Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Percutaneous posterior fixation for degenerative spine problems

Dejeneratif omurga sorunlarında perkütan posterior fiksasyonH.

Pages
155–160
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we discussed the technical tips of percutaneous posterior fixation for degenerative spinal conditions and recommended methods in order to lower the risk of complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The minimally invasive approach in degenerative spine conditions has started to be more frequently used in the last 10 years in order to minimize the disadvantages that are related to the traditional open approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are a couple of advantages of using the minimally invasive approach as opposed to the traditional open approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we discussed the technical tips of percutaneous posterior fixation for degenerative spinal conditions and recommended methods in order to lower the risk of complications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The minimally invasive approach in degenerative spine conditions has started to be more frequently used in the last 10 years in order to minimize the disadvantages that are related to the traditional open approach. There are a couple of advantages of using the minimally invasive approach as opposed to the traditional open approach. Incisions are small and require minimal muscle dissection and retraction. Surgical procedures, including instrumentation, can be performed through a tubular retractor. In this review, we discussed the technical tips of percutaneous posterior fixation for degenerative spinal conditions and recommended methods in order to lower the risk of complications.

Özet

Geleneksel yaklaşıma bağlı dezavantajları azaltmak için dejeneratif omurga sorunlarında minimal invazif cerrahi teknikler son 10 yılda daha sık olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Minimal invazif spinal cerrahinin geleneksel açık cerrahiye göre birçok avantajı vardır. İnsizyonlar küçüktür ve minimal kas disseksiyonu ve retraksiyonu gerekir. Enstrumantasyon da dahil olmak üzere cerrahi prosedürlerin çoğunluğu bir tübüler retraktörün içinden rahatlıkla yapılabilmektedir. Bu derlemede, minimal invazif omurga cerrahisi yöntemlerinden biri olan perkütan posterior fiksasyonun dejeneratif omurga sorunlarında uygulamalarına yönelik teknik bilgiler ve komplikasyonlardan korunmanın yolları vurgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKEN, Y., ERDEM, M. N., BURÇ, H., SAKA, G., AYDOĞAN, M. (2014). Percutaneous posterior fixation for degenerative spine problems. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 155–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/213260

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, Mendoza N, O’Neill K, Van Dellen J Hughes SP. Back pain and instability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 2004; 54(6): 1413-1420
  2. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 98-105
  3. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Gejo R, Tsuji H. Preventive measures of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats. Spine 1998; 23(21): 2282- 2287
  4. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Sudo H, Abe Y, Minami A. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2012: 21; 1171-1177
  5. Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Pola E, Scaramuzzo L, Tamburrelli FC. A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (Suppl-1): S41-5
  6. Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, Richards S, Kahn N, Zadeh JA. The impact of self- retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 2002; 27: 2758-2762.