SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion

Anterıor lomber ınterbody füzyon

Halil BURÇ
Gürsel SAKA
Yener ERKEN
Mehmet AYDOĞAN
Pages
247–252
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the review, technical details and protection from complications are underlined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Anterior lomber interbody fusion is developing parallel with industrial development during last 20 years and becoming gold standard of fusion at level of L2-L5.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Advantages of technique are incredibly increasing with learning the technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the review, technical details and protection from complications are underlined.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Anterior lomber interbody fusion is developing parallel with industrial development during last 20 years and becoming gold standard of fusion at level of L2-L5. Advantages of technique are incredibly increasing with learning the technique. Complications related to approach are decreasing with learning curve and becoming to make technique feasible. In the review, technical details and protection from complications are underlined.

Özet

Anterior lomber interbody füzyon tekniği son 20 yıl içerisinde endüstrinin gelişimi ile paralellik göstererek günümüzde L2-L5 seviyesinde popüleritesini arttırmaktadır. Tekniğin uygulamasında ustalaşılması ile beraberinde getirdiği avantajlar yadsınmayacak derecededir. Tekniğe bağlı komplikasyonların öğrenme eğrisi ile azalması bu tekniği uygulanabilir kılmaktadır. Bu derlemede ALİF ile ilgili teknik detayları ve komplikasyonlardan korunmanın yolları vurgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BURÇ, H., SAKA, G., ERKEN, Y., AYDOĞAN, M. (2013). Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 247–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/214373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ. Vascular in- jury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1993; 18: 2227- 2230
  2. Calandruccio RA, Benton BF. Anterior lumbar fu- sion. Clin Orthop 1964; 35:63-68
  3. Capener N. Spondylolisthesis. Br J Surg 1932; 19: 374-386
  4. Faundez AA, Schwender JD, Safriel Y, Gilbert TJ, Mehbod AA, Denis F, Transfeldt EE, Wroblewski JM. Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior–posterior fusion versus trans- foraminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective com- parative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 203–211
  5. Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, Vieth V, Schneider M, Liljenqvist U. Transforaminal lumbar in- terbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 551–558
  6. Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, Liu JC. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar inter- body fusion: implications for the restoration of forami- nal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7: 379-386
  7. Jacobs WC, Vreeling A, De Kleuver M. Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 391–402
  8. Kasliwal MK, Deutsch H. Anhidrosis after ante- rior retroperitoneal approach for L4-L5 artificial disc re- placement. J Clin Neurosci 2011; 18(7): 990-991
  9. Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee SH, Jung B, Choi YG, Jeon SH, Lee HY Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fu- sion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolis- thesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 114–121
  10. Kozak JA, Heilman AE, O’Brien JP. Anterior lumbar fusion options: technique and graft materials. Clin Orthop 1994; 300: 45-51
  11. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion: history, techniques, and 2- year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multi- center trial. Spine 1998; 23: 1267-1278
  12. Lee SH, Choi WG, Lim SR, Kang HY, Shin SW. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion fol- lowed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine J 2004; 4: 644–649
  13. Madan SS, Harley JM, Boeree NR. Anterior lumbar inter- body fusion: does stable anterior fixation matter? Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 386–392
  14. Madhu TS. Posterior and a