Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Yetişkinlerde ön kol diyafizer atrofik kaynamamalarının intramedüller çivi ve modifiye Nicoll tekniği ile tedavisi

Treatment of diaphyseal forearm atrophic nonunions with intramedullary nails and modified Nicoll’s technique in adults

Pages
262–270
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing and tricorticocancellous iliac bone block grafting appears to be a technically easy and reliable procedure that enables early postoperative rehabilitation in the treatment of nonunion of the forearm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of tricorticocancellous autologous bone grafting with intramedullary forearm nails in the treatment of radius or ulna aseptic nonunion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 8 patients (mean age: 39 years; range: 19 to 55 years) who underwent plate-screw osteosynthesis for the treatment of nonunion (6 ulna, 2 radius) following forearm fracture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing and tricorticocancellous iliac bone block grafting appears to be a technically easy and reliable procedure that enables early postoperative rehabilitation in the treatment of nonunion of the forearm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of tricorticocancellous autologous bone grafting with intramedullary forearm nails in the treatment of radius or ulna aseptic nonunion. Methods: The study included 8 patients (mean age: 39 years; range: 19 to 55 years) who underwent plate-screw osteosynthesis for the treatment of nonunion (6 ulna, 2 radius) following forearm fracture. In all cases, the length of the applied tricortical graft was below 3 cm. Patients were evaluated using the visual analog scale, Grace and Eversmann scale and DASH score. Wrist flexion and extension and postoperative hand and forearm grip strength were assessed. Results: Graft incorporation and union was completed at a mean of 22 (range: 18 to 28) weeks. No patient had nonunion, deep infection or radioulnar synostosis. Follow-up ranged from 18 to 52 months. Radiographic union was achieved in all patients. Mean visual analog scale pain score was 1 (range: 0 to 3). Grace and Eversmann ratings were excellent in 5 and good in 3 patients. Mean DASH score was 10.7 (range: 1.7 to 21.7) points. Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing and tricorticocancellous iliac bone block grafting appears to be a technically easy and reliable procedure that enables early postoperative rehabilitation in the treatment of nonunion of the forearm.

Özet

Amaç:Bu çalışmanın amacı radius veya ulnada aseptik kaynamama gelişen olguların intramedüller ön kol çivileri ve trikortikokansellöz otolog kemik grefti ile tedavisinin sonuçlarını değerlendirmekti. Çalışma planı: Çalışmaya ön kol kırığı sonrası kaynamama (6 ulna, 2 radius) nedeniyle plak-vida ile osteosentez uygulanan 8 hasta (ortalama yaş: 39, dağılım: 19-55) alındı. Uygulanan trikortikal greftin uzunluğu tüm olgularda 3 cm’nin altında idi. Hastalar görsel analog skala, Grace ve Eversmann skalası ve DASH skoru ile değerlendirildiler. Bilek fleksiyon ve ekstansiyonu ile ameliyat sonrası el ve ön kol kavrama kuvvetleri incelendi. Bulgular: Greft inkorporasyonu ve kaynamanın 22 (dağılım: 18-28) haftada tamamlandığı görüldü. Hastaların hiçbirinde kaynamama, derin enfeksiyon veya radyoulnar sinostoz bulgusu yoktu. Takip süresi 18 ile 52 ay arasındaydı. Kaynama tüm hastalarda radyografilerle doğrulandı. Ortalama görsel analog skala ağrı puanı 1 (dağılım: 0-3) olarak belirlendi. Grace ve Eversmann skorları 5 hastada mükemmel, 3 hastada iyi idi. Ortalama DASH skoru ise 10.7 (dağılım: 1.7-21.7) olarak kaydedildi. Çıkarımlar: Ön kol kaynamamalarının intramedüller çivi ve trikortikokansellöz iliak kemik blok greftlemesi ile tedavisi teknik açıdan basit, ameliyat sonrası erken dönemde rehabilitasyona olanak sağlayan, güvenilir bir yöntemdir

🔖

Cite This Article

SAKA, G., SAĞLAM, N., KURTULMUŞ, T., AVCI, C. C., AKPINAR, F. (2014). Yetişkinlerde ön kol diyafizer atrofik kaynamamalarının intramedüller çivi ve modifiye Nicoll tekniği ile tedavisi. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 262–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/352265

References (10)

  1. Richard MJ, Ruch DS, Aldridge JM 3rd. Malunions and nonunions of the forearm. Hand Clin 2007;23:235-43
  2. Langkamer VG, Ackroyd CE. Internal fixation of fore- arm fractures in the 1980s: lessons to be learnt. Injury 1991;22:97-102. CrossRef 3. Hadden WA, Reschauer R, Seggl W. Results of AO plate fixation of forearm shaft fractures in adults. Injury 1983;15:44-52. CrossRef 4. Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. The effect of malunion on functional outcome after plate fixation of fractures of both bones of the forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1068-78
  3. Tarr RR, Garfinkel AI, Sarmiento A. The effects of angu- lar and rotational deformities of both bones of the fore- arm. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:65- 70
  4. Kloen P, Buijze GA, Ring D. Management of forearm nonunions: current concepts. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2012;7:1-11. CrossRef 7. Kloen P, Wiggers JK, Buijze GA. Treatment of diaphyseal non-unions of the ulna and radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010;130:1439-45. CrossRef 8. Moroni A, Caja VL, Sabato C, Rollo G, Zinghi G. Com- posite bone grafting and plate fixation for the treatment of nonunions of the forearm with segmental bone loss: a report of eight cases. J Orthop Trauma 1995;9:419-26 9. Moroni A, Rollo G, Guzzardella M, Zinghi G. Surgical treatment of isolated forearm non-union with segmental bone loss. Injury 1997;28:497-504. CrossRef 10. Ring D, Allende C, Jafarnia K, Allende BT, Jupiter JB. Ununited diaphyseal forearm fractures with segmental defects: plate fixation and autogenous cancellous bone- grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:2440-5
  5. Faldini C, Miscione MT, Acri F, Chehrassan M, Bonomo M, Giannini S. Use of homologous bone graft in the treat- ment of aseptic forearm nonunion. Musculoskelet Surg 2011;95:31-5. CrossRef 12. Gupta DK, Kumar G. Gap nonunion of forearm bones treated by modified Nicoll’s technique. Indian J Orthop 2010;44(1):84-8
  6. Lloyd-Roberts GC. Experiences with boilded cadaveric bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1952;34-B:428-32
  7. Boyd HB. The treatment of difficult and unusual non- union. J Bone Joint Surg 1943;25:535
  8. Miller RC, Phalen GS. The repair of defects of the ra- dius with fibular bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1947;29:629-36
  9. Spira E. Bridging of bone defects in the forearm with iliac graft combined with intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1954;36-B:642-6
  10. Nicoll EA. The treatment of gaps in long bones by cancel- lous insert grafts. J Bone Jo