SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 75

A Comparison of the Antecedents of Organizational Identification and Affective Commitment

Örgütsel Özdeşim ve Duygusal Bağlılığın Öncülleri Bağlamında Karşılaştırılması

EVRİM GÜLERYÜZ
Orhan AYDIN
Pages
18–35
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that strength of organizational identity, perceived external prestige, person-organization fit and need for affiliation predicted both organizational identification and affective commitment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was sought to clarify various antecedents of organizational identification and affective com- mitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were obtained from 444 employees of various public and private organizations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that strength of organizational identity, perceived external prestige, person-organization fit and need for affiliation predicted both organizational identification and affective commitment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study was sought to clarify various antecedents of organizational identification and affective com- mitment. Data were obtained from 444 employees of various public and private organizations. Two hierarchical regression analysis were conducted to find out the differences in the relationships of organizational identification, affective commitment and their antecedents. It was found that strength of organizational identity, perceived external prestige, person-organization fit and need for affiliation predicted both organizational identification and affective commitment. Besides this, organization-based self-esteem predicted organizational identification but not affective commitment, and job satisfaction predicted affective commitment but not organizational identification. It was also found that self-esteem, distributional justice, procedural justice and interactional justice were not predicted any of these constructs.

Özet

Bu araştırma örgütsel özdeşim ve duygusal bağlılığın çeşitli öncüllerle ilişkileri açısından farklılık gösterip göster- mediğini incelemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırma çeşitli illerde kamu sektörü ve özel sektörde görev yapan 444 katılımcı ile yürütülmüştür. Örgütsel özdeşimin duygusal bağlılıkla ortak ve farklı öncüllerini belirlemek amacıyla bu değişkenlerin her biri için ayrı hiyerarşik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Örgütün kimliğinin gücü, örgütün algıla- nan dışsal prestiji, kişi örgüt uyumu ve birarada olma ihtiyacının her iki değişkeni de yordadığı, örgüt temelli benlik değerinin sadece örgütsel özdeşimi, iş doyumunun ise sadece duygusal bağlılığı yordadığı, benlik değeri, bölüşüm- sel, işlemsel ve etkileşimsel adaletin ise iki değişkeni de yordamadığı saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLERYÜZ, E., AYDIN, O. (2015). A Comparison of the Antecedents of Organizational Identification and Affective Commitment. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 75, 18–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/357544

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement ve ante- cedents of affective, continuance ve normative commit- ment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psy- chology, 63, 1-18.
  2. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  3. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L. ve Piotrowski, M. (2002) Person- ality ve job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 87, 43-51.
  4. Bartels, J., Pruyn, A., De Jong, M. ve Joustra, I. (2007). Mul- tiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 173-190.
  5. Bateman, T. ve Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 95-112.
  6. Berscheid, E. ve Walster, H. (1978).
  7. Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Bryne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Aca- demic Press.
  8. Carmeli, A., Gilat, G. ve Weisberg, J. (2006). Perceived external prestige, organizational identification and affective com- mitment: A stakeholder approach. Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 92-104.
  9. Ceylan, S. (2009). İş Doyumu Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Yayınlanmamış çalışma, Ankara.
  10. Chai-Amonphaisal, K. ve Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2008). Roles of human resource practices and organizational justice in affective commitment and job performance of accoun- tants in Thai firms. Review of Business Research, 8, 47- 58. Cable, D. ve Judge, T. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions ve organizational entry. Organizational Behavior ve Human Decision Processes, 673, 294-311.
  11. Chang, E. (2002). Distributive justice and organizational commitment revisited: Moderation by layoff in the case of Korean employees. Human Resource Management, 41, 261-270.
  12. Cheney, G. (1983). On the various ve changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
  13. Christensena, N. ve Kerpera, S. (2013). Rejection of self or others? Majority–minority status moderates responses to strongly identified members of the out-group. Self and Identity, 12, 548-562.
  14. Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior ve Huma