Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

LEARNING FROM CUSTOMER EXPERIENCES: INTELLIGENT FAILURES STRONG BRANDS

MÜŞTERİ DENEYİMLERİNDEN ÖĞRENME: AKILLI HATALAR GÜÇLÜ MARKALAR

Pages
730–751
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it is expected that this study will contribute to empirical and experimental studies on learning from failures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Failures are not always the outcome of an imperfect engineering, design or sales activity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While there are hundreds of bad movies that have reached cult status by movie lovers and have achieved great financial success, there are hundreds of better movies that were a failure at box office.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it is expected that this study will contribute to empirical and experimental studies on learning from failures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Failures are not always the outcome of an imperfect engineering, design or sales activity. While there are hundreds of bad movies that have reached cult status by movie lovers and have achieved great financial success, there are hundreds of better movies that were a failure at box office. In this sense, it is very important for brands to identify, analyze and consciously experience their negative actions that cause dissatisfaction with the targetted market. However, despite the growing belief that failures will produce valuable and unique new knowledge, it is often stated that there is not much proceeded on this area to explain the learning process from failures and that more research is needed. The purpose of this study is, by examining various brand stories; i) presenting a road map of how businesses can use failures as a source of learning so as not to go into rigor mortis in businesses, ii) revealing elements that prevent the development of learning skills from failures, and iii) discovering ways to overcome these obstacles. Thus, it is expected that this study will contribute to empirical and experimental studies on learning from failures.

Özet

Hatalar her zaman mükemmel olmayan bir mühendislik, tasarım veya satış faaliyetlerinin sonucu olarak meydana gelmez. Sinemaseverler tarafından kült film statüsüne kavuşmuş ve büyük bir maddi başarıya erişmiş yüzlerce kötü film varken, gişede hüsrana uğrayan yüzlerce iyi film vardır. Bu anlamda markaların hedef kitlede memnuniyetsizliğe yol açan negatif eylemlerini tanımlaması, analiz etmesi ve bilinçli deneyimlerde bulunması çok önemlidir. Ancak hataların değerli ve eşsiz yeni bilgiler üreteceğine dair inancın artmasına rağmen, hatalardan öğrenme sürecini açıklamada çok fazla yol alınamadığı ve daha fazla araştırmaya ihtiyaç duyulduğu sıklıkla belirtilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; çeşitli marka hikayeleri incelenerek i) işletmelerin ölüm katılığına düşmemek için öğrenmenin kaynağı olarak hataları nasıl kullanabileceğine dair yol haritası sunmak, ii) hatalardan öğrenme becerisi geliştirmeye engel olan unsurları ortaya çıkarmak ve iii) bu engellerin üstesinden gelme yollarını keşfetmektir. Böylelikle hatalardan öğrenme davranışına ilişkin ampirik ve deneysel çalışmalara katkı sağlanacağı umulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENTÜRK, H. A. (2018). LEARNING FROM CUSTOMER EXPERIENCES: INTELLIGENT FAILURES STRONG BRANDS. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 730–751. https://ajindex.com/articles/352064

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E. ve Unnava, H. R. (2000), “Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment”, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 203-214.
  2. Ahluwalia, R., Unnava, H. R. ve Burnkrant, R. E. (2001), “The moderating role of commitment on the spillover effect of marketing communications”, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 458-470.
  3. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II ‐ Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA. Argote, L. ve Epple, D. (1996), “Learning curves in manufacturing”, Science, 247, 920-924.
  4. Arino, A. ve Torre J. (1998), “Learning from failure: Towards an evoluationary model of collaborative ventures”, Organization Science, 9(3), 306-325.
  5. Baumard, P. ve Starbuck, W. H. (2005), “Learning from failures: Why it may not happen”, Long Range Planning, 38, 281-298.
  6. Brand Finance (2017) Global 500 The Annual Report on the World’s Most Valuable Brands, http://brandfinance.com/images/upload/global_500_2017_locked_website.pdf.
  7. Burleson, W. ve Picard, R. (2004), “Affective Agents: Sustaining Motivation to Learn Through Failure and a State of ‘Stuck’”, Workshop on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments. 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceio - Alagoas, Brazil. Cannon, M. ve Edmondson, A. C. (2001), “Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 161-177. Cannon D. M. & Edmondson, A. C. (2005), “Failing to learn and learning to fail (Intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve”, Long Range Planning, 38, 299-319.
  8. Carmeli, A. (2007), “Social capital, psychological safety and learning behaviours from failure in organizations”, Long Range Planning, 40, 30-44.
  9. Carmeli, A., Tishler, A. ve Edmondson, A. C. (2012), “CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure”, Strategic Organization, 10(1), 31-54.
  10. Chiesa, V. & Frattini, F. (2011), “Commercializing technological innovation: Learning from failures in high‐tech markets”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 437-454.
  11. Cyert, M. R. ve March, J. G. (1992). Antecedents of the Behavioral Theory of the Firm, New York: Oxford Univrsity Press.
  12. Day G. S. (1994), “The capabilities of market-driven firms. Journal of Marketing”, 58 (4), 37-52.
  13. Edmondson, C. A. (