Journals / ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Comparing The Effect of Under-Sampling and Over-Sampling on Traditional Machine Learning Algorithms for Epileptic Seizure Detection

Pages
279–285
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall results showed us that Random Forest algorithm offered superior performance than others for all scenarios in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity metrics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Epilepsy disease, a neurological disorder that causes recurrent and sudden crises, occurs at unforeseen times.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The performances of the machine learning algorithms were evaluated on the dataset extracted from electroencephalogram signals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall results showed us that Random Forest algorithm offered superior performance than others for all scenarios in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity metrics.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Epilepsy disease, a neurological disorder that causes recurrent and sudden crises, occurs at unforeseen times. This study presents the classification of electroencephalogram signals for epileptic seizure prediction. The performances of the machine learning algorithms were evaluated on the dataset extracted from electroencephalogram signals. The dataset consists of brain activities for 23.5 seconds of 500 individuals with each has 178 data points for one second, and totally of 11500 pieces of information. In this study, since the aim was to develop a model to predict epileptic seizure, the problem was transformed into a two-class problem by combining target categories except than epileptic seizure. Since combined target categories made the dataset unbalanced, Random Under Sampling and Random Over Sampling methods were applied to prevent the machine learning algorithms from overfitting the dominant class. Thus, each of the three datasets was divided into training and test sets by ratios of 60/40, 70/30, 80/20. The performance of the several machine learning algorithms were evaluated and discussed through three different scenarios. Overall results showed us that Random Forest algorithm offered superior performance than others for all scenarios in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity metrics.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYOL, K., ATİLA, Ü. (2020). Comparing The Effect of Under-Sampling and Over-Sampling on Traditional Machine Learning Algorithms for Epileptic Seizure Detection. ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 279–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/354844

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. B. Sharif and A. H. Jafari, “Prediction of epileptic seizures from EEG using analysis of ictal rules on Poincaré plane”, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 145, pp. 11-22, 2017
  2. E. Caplan, I. Dey, A. Scammell, K. Burnage, S.P. Paul, “Recognition and management of seizures in children in emergency departments”, Emergency Nurse, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 30-38, 2016
  3. O. Kocadagli, R. Langari, “Classification of EEG signals for epileptic seizures using hybrid artificial neural networks based wavelet transforms and fuzzy relations”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 88, pp. 419-434, 2017
  4. H. Chu, C.K. Chung, W. Jeong, K.H. Cho, “Predicting epileptic seizures from scalp EEG based on attractor state analysis”, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 143, pp. 75-87, 2017
  5. Z. Mohammadpoory, M. Nasrolahzadeh, J. Haddadnia, “Epileptic seizure detection in EEGs signals based on the weighted visibility graph entropy”, Seizure, vol. 50, pp. 202-208, 2017
  6. T. Wan, M. Wu, X. Lai, X. Wan, J. She, Y. Du, “A four-stage localization method for epileptic seizure onset zones”, IFAC-Papers OnLine, vol. 50, no.1, pp. 4412-4417, 2017
  7. I. Kiral-Kornek, S. Roy, E. Nurse, B. Mashford, P. Karoly, T. Carroll, et al., “Epileptic Seizure Prediction Using Big Data and Deep Learning: Toward a Mobile System”, Ebiomedicine, vol. 27, pp. 103-111, 2018
  8. A.R. Hassan, A. Subasi, “Automatic identification of epileptic seizures from EEG signals using linear programming boosting”, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 136, pp. 65-77, 2016
  9. N.D. Truong, L. Kuhlmann, M.R. Bonyadi, J. Yang, A. Faulks, O. Kavehei, “Supervised learning in automatic channel selection for epileptic seizure detection”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 86, pp. 199-207, 2017
  10. J. Jia, B. Goparaju, J. Song, R. Zhang, M.B. Westover, “Automated identification of epileptic seizures in EEG signals based on phase space representation and statistical features in the CEEMD domain”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 38, pp. 148-157, 2017
  11. N.S. Tawfik, S.M. Youssef, M. Kholief, “A hybrid automated detection of epileptic seizures in EEG records”, Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 177-190, 2015
  12. D. Gajic, Z. Djurovic, S.D. Gennaro, F. Gustafsson, “Classification of eeg signals for detection of epileptic seizures based on wavelets and statistical pattern recognition”, Biomed. Eng. Appl. Basis. Commun, vol. 26, no. 2