Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 22

A REVIEW OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACTIVITIES AT UNIVERSITIES

Üniversitelerde Gerçekleşen Girişimcilik Faaliyetlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
119–129
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this study is to discuss and classify the related concepts of entrepreneurship activities at university level

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Changes and transformations in global environment in company with technological developments has affected individuals, institutions, countries significantly both in economic, social and cultural fields.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore public, private and third sector organizations apparently are in need restructuring themselves in the light of these developments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this study is to discuss and classify the related concepts of entrepreneurship activities at university level
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Girişimcilik · Üniversite Girişimciliği · Akademik Girişimcilik

Abstract

Changes and transformations in global environment in company with technological developments has affected individuals, institutions, countries significantly both in economic, social and cultural fields. Therefore public, private and third sector organizations apparently are in need restructuring themselves in the light of these developments. Entrepreneurship is a prominent concept that has become the focal point of the public, private and third sector actors in previously mentioned restructuring process. The purpose of this study is to discuss and classify the related concepts of entrepreneurship activities at university level

Özet

Teknolojik gelişmelerin beraberinde küresel çevrede yaşanan değişim ve dönüşümler; bireyleri ve örgütleri ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel alanda derinden etkilemektedir. Buna bağlı olarak kamu, özel ve üçüncü sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren kuruluşlarında kendilerini bu gelişmeler ışığında yeniden yapılandırma ihtiyacı duydukları anlaşılmaktadır. Girişimcilik, söz konusu yeniden yapılandırma sürecinde öne çıkan kavramların başında yer almakta; kamu, özel ve üçüncü sektör aktörleri tarafından odak noktası haline gelerek yoğun olarak tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite bağlamında girişimcilik kavramını kendi sınırları ve kısıtları içerisinde detaylarıyla inceleyerek, üniversite düzeyinde gerçekleşen girişimcilik faaliyetleri hakkındaki bilgi paylaşımını detaylarıyla incelemektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, Ç., ASLAN, G. (2014). A REVIEW OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACTIVITIES AT UNIVERSITIES. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 22, 119–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/170306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aldrich, H. E. (2012). The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: a personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 41(7), 1240-1248.
  2. Alexander, U., Evgeniy, P. (2012). The entrepreneurial university in Russia: from idea to reality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 45-51.
  3. Alpan, G., Efil, İ (2011). Bir yönetim modeli önerisi: Toplam entropi yönetimi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(1), 53-87.
  4. Bramwell, A., Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: the entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(8), 1175-1187.
  5. Burnett, S. A., Huisman, J. (2010). Universities’ responses to globalisation: the influence of organisational culture. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(2), 117-142.
  6. Duval-Couetil, N. (2013). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programs: challenges and approaches. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 394-409.
  7. Erol, M. (2001). Sosyal Entropi’nin verimlilik üzerindeki etkileri. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 127-143.
  8. Gaffikin, F., Morrissey, M. (2008). A new synergy for universities: redefining academy as an ‘engaged institution’. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 97-116.
  9. Glassman, A. M., Moore, R. W., Rossy, G. L., Neupert, K., Napier, N. K., Jones, D. E., Harvey, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4), 353- 374. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045-1057.
  10. Jones, C., Matlay, H. (2011). Understanding the heterogeneity of entrepreneurship education: going beyond Gartner. Education + Training, 53 (8/9), 692-703.
  11. Klofsten, M. (2000). Training entrepreneurship at universities: a Swedish case. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6), 337-344.
  12. Klofsten, M., Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14 (4), 299-315.
  13. Kuratko, D. F. (2005).The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577-598.
  14. Lazzeroni, M. (2001). Introduzione all’innovazione territoriale. In Lanzara, R., Lazzeroni, M. (a cura di), Metodologie per L’innovazione Territoriale.Un progetto sperimentale nelle aree di Pisa, Benevento, Brindisi e Lecce. (1ª edizione, p. 11-29).
  15. Milano, Franco Angeli. Lazzeroni, M.