Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

İŞGÖREN İNOVASYON DAYANIKLILIĞI: ÇOK BOYUTLU YAPI İÇİN BİR ÖNERİ

EMPLOYEE INNOVATION RESILIENCE: A PROPOSAL FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONSTRUCT

Pages
290–308
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to lack of any measurement scale in employee innovation resilience, in this study, we aim at proposing a model that presents innovation resilience as a second order multidimensional construct that consists of three dimensions and three sub-dimensions of each observable variables

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As being one of the prominent phenomenon in ecology, engineering and pyschology studies for more than thirty years, resilience has started to gain attraction and attention in management and organization fields in the last decade.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The concept is accepted as an antidote of invulnerability (Weick, 1993), adaptive functioning against risk hazards (Rutter, 1987) and ability to cope with multiple changes (Boyd and Folke, 2012).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to lack of any measurement scale in employee innovation resilience, in this study, we aim at proposing a model that presents innovation resilience as a second order multidimensional construct that consists of three dimensions and three sub-dimensions of each observable variables
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As being one of the prominent phenomenon in ecology, engineering and pyschology studies for more than thirty years, resilience has started to gain attraction and attention in management and organization fields in the last decade. The concept is accepted as an antidote of invulnerability (Weick, 1993), adaptive functioning against risk hazards (Rutter, 1987) and ability to cope with multiple changes (Boyd and Folke, 2012). Resilience is either defined as set of available and accessible behaviors over time that reflects growth (Ungar; 2010,2011) or as the maintenance of positive adjustment under challenging conditions (Vogus and Sutcliffe, 2007), it fosters the strenght and the survival of the organism. Resilience could be accepted in its infancy in management and organization studies, however, it has a great potential to understand how employees in organizations endure ongoing changes, challenges and uncertainty that reveal through innovation and its potential effects on innovation performance. Due to lack of any measurement scale in employee innovation resilience, in this study, we aim at proposing a model that presents innovation resilience as a second order multidimensional construct that consists of three dimensions and three sub-dimensions of each observable variables

Özet

Son otuz yıldır ekoloji, mühendislik ve psikoloji alanlarında öne çıkan kavramlardan biri olan dayanıklılık, yönetim ve organizasyon alanında da son on yıldır dikkat çekmeye başlamıştır. Kavram literatürde; kırılganlığın panzehiri (Weick, 1993), risklerden kaynaklanan tehlikelere uyumlanarak işleme (Rutter, 1987), ve çoklu değişikliklerle baş edebilme becerisi (Boyd ve Folke, 2012) olarak kabul edilmektedir. Dayanıklılık, ister zamanla büyümeyi etkileyen elverişli ve ulaşılabilir davranışlar setine, isterse zorlayıcı koşullara sürekli olumlu bir biçimde alışmaya işaret etsin, organizamanın gücünü ve yaşamsal şansını arttırmaktadır. Yönetim ve organizasyon çalışmalarında başlangıç aşamasında olduğu kabul edilse de kavram, işgörenlerin örgüt içinde devam eden ve inovasyon aracılığıyla ortaya çıkan değişimlere, zorluklara ve belirsizliklere nasıl dayandıklarını ve söz konusu dayanıklılıklarının inovasyon performansları üzerindeki etkisinin ne olduğunu açıklama eğilimindedir. İşgören inovasyon dayanıklılığı ile ilgili bir ölçme aracı olmaması nedeniyle, bu çalışmada inovasyon dayanıklılığı üç boyutlu ve her üç boyutununda üçer alt boyutttan oluşan üst düzeyli bir ölçme modeli olarak önerilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, G., ARAZA, A. (2015). İŞGÖREN İNOVASYON DAYANIKLILIĞI: ÇOK BOYUTLU YAPI İÇİN BİR ÖNERİ. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 290–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/352018

References (18)

  1. Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 333-346.
  2. Amir, M. T., Standen, P. (2011). Employee resilience in organisations: Development of a new scale. Paper presented at the 26th Australian New Zealand Academy of Management Conference. Ballout, H. I. (2009). Career commitment and career success: moderating role of self-efficacy. Career Development International, 14(7), 655-670.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215.
  4. Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in behaviour research and therapy, 1(4), 237-269.
  5. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287.
  6. Bardoel, E. A., Pettit, T. M., De Cieri, H., McMillan, L. (2014). Employee resilience: an emerging challenge for HRM. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 52(3), 279-297.
  7. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. (2011). Self-regulation and the executive function of the self. In Mark R. Leary, June Price Tangney (eds.) 2nd Edition,
  8. Handbook of self and identity, NewYork, Guilford Press, (pp.180-197).
  9. Block, J.,Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 349-361.
  10. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience. American Psychologist, 59, 20-28.
  11. Boyd, E., C. Folke (2012).
  12. Adapting Institutions, Adaptive Governance and Complexity: An Introduction. In: Boyd, E. and C. Folke (eds.). Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity and Social-Ecological Resilience. Cambridge University Press,
  13. Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-8.
  14. Chakravarthy, B. S. (1982). Adaptation: A promising metaphor for strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 35-44.
  15. Chen, C. J., and Huang, J. W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance-The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104-114.
  16. Chiang, C. F., and Jang, S. S. (2008). An expectancy theory model for hotel employee motivation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 313-322.
  17. Child, J. (1997). Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1), 43-76.
  18. Clegg, S. (1990). Modern Organizations: Organization studies in