Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

FİNANS SEKTÖRÜNDE ETKİLİ RİSK YÖNETİMİ İÇİN PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME VE BAŞARISIZLIK TAHMİNİ: BÜTÜNLEŞİK BİR KARAR VERME PROSEDÜRÜ

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND DISTRESS PREDICTION FOR EFFECTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT IN FINANCE SECTOR: AN INTEGRATED DECISION MAKING PROCEDURE

Pages
58–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To this aim, 44 commercial bank s operating in Turk ish financial sector are asse s se d a s healthy and non-healthy by using 57 selected fundamental financial ratios to provide a comprehensive in si g h t t o the bank managers, investors, government units and rating agencies to predict the financial performances of bank s and mak e related decisions when a risk y socio-economic environment is a matter of a country.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Considering its important role in the socio-economic status of the developing countries, fina n c e se c t o r, which is one of the core components of the service sector, is the focus of this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main drivers of this st u d y are, to explore the most significant factors influencing the performance of the financial institutions in a risk y environment, to evaluate the economic and financial performances using the selected factors and predict the future distress/bankruptcy possibility of the institutions by a comparative analysis employing a quantitative three step decision mak ing procedure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To this aim, 44 commercial bank s operating in Turk ish financial sector are asse s se d a s healthy and non-healthy by using 57 selected fundamental financial ratios to provide a comprehensive in si g h t t o the bank managers, investors, government units and rating agencies to predict the financial performances of bank s and mak e related decisions when a risk y socio-economic environment is a matter of a country.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Considering its important role in the socio-economic status of the developing countries, fina n c e se c t o r, which is one of the core components of the service sector, is the focus of this study. The main drivers of this st u d y are, to explore the most significant factors influencing the performance of the financial institutions in a risk y environment, to evaluate the economic and financial performances using the selected factors and predict the future distress/bankruptcy possibility of the institutions by a comparative analysis employing a quantitative three step decision mak ing procedure. To explore the viability of the proposed approach, an up-to-date and comprehensive application on commercial banks operating in Turk ish Bank ing sector is presented by using a wide range of financial ratios. To this aim, 44 commercial bank s operating in Turk ish financial sector are asse s se d a s healthy and non-healthy by using 57 selected fundamental financial ratios to provide a comprehensive in si g h t t o the bank managers, investors, government units and rating agencies to predict the financial performances of bank s and mak e related decisions when a risk y socio-economic environment is a matter of a country.

Özet

Gelişmekte olan ülkelerin sosyo-ekonomik statüsünde önemli bir yere sahip olan ve hizmet sek tö rü n ü n temel bileşenlerinden biri olan finans sektörü bu çalışman ın temel konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amaçları; riskli ortamlarda finansal kurumların performansını etkileyecek en önemli faktörlerin belirlenmesi, bu faktörler kullanılarak ekonomik ve finansal performansın değerlendirilmesi ve kurumların gelecekteki başarı/başarısızlık durumlarının üç aşamalı analitik ve karşılaştırmalı bir karar verme yaklaşımı kullanılarak tahmin edilmesidir. Sunulan yaklaşımın uygulanabilirliği Türk bankacılık sektöründe faaliyet gösteren ticari bankaların konu alındığı kapsamlı bir uygulama üzerinde çok sayıda finansal rasyo k u llan ıla rak gösterilecektir. Bu amaçla, Türk finans sektöründe faaliyet gösteren 44 ticari banka 57 temel finansal rasyo kullanılarak sınıflandırılacaktır. Sunulan yaklaşımın banka yöneticilerine, yatırımcılara, hükümet birimlerin e ve derecelendirme kuruluşlarına bankaların finansal performanslarının tahminlenmesi ve riskli sosyo -ekonomik ortamlarda karar verilmesi için kapsamlı bir bakış açısı sunması hedeflenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELİM, H., BALAMAN, Ş. Y. (2017). FİNANS SEKTÖRÜNDE ETKİLİ RİSK YÖNETİMİ İÇİN PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME VE BAŞARISIZLIK TAHMİNİ: BÜTÜNLEŞİK BİR KARAR VERME PROSEDÜRÜ. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 58–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/351995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abu-Alkheil, A.M., Burghof, H-P., & Khan, W.A. (2013). Comparative performance of Islamic and conventional banks in Europe. American Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(1), 1 - 23. Alam, P., Booth, D., Lee, K., & Thordarson T. (2000). The use of fuzzy clustering algorithm and self-organizing neural networks for identifying potentially failing banks: an experimental study. Expert Systems with Applications, 18(3), 185-199.
  2. Alper, D. & Anbar, A. (2011). Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(2), 139-152.
  3. Altman, E. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 589-609.
  4. Baidya, M.K., & Mitra, D. (2012). An analysis of the technical efficiency of Indian public sector banks through DEA approach. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 13 (3/4), 341 - 365. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Models for the Estimation of Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
  5. Bayyurt, N. (2013). Ownership Effect on Bank's Performance: Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches on Foreign and Domestic Turkish Banks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 919-928.
  6. Betz, F., Oprica, S., Peltonen, T.A., & Sarlin, P. (2014). Predicting distress in European banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, 225-241.
  7. Boyacioglu, M.A., Kara, Y., & Baykan, Ö.K. (2009). Predicting bank financial failures using neural networks, support vector machines and multivariate statistical methods: A comparative analysis in the sample of savings deposit insurance fund (SDIF) transferred banks in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 3355-3366.
  8. Canbaş, S., & Erol, C. (1985). Türkiye'de Ticaret Bankaları Sorunlarının Saptanması: Erken Uyarı Sistemine Giriş. Türkiye Ekonomisi ve Türk Ekonomi İlmi, 1, Marmara Üniversitesi Türkiye Ekonomi Araştırma Merkezi. Canbas, S., Cabuk, A., & Kilic, S.B. (2005). Prediction of commercial bank failure via multivariate statistical analysis of financial structures: The Turkish case. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 528-546.
  9. Chen, T. (2005). A measurement of Taiwan's bank efficiency and productivity change during the Asian financial crisis. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 6(6), 525 - 543. Celik, A.E., & Karatepe, Y. (2007). Evaluating and forecasting