AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightThis view will be examined in regard to new provisions of bankruptcy composition that were introduced by the Act numbered 7101 and whether it is possible to retrocede bonds and checks or their remuneration to the debtor that were endorsed prior to bankruptcy composition period in regard to newly introduced Article 294 (6) of the Turkish Code of Enforcement and Bankruptcy.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Bonds and checks are promissory notes by law and their endorsement is considered as endorsement in full if not stated on the bill that the endorsement is for collection or of pawn which results in transfer of all rights arising from the bill. The subject of this article is the effect of bankruptcy composition respite on already endorsed legal instruments, especially on bonds and checks. Within the frame of postponement of bankruptcy, it was accepted by the Turkish Court of Cassation and prevailing view in literature that it was not possible to grant an interim injunction that would prevent a third party to exercise their rights. This view will be examined in regard to new provisions of bankruptcy composition that were introduced by the Act numbered 7101 and whether it is possible to retrocede bonds and checks or their remuneration to the debtor that were endorsed prior to bankruptcy composition period in regard to newly introduced Article 294 (6) of the Turkish Code of Enforcement and Bankruptcy.
Özet
Kanunen emre yazılı senetlerden olan bono ve çekin cirosu, senet üzerinde açıkça rehin veya tahsil amacıyla yapıldığı belirtilmemişse temlik cirosu olarak kabul edilir ve senetteki hakkın devri sonucunu doğurur. Bu çalışmada, konkordato mühleti verilmesinin devredilmiş kıymetli evrak, özellikle de çek ve bonolar, üzerindeki etkisi incelenecektir. İflâsın ertelenmesi kurumu bakımından Yargıtay ve doktrinde kabul edilen üçüncü kişilerin maddî hukuktan kaynaklı haklarını kullanmalarına engel olacak şekilde ihtiyatî tedbir verilemeyeceği yönündeki genel kabul, 7101 sayılı Kanunla getirilen konkordato hükümleri bakımından değerlendirilecek ve konkordato mühleti verilmeden önce bankalara temlik edilen bono ve çeklerin veya bedellerinin kredi müşterisine iadesinin mümkün olup olmadığı İsviçre İcra ve İflâs Kanunu örnek alınarak düzenlenen ve yeni bir hüküm olan İcra ve İflâs Kanunu’nun 294. maddesinin altıncı fıkrası da göz önünde bulundurularak irdelenecektir.