SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Astım Allerji İmmünoloji / 2020 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

New Dimension in Inhaler Technical Training: Puzzle

Ahmet KAN
Tuğçe TURAL KARA
Pages
59–65
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Large-scale and multicenter studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of puzzles in other disciplines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of group trainings for using inhaler drugs with a spacer with a game (puzzle) after face-to-facetraining and the satisfaction of health care professionals in a second-line hospital.Materials and Methods: Participants completed the post-training satisfaction questionnaire after both face-to-face and practicaltraining.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A cross-sectional, quasi-experimental study was performed.Results: A total of 102 participants were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Large-scale and multicenter studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of puzzles in other disciplines.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of group trainings for using inhaler drugs with a spacer with a game (puzzle) after face-to-facetraining and the satisfaction of health care professionals in a second-line hospital.Materials and Methods: Participants completed the post-training satisfaction questionnaire after both face-to-face and practicaltraining. A cross-sectional, quasi-experimental study was performed.Results: A total of 102 participants were included in the study. After the face-to-face training, the most common inhaler error wasnot shaking the inhaler tube before inhalation. The rate of participants who received a full score after face-to-face training (total 7points) increased to 91.2% from 49% after puzzle practice (p 90%) assessed themselves as providing adequateinhaler training with a spacer and treatment to the patients. In addition, the participants thought that the puzzle was highly instructive,interesting, and a facilitator for learning.Conclusion: The puzzle can be used as a complementary tool for face-to-face training and it seems to be useful as a visual educationmaterial. Large-scale and multicenter studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of puzzles in other disciplines.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAN, A., KARA, T. T. (2020). New Dimension in Inhaler Technical Training: Puzzle. Astım Allerji İmmünoloji, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 59–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/351222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2019. Available at: http://www. Ginaasthma.org/
  2. Bell J, Newman S. The rejuvenated pressurised metered dose inhaler. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2007;4:215-34
  3. Demirkan K, Tolley E, Mastin T, Soberman J, Burbeck J, Self T. Salmeterol administration by metered-dose inhaler alone vs metered-dose inhaler plus valved holding chamber. Chest 2000; 117(5):1314-8
  4. Dominelli GS, Dominelli PB, Rathgeber SL, Webster SB. Effect of different single-session educational modalities on improving medical students’ ability to demonstrate proper pressurized metered dose inhaler technique. J Asthma 2012;49(4): 434-9
  5. Self TH, Arnold LB, Czosnowski LM, Swanson JM, Swanson H. Inadequate skill of healthcare professionals in using asthma inhalation devices. J Asthma 2007;44(8):593-8
  6. Duerden M, Price DB. Training issues in the use of inhalers. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001;9(2):75-87
  7. Lee-Wong M, Mayo PH. Results of a programme to improve house staff use of metered dose inhalers and spacers. Postgrad Med J 2003;78(930):221-5
  8. Chafin CC, Tolley E, Demirkan K, Burbeck J, Self TH. Effect of a brief educational intervention on medical students’ use of asthma devices. J Asthma 2000;37(7):585-8
  9. Boctor L. Active-learning strategies: The use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study. Nurs Educ Pract 2013;13:96-100
  10. Randi MAF, Carvalho HF. Learning through role-playing games: An approach for active learning and teaching. Rev Bras Educ Med 2013;37:80-8
  11. Bailey CM, Hsu CT, DiCarlo SE. Educational puzzles for understanding gastrointestinal physiology. Am J Physiol 1999;21:1-18
  12. Urschler M, Meidl K, Browning S, Khan B, Milanick M. A kinaesthetic activity using LEGO bricks and buckets for illustrating the regulation of blood sugar. Adv Physiol Educ 2015;39:250-2
  13. Eckert GU, Da Rosa AC, Busnello RG, Melchior R, Masiero PR, Scroferneker ML. Learning from panel boards: T-lymphocyte and B-lymphocyte self-tolerance game. Med Teach 2004;26:521- 4
  14. Rodenbaugh DW, Lujan HL, Di Carlo SE. Learning by doing: Construction and manipulation of a skeletal muscle model during lecture. Adv Physiol Educ 2012;36:302-6
  15. Barclay SM, Jeffres MN, Bhakta R. Educational card games to teach pharmacotherapeutics in an advanced pharmacy practice experience. Am J Pharm Educ 2011;75:33
  16. Marcondes FK, Moura MJ, Sanches A, Costa R, de Lima PO, Groppo FC, et al