SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Dynamic Rules of Action, Market Knowledge Absorptive Capacity and Firm Innovativeness: An Empirical Analysis

Dinamik Örgütsel Kurallar, Pazar Bilgisi Özümseme Kapasitesi ve Firma Yenilikçiliği: Ampirik Bir İnceleme

HALİT KESKİN
HAYAT AYAR ŞENTÜRK
Pages
115–134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, we show that market knowledge AC influences firm performance via firm innovativeness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of market knowledge absorptive capacity AC is one of the dynamic capabilities that a firm has which is crucial for market success of the organization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By investigating 241 firms, this paper indicates that a dynamic rules of action are positively associated with market knowledge AC variables, b market knowledge AC is positively related to firm innovativeness, c firm innovativeness is positively associated with firm performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, we show that market knowledge AC influences firm performance via firm innovativeness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dinamik Örgütsel Kurallar · Pazar Bilgisi · Özümseme Kapasitesi

Abstract

The concept of market knowledge absorptive capacity AC is one of the dynamic capabilities that a firm has which is crucial for market success of the organization. However, the effect of market knowledge AC on the firm innovativeness i.e. product and process and the impact of dynamic rules of action embedded in organizational structure and behaviors on this capacity is interestingly missing in the AC literature. By investigating 241 firms, this paper indicates that a dynamic rules of action are positively associated with market knowledge AC variables, b market knowledge AC is positively related to firm innovativeness, c firm innovativeness is positively associated with firm performance. In addition, we show that market knowledge AC influences firm performance via firm innovativeness.

Özet

Pazar bilgisi özümseme kapasitesi bir firmanın pazar başarısı için önemli olan dinamik yeteneklerinden biridir. Ancak ilginç olarak pazar bilgisi özümseme kapasitesinin firma yenilikçiliği üzerindeki etkisi ve örgütün yapı ve davranışlarında gömülü olan dinamik örgütsel kuralların bu kapasite üzerindeki etkisi literatürde incelenmemiştir. Bu çalışma 241 firmayı analiz ederek a dinamik örgütsel kuralların pazar bilgisi özümseme kapasitesini oluşturan her bir değişken ile pozitif ilişkili olduğunu, b pazar bilgisi özümseme kapasitesinin firma yenilikçiliği ile pozitif ilişkili olduğunu ve c firma yenilikçiliğinin firma performansı ile pozitif ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, pazar bilgisi özümseme kapasitesinin firma performansını firma yenilikçiliğinin aracılığıyla etkilediği de gösterilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, H., ŞENTÜRK, H. A. (2017). Dynamic Rules of Action, Market Knowledge Absorptive Capacity and Firm Innovativeness: An Empirical Analysis. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 115–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/125892

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction. Research Policy 14(1), 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6
  2. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. C. (2014). Complex Adaptive Systems Theory and Firm Product Innovativeness. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 31, 21-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.09.003
  3. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2009).
  4. Organizational Emotional Capability, Product and Process Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 26(3), 103-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jengtecman.2009.06.008 Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 411–423. Retrieved from http://www3.nd.edu/~kyuan/courses/sem/readpapers/ANDERSON.pdf
  5. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1995). An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 275-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(95)00027-Q
  6. Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/2393203 Baron R., & Kenny D. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  7. Brief, A.P., & Downey, H. K. (1983). Cognitive and Organizational Structures: A Conceptual Analysis of Implicit Design Theories. Human Relations, 36(12), 1065–1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872678303601201
  8. Bruni, D. S., & Verona, G. (2009). Dynamic Marketing Capabilities in Science-Based Firms: An Exploratory Investigation of the Pharmaceutical Industry. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 101-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00615.x
  9. Brown, K., Schmied, H., & Tarondeau, J. C. (2003). Success Factors in R&D: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature and Derived Implications for Design Management. Design Management Journal, 2(1), 72–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7177.2002.tb00013.x
  10. Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009). The Positive Effects of Relationship Learning and Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Performance and Competitive Advantage in Industrial http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.003 Marketing Ma