Journals / Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Relationship among the types of delusions and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with schizophrenia and acute manic with psychotic features

Akut dönemdeki şizofreni hastaları ve psikotik özellikli manik atak hastalarında sosyodemografik ve klinik özelliklerin sanrı türleriyle ilişkisi

Pages
291–301
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found to be significant relation between gender and grandiose and jealousy delusions, and between mother‟s age and religious/mystical delusions in patients with schizophrenia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, it has been aimed to investigate the relationship among the types of delusions and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with manic attack with psychotic features (bipolar affective disorder-BAD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study was conducted with 105 patients with schizophrenia and 72 patientsst whit BAD manic attack with psychotic features between in February 1st 2011 and February 1 2012, in Osmangazi University, Medical School in EskiĢehir, in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found to be significant relation between gender and grandiose and jealousy delusions, and between mother‟s age and religious/mystical delusions in patients with schizophrenia.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it has been aimed to investigate the relationship among the types of delusions and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with manic attack with psychotic features (bipolar affective disorder-BAD). Methods: This study was conducted with 105 patients with schizophrenia and 72 patientsst whit BAD manic attack with psychotic features between in February 1st 2011 and February 1 2012, in Osmangazi University, Medical School in EskiĢehir, in Turkey. The first researcher has been interviewed with all patients face- to-face and has been applied to patients the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Stan- dardized Mini Mental Test, and Psychosocial and Environmental Problems Questionnaire. Every patient has been filled up the Sociodemographic and Clinical Information Form. SPSS 18.0 package program was used in thelysis of data. SPSS 18.0 package program was used in the analysis of data. Results: Persecution delusion was the most prevalent seen (n=136, 76.8%). The ratio of persecution delusion in patients with schizophrenia was 85.7% (n=90), and 63.9% (n=46) in patients with BAD. Reference delusion was in the second frequency (n=86, 48.6%). The ratio of reference delusion in patients with schizophrenia was 55.2% (n=58), and 38.9% (n=28)patients with BAD, and the difference between two groups was found to be significant statistically. Grandiose delusion was in the third frequency (n=50, 28.2%); the ratio of grandiose delusion in patients with schizophrenia was 21.0% (n=22), and 38.9% (n=28) in patients with BAD, and the difference between two groups was foundbe significant statistically. It was found to be significant relation between gender and grandiose and jealousy delusions, and between mother‟s age and religious/mystical delusions in patients with schizophrenia. It was found to be significant relation between age and grandiose delusion, and between mother‟s education durationgrandiose and jealousy delusions in patients with BAD. Conclusions: Schizophrenia has hallucination, delusion, disorganized behavior; and it is similar to manic attack with psychotic feature as clinically. The sociocultural factors have influence on the type and content of delusions. It is not avoided that the differences among studies that investigated the types of delusions are seen in BAD manic attack with psychotic features withoutfavorable scale. There is a few study in this issue therefore it is difficult that to identify the cultural differences of delusions.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalıĢmada sıklıkla karıĢtırılan akut dönemdeki Şizofreni (şizofreni) ve psikotik özellikli manik atak (ĠUDDB) hastalarında sosyodemografik özellikler ve klinik özelliklerle sanrı türlerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmış- tır. Yöntem: Bu çalışma Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi‟ne 01 şubat 2011-01 ġubat 2012 tarihleri arasında baĢvuran 105 Ģizofreni ve 72 İUDDB hastasıyla yürütülmüştür. Hastalarla yüz yüze görüĢülerek DSM-IV Eksen I Bozuklukları için YapılandırılmıĢ Klinik Görüşme, Standardize Mini Mental Test ve Psikososyal ve Çevre- sel Sorunlar Anketi uygulanmıĢtır. Hastalar Sosyodemografik ve Klinik Veri Formunu doldurmuştur. Verilerin ististiksel değerlendirilmesinde SPSS 18.0 paket programı kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda şizofreni ve İUDDB hastalarında toplam olarak en sık görülen sanrı kötülük görme sanrısıydı (s=136, %76.8). Kötülük görme sanrısı Ģizofreni hastalarının %85.7‟sinde (s=90), ĠUDDB hastalarının %63.9‟unda (s=46) vardı ve iki grup arasın- daki fark anlamlıydı. Ġkinci sıklıkta toplam hastaların %48.6‟sında (s=86) alınma sanrısı vardı. Alınma sanrısı şizof- reni hastalarının %55.2‟sinde (s=58), İUDDB hastalarının %38.9‟unda (s=28) vardı ve iki grup arasındaki anlamlıydı. Üçüncü sıklıkta tüm hastaların 50‟sinde (%28.2) saptanan büyüklük sanrısı şizofreni grubunda 22 (%21.0) hastada, İUDDB grubunda ise 28 (%38.9) hastada vardı; aralarındaki fark anlamlıydı. ġizofreni hastala- rında cinsiyetle büyüklük ve kıskançlık, son ataktan sonraki başvuru süresiyle kıskançlık, annenin yaşıyla dinsel- mistik sanrılar arasında anlamlı ilişki saptanmıştır. İUDDB hastalarında yaşla büyüklük, son ataktan sonraki başvuru süresiyle kıskançlık, annenin eğitim süresiyle büyüklük ve kıskançlık sanrıları arasında fark anlamlı ilişki saptan- mıĢtır. Tartışma: şizofreninin varsanı, sanrı ve dezorganize davranıĢın egemen olduğu klinik tablosu ile ĠUDDB‟- nin psikotik özellikli manik atağı arasında klinik olarak benzerlik vardır. Sanrı türü ve içeriği sosyodemografik, sosyokültürel ve klinik özelliklerden etkilenir. Bu konuda geliĢtirilmiĢ bir ölçek olmadan yapılacak çalışmalar arasında büyük farklılıklar çıkacağı açıktır. Sanrı içerikleri konusunda az sayıda çalıĢma olması, sanrı içeriğinin kültürel farklılıklarının saptanmasını zorlaştırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turgut, H., YENİLMEZ, Ç. (2013). Relationship among the types of delusions and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with schizophrenia and acute manic with psychotic features. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 291–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/355844

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Oryal T. Stigma: Ruhsal Hastalıklara Yönelik Tutumlar ve Damgalama. Ġzmir, 2007
  2. Özgür G, Karaaslan A, Çam O, Gürkan A, Dülgerler ġ, Uysal O. Bornova Sağlık Grup BaĢkanlığı‟na bağlı toplumda ruhsal belirtilerin değerlendirilmesi. E.Ü. Rektörlüğü AraĢtırma Fonu, Proje No:1995 HYO-06, Ġzmir, 1998
  3. UlaĢ H, Tunca Z. Bir üniversite hastanesi psikiyatri klini- ğinde yatan hastaların maliyet analizi. Nöropsikiyatri ArĢivi Dergisi 2010; 47:144-149
  4. Markowitz JC, Milrod B. Duygudurum bozuklukları: ĠntrapsiĢik ve kiĢilerarası yönü. BJ Sadock, VA Sadock, (Eds.), Kaplan & Sadock‟s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, eighth ed., H Aydın, A Bozkurt (Çev. Ed.), New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007, s.1603- 1611
  5. Üstün TB. The global burden of mental disorders. Am J Public Health 1999; 89:1315-1318
  6. Wittchen HU, Jacobi F. Size and burden of mental dis- orders in Europe: A critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15:357-376
  7. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment ofmortality and disability from diseases, injury and risk factors in 1990 projected to 2020. Geneva, World Bank, Word Health Organi- zation and Harvard School of Public Health, 1996
  8. Çetin M, Ceylan ME. AraĢtırma ve Klinik Uygulamada Biyolojik Psikiyatri. Üçüncü baskı, Ġstanbul: Yerküre Tanıtım ve Yayıncılık Hizmetleri, 2005, s.83-124
  9. Abood Z, Sharkey A, Webb M, Kelly A, Gill M. Are patients with bipolar affective disorder socially disad- vantaged? A comparison with a control group. Bipolar Disord 2002; 4:243-248
  10. Grunze H. At the edge of the bipolar spectrum: primacy of affective over psychotic symptoms or vice versa. World Psychiatry 2011; 10:181-186
  11. Strakowski SM, Keck FE, Arnold LM, Collins J, Wilson RM, Fleck DE, et al. Bipolar and Psychotic Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Univer- sity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64:747-754
  12. Kim K, Li D, Jiang Z, Cui X, Lin L, Kang JJ. Schizo- phrenic delusions among Koreans, Korean-Chinese and Chinese: a transcultural study. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1993; 39:190-199
  13. Kiev A. Trans Culturel Psychiatry. London: Free Press, 1972
  14. Karin-Gutiérrez L, Schmid-Siegel B, Bankier B, Walter H. Delusions in first-admitted patients: Gender, themes and diagnoses. Psychopathology 2001; 34:1-7
  15. Güneri E. ġizofreni ve Bipolar Affektif Bozukluk-Manik Epizod Tanısı AlmıĢ Hastaların Rors