Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 83

Summary A Diary Study on Organizational Conflict: Augmenters of the Negative Effects of Conflict

Örgütsel Çatışmaya Yönelik Bir Günlük Çalışması: Çatışmanın Olumsuz Etkilerini Artıran Unsurlar

Pages
20–37
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed and a call is made for designing creative conflict management intervention programs and conducting empirical studies to test the effectiveness of such interventions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between daily workplace conflict, negative affect and job satisfaction and the potential moderators of this process via a diary study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For that purpose data were collected from 140 academic and administrative employees of a public university in Turkey on task conflict, relationship conflict, negative emotion, and job satisfaction across 15 work days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed and a call is made for designing creative conflict management intervention programs and conducting empirical studies to test the effectiveness of such interventions
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between daily workplace conflict, negative affect and job satisfaction and the potential moderators of this process via a diary study. For that purpose data were collected from 140 academic and administrative employees of a public university in Turkey on task conflict, relationship conflict, negative emotion, and job satisfaction across 15 work days. Rumination about the conflict episode and taking conflict personally were also assessed daily (if any conflict occurred on that particular day) as potential within-person moderators of the conflict – negative emotion relationship. Problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping were assessed as trait-like measures and were tested as potential cross-level moderators. The regression analysis using Hierarchical Linear Modeling revealed that workplace conflict was related with decreased levels of daily job satisfaction, and this relationship was fully mediated by the daily negative emotions individuals experienced. Rumination about the conflict episode and taking conflict personally were found to moderate the relationship between daily task conflict and daily negative emotion. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed and a call is made for designing creative conflict management intervention programs and conducting empirical studies to test the effectiveness of such interventions

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı bir günlük çalışması aracılığıyla çalışanların iş yerinde yaşadığı günlük çatışmalar, duygularve iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkilerin ve bu ilişkileri düzenleyen unsurların incelenmesidir. Bu amaçla bir devlet üniversitesinde görev yapmakta olan 140 akademik ve idari personelden 15 iş günü boyunca görev çatışması, ilişkiselçatışma, negatif duygulanım ve iş doyumuna yönelik veri toplanmıştır. Çatışmaya yönelik ruminasyon ve çatışmayıkişiselleştirme günlük düzeyde ölçülerek çatışma ve negatif duygu arasındaki ilişkinin kişi-içi düzenleyici değişkenleri olarak ele alınmışlardır. Problem-odaklı başa çıkma ve duygu-odaklı başa çıkma ise günlük çalışmasının öncesinde ölçülerek kişiler-arası düzenleyici değişkenler olarak test edilmişlerdir. Hiyerarşik Doğrusal Modelleme yöntemi kullanılarak yürütülen regresyon analizleri sonucunda çalışanların hissettiği günlük negatif duygu miktarınınçatışma yaşama ve günlük iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkiye tam aracılık ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Ruminasyon, çatışmayıkişiselleştirme ve problem-odaklı başa çıkmanın görev çatışması ve negatif duygu arasındaki ilişkiyi anlamlı düzeyde düzenlediği görülmüştür. Bulguların kuramsal ve pratik açıdan çıkarımları tartışılmaktadır. Örgütsel çatışmalarayönelik yaratıcı müdahale programları geliştirilmesinde dikkate alınması gerekenler ve bu programların etkililiğinisınayan görgül çalışmalara duyulan ihtiyaç vurgulanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, H. T. E. (2019). Summary A Diary Study on Organizational Conflict: Augmenters of the Negative Effects of Conflict. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 83, 20–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/357500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aiken, L. S. ve West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, London. Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J. ve Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K. ve Sommer, K. L. (1998). Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. Journal of Personality, 66, 1081–1124.
  3. Bilgic, R. (1999). A different way of testing the interaction between core job dimensions and growth need strength (GNS). J. Axelsson, B. Bergmanve J. Eklund (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on TQM and Human Factors içinde (210–215).
  4. Brenner, A. (2014). How to stop taking things personally. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday. com/blog/in-flux/201408/how-stop-taking-things-personally Brown, K. W. ve Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.
  5. Dallinger, J. M. ve Hample, D. (1989). Taking conflict personally: Conceptualization and scale development. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco. Dallinger, J. M. ve Hample, D. (1995). Personalizing and managing conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 6, 273–289.
  6. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2008). The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 5–18.
  7. De Dreu, C. K. W. ve Beersma, B. (2005). Conflict in organizations: Beyond effectiveness and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 105–117.
  8. De Dreu, C. K. W. van Dierendonck, D. ve Dijkstra, M. T. (2004). Conflict at work and individual well-being. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 6–26.
  9. De Dreu, C. K. W. ve Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
  10. De Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L. ve Jehn, K. A. (2012). Theparadox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360–390.
  11. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bullettin, 95, 542–75.
  12. Dijkstra, M. T. M., Van Dierendonck, D. ve Evers, A. (2005). Responding to conflict at work and individual we