Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Effect of imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient and optimization strategies

Pages
101–107
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the phantom results and data simulations, DWI acquisition protocol can be optimized to obtain accurate ADC maps in routine clinical application for whole body imaging.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the effect of key imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffu-sion coefficient (ADC) maps using a phantom model combined with ADC calculation simulation and propose strategies to improve the accuracy of ADC quantification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODSDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences were acquired on a phantom model using sin-gle-shot echo-planar imaging DWI at 1.5 T scanner by varying key imaging parameters including number of averages (NEX), repetition time (TR), echo time (TE), and diffusion preparation pulses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the phantom results and data simulations, DWI acquisition protocol can be optimized to obtain accurate ADC maps in routine clinical application for whole body imaging.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the effect of key imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffu-sion coefficient (ADC) maps using a phantom model combined with ADC calculation simulation and propose strategies to improve the accuracy of ADC quantification. METHODSDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences were acquired on a phantom model using sin-gle-shot echo-planar imaging DWI at 1.5 T scanner by varying key imaging parameters including number of averages (NEX), repetition time (TR), echo time (TE), and diffusion preparation pulses. DWI signal simulations were performed for varying TR and TE.RESULTSMagnetic resonance diffusion signal and ADC maps were dependent on TR and TE imaging pa-rameters as well as number of diffusion preparation pulses, but not on the NEX. However, the choice of a long TR and short TE could be used to minimize their effects on the resulting DWI sequences and ADC maps. CONCLUSIONThis study shows that TR and TE imaging parameters affect the diffusion images and ADC maps, but their effect can be minimized by utilizing diffusion preparation pulses. Another key imaging parameter, NEX, is less relevant to DWI and ADC quantification as long as DWI signal-to-noise ratio is above a certain level. Based on the phantom results and data simulations, DWI acquisition protocol can be optimized to obtain accurate ADC maps in routine clinical application for whole body imaging.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A. (2016). Effect of imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient and optimization strategies. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 101–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/350115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imag- ing of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disor- ders. Radiology 1986; 161:401-407. [CrossRef] Mascalchi M, Filippi M, Floris R, et al. Diffu- sion-weighted MR of the brain: methodolo- gy and clinical application. Radiol Med 2005; 109:155-197.
  2. Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: Exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage 2012; 61:324-341. [CrossRef] Ulug AM, Beauchamp N, Bryan RN, et al. Abso- lute quantitation of diffusion constants in hu- man stroke. Stroke 1997; 284:83-90. [CrossRef] Warach S, Chien D, Li W, et al. Fast magnetic res- onance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke. Neurology 1992; 42:1717-1723. [CrossRef] Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG. Diffu- sion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiol- ogy 2000; 217:331-345. [CrossRef] Seo HS, Chang KH, Na DG, et al. High b-value diffusion (b=3000 s/mm2) MR imaging in ce- rebral gliomas at 3T: visual and quantitative comparisons with b=1000 s/mm2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:458-463. [CrossRef] Tsuchiya K, Honya K, Yoshida M, et al. Demon- stration of spinal cord and nerve root abnor- malities by diffusion neurography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32:286-290. [CrossRef] Yoshikawa T, Kawamitsu H, Mitchell DG, et al. ADC measurement of abdominal organs and le- sions using parallel imaging technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187:1522-1530. [CrossRef] Lauenstein TC, Semelka RC. Emerging tech- niques: whole-body screening and staging with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 489-498. [CrossRef] Türkbey B, Aras Ö, Karabulut N, et al. Diffu- sion-weighted MRI for detecting and mon- itoring cancer: a review of current applica- tions in body imaging. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012;18:46-59. [CrossRef] Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR im- aging of the liver. Radiology 2010; 254:47-66. [CrossRef] Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:172-178. [CrossRef] Oner AY, Celik H, Oktar SO, et al. Single breath- hold diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver with parallel imaging: initial experience. Clin Radiol 2006; 61:959-965. [CrossRef] Parikh T1, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. Focal liver le- sion detection and characterization with diffu- sion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 2008; 246: 812-822. [CrossRef] Koh