Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 73

Perceived Organizational Support as a Mediator of the Relationship between Leadership Styles and Organizational Outcomes

Liderlik Stillerinin Duygusal Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetiyle İlişkilerinde Örgütsel Destek Algısının Aracılık Rolü

Pages
1–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But perceived organizational support partially mediates the relationship between authoritarian, participative leadership and intention to leave.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study investigates the mediating role of perceived organizational support on the relationship between leadership styles (paternalistic, participative and authoritarian leadership) and organizational variables (affective commitment and intention to leave).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants are 341 (143 women and 198 men) white-collar employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But perceived organizational support partially mediates the relationship between authoritarian, participative leadership and intention to leave.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study investigates the mediating role of perceived organizational support on the relationship between leadership styles (paternalistic, participative and authoritarian leadership) and organizational variables (affective commitment and intention to leave). Participants are 341 (143 women and 198 men) white-collar employees. Analy- sis of data indicated that perceived organizational support fully mediates the relationship between authoritarian lead- ership and affective commitment. But perceived organizational support partially mediates the relationship between paternalistic, participative leadership and affective commitment. Moreover the relationship between paternalistic leadership and intention to leave is fully mediated by perceived organizational support. But perceived organizational support partially mediates the relationship between authoritarian, participative leadership and intention to leave.

Özet

Bu araştırmada babacan, katılımcı ve yetkeci liderlik stilleri ile örgütsel bağlılığın bir bileşeni olan duygusal bağlılık ve işten ayrılma niyeti örgütsel değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiler örgütsel destek algısının aracılık etkisi bağlamında incelenmektir. Araştırmaya 143 kadın ve 198 erkek olmak üzere toplam 341 beyaz yakalı çalışan katılmıştır. Araştır- manın bulgularına göre örgütsel destek algısının babacan ve katılımcı liderlik ile duygusal bağlılık ilişkisinde kısmi aracılık rolüne ve yetkeci liderlik ve duygusal bağlılık ilişkisinde ise tam aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca babacan liderlik ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde örgütsel destek algısının tam aracılık; katılımcı ve yetkeci liderlik ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde ise örgütsel destek algısının kısmi aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GİRAY, D. M., DURAN, D. Ş. (2014). Perceived Organizational Support as a Mediator of the Relationship between Leadership Styles and Organizational Outcomes. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 73, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/357546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, J. P.(1990). The measurement and an- tecedents of affective, continuance and normative com- mitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  2. Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M. ve Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29, 99-118.
  3. Aube, C., Rousseau, V. ve Morin, E. M. (2007). Perceived orga- nizational support and organizational commitment. Jour- nal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 479-495.
  4. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refine- ment and operationalization. U. Kim, K. S. Yang ve K. K. Hwang, (Ed.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context içinde (445-466).
  5. New York, NY: Springer Science Business Media Inc. Aycan, Z. ve Fikret-Paşa, S. (2003). Career choices, job selec- tion criteria, and leadership preferences in a transitional nation: The case of Turkey. Journal of Career Develop- ment, 30(2), 129-144.
  6. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. ve Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on hu- man resource management practices: A 10-country com- parison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 192-221.
  7. Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  8. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stodgill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3. baskı). New York, NY: The Free Press.
  9. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P. ve Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate respons- es: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organiza- tions. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117.
  10. Chew, Y. T. ve Wong, S. K. (2008). Effects of career mentor- ing experience and perceived organizational support on employee commitment and ıntentions to leave: A study among hotel workers in Malaysia. International Journal of Management, 25, 692-700.
  11. Cole, M. S. ve Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their rela- tionships to turnover intention: Does organizational hi- erarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 585-605.
  12. Dawley, D. D., Andrews, M. C. ve Bucklew, N. S. (2008)