Journals / Çocuk Acil ve Yoğun Bakım Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Presence of Family Members During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Nursing Students Opinions

Çocuğunun Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyonuna Aile Üyelerinin Tanıklığı: Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Düşünceleri

Pages
122–127
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The students’ grade, gender, resuscitation knowledge and previous involvement in the resuscitation process have affected their views about the presence of family members for witnessing their children’s resuscitation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the opinions of nursing students about the presence of family members during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study was conducted with 487 students who were studying in the nursing department of the Faculty of Health Sciences, in 2017-2018 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The students’ grade, gender, resuscitation knowledge and previous involvement in the resuscitation process have affected their views about the presence of family members for witnessing their children’s resuscitation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the opinions of nursing students about the presence of family members during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods: This study was conducted with 487 students who were studying in the nursing department of the Faculty of Health Sciences, in 2017-2018 academic year. Data were collected using ‘‘questionnaire form’’ which was developed to determine students’ opinions about the presence of family members during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Data were analyzed by using the descriptive statistics and chi-square test. Results: The average age of students was 19.84±1.85 years, 87.7% of them were girls and 40.9% were first grade students. 15% of the students previously joined resuscitation process, 18.9% of them only observed this process. 86.9% of the students did not have information regarding the family’ witness of resuscitation, 61.4% of them stated that family should not join this process, 55.6% of them said that the presence of family would be a problem during the resuscitation. 91.4% of the students stated that family should not join the process because of presenting emotional reactions, 63.7% of the students stated that if their relative were resuscitated, they would want to join the resuscitation. Students who were female and who previously joined resuscitation process did not want the family members to be present in the process (p<0.05). Students who were at first class wanted the presence of family members during resuscitation more (p=0.002). Conclusion: The students’ grade, gender, resuscitation knowledge and previous involvement in the resuscitation process have affected their views about the presence of family members for witnessing their children’s resuscitation.

Özet

Giriş: Bu tanımlayıcı çalışma, hemşirelik öğrencilerinin çocuğunun kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyonuna aile üyelerinin tanıklığı hakkındaki düşüncelerini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Yöntemler: Araştırmanın evrenini 2017-2018 öğretim yılında bir Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Bölümü’nde öğrenim gören 487 öğrenci oluşturdu. Araştırmanın verileri, öğrencilerin çocuğunun resüsitasyonuna aile üyelerinin tanıklığı hakkındaki düşüncelerini belirlemek amacıyla geliştirilen “anket formu” ile toplandı. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve ki-kare testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin yaş ortalaması 19,84±1,85 yıl, %87,7’si kız, %40,9’u birinci sınıfta idi. Öğrencilerin %15’i daha önce resüsitasyon işlemine katılmış, %18,9’u ise resüsitasyon işlemini sadece izlemişti. Öğrencilerin %86,9’unun resüsitasyona ailenin tanıklığı ile ilgili bilgisi yoktu, %61,4’ü işlem sırasında ailenin bulunmaması gerektiğini, %55,6’sı işlem sırasında ailenin bulunmasının sıkıntı yaratacağını belirtti. Öğrencilerin %91,4’ü duygusal tepki verme riskinden dolayı işlem sırasında ailenin bulunmaması gerektiğini, %63,7’si ise kendi aile bireylerinden biri resüsite ediliyorsa yanında olmak istediğini ifade etti. Daha önce resüsistasyon işlemine katılan öğrenciler ve kız öğrenciler, ailelerin işleme tanıklık etmesini istemiyordu (p<0,05). Birinci sınıf öğrencileri, çocuğunun resüsitasyon işlemi sırasında ailesinin bulunmasını daha fazla istedi (p=0,002). Sonuç: Öğrencilerin sınıfı, cinsiyeti, resüsitasyonu bilme durumları ve resüsitasyon işlemine daha önce katılma durumları, aile üyelerinin çocuklarının resüsitasyonuna tanıklıkları hakkındaki görüşlerini etkiledi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAASLAN, E., KOSTAK, M. A., SEMERCİ, R., ÇETİNBAŞ, İ. (2020). Presence of Family Members During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Nursing Students Opinions. Çocuk Acil ve Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 122–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/348738

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Lai MK, Aritejo BA, Tang JS, Chen CL, Chuang CC. Predicting medical professionals’ intention to allow family presence during resuscitation: A cross sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;70:11- 6
  2. Doyle CJ, Post H, Burney RE, Maino J, Keefe M, et al. Family participation during resuscitation: an option. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:673-5
  3. Düzkaya DS, Köşkeroğlu EM, Bozkurt G. The opinions of healthcare professionals working in pediatric clinics on witnessing resuscitation. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Derg. 2012;16:8-13
  4. American Association of Critical Care Nurses. Practice alert: Family presence during resuscitation and invasive procedures. AACN. 2016;36:e11-4
  5. American Heart Association. Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: part 2. Ethical aspect of CPR and ECC. Circulation. 2000;102(suppl.1):112-21
  6. Harrison TM. Family-centered pediatric nursing care: state of the science. J Pediatr Nurs. 2010;25:335-43
  7. Al-Mutair AS, Plummer V, Copnell B. Family presence during resuscitation: a descriptive study of nurses’ attitudes from two Saudi hospitals. Nurs Crit Care. 2012;17:90-8
  8. Porter JE, Cooper SJ, Sellick K. Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR): perceived benefits, barriers and enablers to implementation and practice. Int Emerg Nurs. 2014;22:69-74
  9. Weslien M, Nilstun T, Lundqvist A, Fridlund B. Narratives aboutresuscitation--family members differ about presence. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;5:68-74
  10. Boyd R. Witnessed resusciation by relatives. Resusciation. 2000;43:171-6
  11. Mangurten JA, Scott SH, Guzzetta CE, AP, Vinson L. Family presence: Making room. Am J Nurs. 2005;105:40-8
  12. O’Connell K, Fritzeen J, Guzzetta C, Clark AP, Lloyd C. Family presence during trauma resuscitation: Family members’ attitudes, behaviors, and experiences. Am J Crit Care. 2017;26:229-39
  13. Dougal RL, Anderson JH, Reavy K, Shirazi CC. Family presence during resuscitation and/or invasive procedures in the emergency department: one size does not fit all. J Emerg Nurs. 2011;37:152-7
  14. Mian P, Warchal S, Whitney S, Fitzmaurice J, Tancredi D. Impact of a multifaceted intervention on nurses’ and physicians’ attitudes and behaviors toward family presence during resuscitation. Crit Care Nurse. 2007;27:52-61
  15. Sak-Dankosky N, Andruszkiewicz P, Sherwood PR, Kvist T. Integrative review: nurses’ and physicians’ experiences and attitudes towards inpatient-witnessed resuscitation of an adult patient. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:957-74
  16. Lederman