konusunda kendini yeterli görme, sonolacağını düşünme ve iyi hissetmenin ise proaktif saldırganlık ile ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Öfkeeaktif ve proaktif saldırganlık ile ilişkisini incelemek amacı ile yapılan regresyon analizleri sürekyönelik öfkenin reaktif saldırganlığı yordadığını göstermiştir. Proaktif saldırganlık ise narsisizmin le pozitif yönde ilişkili iken üstünlük boyutu ile negatif yönde ilişkili bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACI, A. A., AKGÜN, S. (2014). The Relationships between Anger, Narcissism and Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescence. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 73, 44–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/357547

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği (1994). Mental Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal El Kitabı (DSM-IV) (4. baskı). (E. Köroğlu, Çev. Ed.). Ankara:
  2. Hekimler Yayın Birliği. Ang, R. P. ve Raine, A. (2009). Reliability, validity and invari- ance of the Narcissistic Personality Questionnaire for Children-Revised (NPQC-R). Journal of Psychopathol- ogy and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 143-151.
  3. Ang, R. P. ve Yusof, N. (2005). The relationship between ag- gression, narcissism and self-esteem in Asian children and adolescents. Current Psychology, 24, 113-122.
  4. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psy- chology, 8(4), 291-322.
  5. Arsenio, W. F., Adams, E. ve Gold, J. (2009). Social informa- tion processing, moral reasoning, and emotion attribu- tions: Relations with adolescents’ reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 8, 1739-1755.
  6. Barry, C. T., Frick, P. J. ve Killian, A. L. (2003). The relation of narcissism and self-esteem to conduct problems in children: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(1),139-152.
  7. Barry, T. D., Thompson, A., Barry, C. T., Lochman, J. E., Adler, K. ve Hill, K. (2007). The importance of narcissism in predicting proactive and reactive aggression in moder- ately to highly aggressive children. Aggressive Behavior, 33(3), 185-197.
  8. Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L. ve Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103(1), 5-33.
  9. Bettencourt, A. B. ve Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422-447.
  10. Campos, J., Campos, R. ve Barrett, K. (1989). Emergent themes in the study of emotional development and emotion regu- lation. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 394-402.
  11. Cenkseven, F. (2003). Öfke yönetimi becerileri programının er- genlerin öfke ve saldırganlık düzeylerine etkisi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 2(2), 153-167.
  12. Connor, D. F., Steingard, R. J, Anderson, J. J. ve Melloni J. R. (2003). Gender differences in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 33(4), 279-294.
  13. Crick, N. R. ve Ladd, G. W. (1990). Children’s perceptions of the outcomes of aggressive strategies: Do the ends justify being mean? Developmental Psychology, 26, 612-620.
  14. Crick, N. R ve Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformula- tion of information-processi