Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Determination of the standard values of the hand bone mineral density values in males according to ages

Erkeklerde el kemik mineral yoğunluğunun yaşlara göre standart değerlerinin saptanması

Pages
220–226
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Rheumatological diseases, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, tendon and nerve lacerations of hand and fore- arm, fractures of upper extremity and hemiplegy, that can causes local osteoporosis in the hand, measurement of hand BMD can be done by DXA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study we purposed to determine stan- dard values of hand Bone Mineral Density (BMD) accord- ing to ages by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in males who applied to our hospital, evaluate association of hand BMD with lumbar and femur BMD and search usefulness of hand BMD measurement by DXA.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Totally, 239 male included, whose ages dif- fer between 27 to 87 years, had no disease associated with bone density were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Rheumatological diseases, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, tendon and nerve lacerations of hand and fore- arm, fractures of upper extremity and hemiplegy, that can causes local osteoporosis in the hand, measurement of hand BMD can be done by DXA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study we purposed to determine stan- dard values of hand Bone Mineral Density (BMD) accord- ing to ages by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in males who applied to our hospital, evaluate association of hand BMD with lumbar and femur BMD and search usefulness of hand BMD measurement by DXA. Methods: Totally, 239 male included, whose ages dif- fer between 27 to 87 years, had no disease associated with bone density were included. The cases, between the ages 20 to 70 separated to age groups, comprised of 5 years. Cases, whose age is 70 and older, included in the same group. Average of dominant and nondominant hand BMD values of the chosen cases were computed according to age groups comprised of 5 years and the association with values of L2-L4 and femur neck BMD is searched separately. Results: There is significant association between domi- nant hand BMD scores with L2-L4 and femur neck BMD scores. Also there is significant association between non- dominant hand BMD scores with L2-L4 and femur neck BMD scores. Also there is asignificant association be- tween scores of hand BMD with hand grip strenght. Conclusion: In this study there is significant associa- tion between BMD scores of dominant and nondominant hand with BMD scores of L2-L4 and femur neck in all age groups. Rheumatological diseases, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, tendon and nerve lacerations of hand and fore- arm, fractures of upper extremity and hemiplegy, that can causes local osteoporosis in the hand, measurement of hand BMD can be done by DXA.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada hastanemize başvuran erkeklerde, dual enerji x-ışını absorpsiyometri (DXA) ile yapılan el kemik mineral yoğunluğunun (KMY) yaşlara göre stan- dart değerlerini saptamayı, lomber ve kalça KMY’si ve el kavrama gücü ile ilişkisini değerlendirmeyi ve DXA ile yapılan el KMY ölçümünün kullanılabilirliğini araştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: Kemik yoğunluğu ile ilgili doğrudan veya do- laylı hastalığı olmayan, yaşları 20 ila 87 arasında değişen toplam 239 erkek alındı. 20 ve 70 yaş arası olgular 5’erli yaş gruplarına ayrıldı. 70 yaş ve üzeri olgular aynı gruba dahil edildi. Çalışmamıza seçilen olguların yaşlara göre dominant el ve nondominant el kemik mineral yoğunlu- ğu ortalamaları ile L2-L4 ve femur boyun KMY arasındaki ilişki ayrı ayrı incelendi. Bulgular: Dominant el KMY skorları ile L2-L4 ve fe- mur boynu KMY skorları arasında anlamlı ilişki bulundu (p<0,01). Nondominant el KMY skoru ile L2-L4 ve fe- mur boynu KMY skorları arasında anlamlı ilişki bulundu (p<0,01). El KMY skorları ile el kavrama gücü skorları ara- sında da anlamlı ilişki bulundu (p<0,05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmada, dominant ve nondominant el KMY skoru ile L2-L4 ve femur boynu KMY skorları arasında, tüm yaş gruplarında anlamlı ilişki bulundu. Romatolojik hastalıklar, refleks sempatik distrofi, el ve ön-koldaki ten- don ve sinir kesileri, üst ekstremite kırıkları ve hemipleji gibi elde lokalize osteoporoza sebep olabilecek durumlar- da el DXA ile ölçüm yapılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZTÜRK, Ş., TEMİZTÜRK, F., KURAN, K. B. (2013). Determination of the standard values of the hand bone mineral density values in males according to ages. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 220–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/349725

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Kanis JA. The restoration of skeletal mass: a theoretic over view. Am J Med 1991;91:107-110
  2. Ellerington MC, Hillard TC, Whitcroft SI et al. Intranasal salmon calcitonin for the prevention and treatment of post menopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;59:6-11
  3. Kanis JA, Jonell O, Oden A, et al. Epidemiology of osteopo rosis and fracture in men. Calcif Tissue Int 2004;75:90-99
  4. Kutsal YK. Osteoporoz. In: Beyazova M, Kutsal YK(ed). Fi ziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevi Ltd. Şti; 2011.p:2633-59
  5. Kanis JA, Gluer CC, Fort HE. Committee of scientific advi sors. International osteoporosis foundation an up date on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densi tometry. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:192-202
  6. Arya SN. Osteoporosis. JIACM 2000;5:169-178
  7. Gür A, Sarac AJ, Nas K, Cevik R. The relationship between tooth loss and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Romatol Tıb Rehab 2001;12:7-11
  8. Ito M, Hayashi K, Yamada M, Nakamura T. Vertebral mea surements for assessment of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 1994;67:759-763
  9. Hernandez ER, Revilla M, Seco-Durban C, et al. Heteroge neity of trabecular and cortical postmenopausal bone loss: a longitudinal study with pQCT. Bone 1997;20:283-287
  10. Gatti D, Rossini M, Zamberlan N, et al. Effect of aging on trabecular and compact bone components of proximal and ultradistal radius. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:355-360
  11. Yücesoy G. Postmenopozal osteoporoz tedavisinde hormon replasman tedavisi ve selektif östrojen reseptör modülatör leri. Osteoporoz Dünyasından 2000;7:135-139
  12. Riggs BL, Melton LJ. The prevention and treatment of os teoporosis. N Engl J Med 1992;327:620-627
  13. Rosen CJ, Tenenhause A. Biochemical markers of bone turnover. A look at laboratory tests that reflect bone status. Postgrad Med 1998 Oct;104:101-102
  14. Manisalı M, Ozaksoy D, Yılmaz E, et al. Bone mineral den sty referance values in the normal female and male popula tion of İzmir, Turkey. Eur Radiol 2003;13:162-167
  15. Szulc P, Munoz F, Duboeuf F, et al. Bone mineral density predicts osteoporotic fractures in elderly men: the MİNOS study. Osteoporosis Int 2005;16:1184-1119
  16. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al. Noninvasive assess ment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:707-730
  17. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, et al. Broadband ultra sound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and inde pendently of densitometry in older women. A prospective