Journals / Toplum ve Hekim / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

History of Anti-Vaccination

AŞI KARŞITLIĞININ TARİHÇESİ

Pages
187–194
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The question of how to take action against anti-vaccine arguments and movements continues to seek answers in creative tension between persuasion and force.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The history of the anti-vaccine movement is as old as the vaccine itself.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The anti-vaccine movement in the 19th century, which was raised as part of the struggle of working class against the pressure and the force, was more focused on the individual freedoms rather than the vaccine itself.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The question of how to take action against anti-vaccine arguments and movements continues to seek answers in creative tension between persuasion and force.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The history of the anti-vaccine movement is as old as the vaccine itself. Groups against vaccination due to reasons such as spirituality, scientific wisdom, conspiracy theories have always existed since the presence of vaccine. However, the infl uence of these groups became weaker. The anti-vaccine movement in the 19th century, which was raised as part of the struggle of working class against the pressure and the force, was more focused on the individual freedoms rather than the vaccine itself. In 20th and 21st centuries, where the vaccine-preventable diseases can not be observed or rarely seen thanks to successes achieved with vaccination, vaccine controversy existed in a context focused on the risks that arise from the vaccine itself. The most important lesson that the historical context taught us in this article is the concerns about vaccination must be taken seriously. The question of how to take action against anti-vaccine arguments and movements continues to seek answers in creative tension between persuasion and force.

Özet

Aşı karşıtı hareketin tarihi aşının kendisi kadar eskidir. Maneviyat, bilimsel bilgiye güvenmeme, komplo teorileri gibi gerekçelerle aşıya karşı olan gruplar aşının varlığından bu yana hep varolmuştur. Ancak bu grupların etkisi daha zayıf olmuştur. 19. yy’da işçi sınıfının baskı ve zora karşı mücadelesinin bir parçası olarak yükselmiş olan aşı karşıtı hareket, aşının kendisinden çok bireysel özgürlükler çerçevesine odaklanmıştır. 20 ve 21. yy’larda aşı karşıtlığı, aşılamayla elde edilen başarılar sayesinde aşıyla korunabilen hastalıkların görülmediği veya nadir görüldüğü bir ortamda, aşının kendisinden kaynaklanan risklere odaklı bir çerçevede varolmuştur. Bu yazıda ele alınan tarihsel bağlamın bize öğrettiği en önemli ders aşılama ile ilgili endişelerin ciddiye alınması gerektiğidir. Aşı karşıtı tartışmalara ve hareketlere karşı nasıl tutum alınması gerektiği sorusu, ikna ve zor gücü arasındaki yaratıcı gerilimde yanıt aramaya devam etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVUZ, M. (2018). History of Anti-Vaccination. Toplum ve Hekim, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 187–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/348210

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Albert, M.R., Ostheimer, K.G., Breman, J.G. (2001) Th e last smallpox epidemic in Boston and the vaccination controversy, 19011903. New England Journal of Medicine 344 (5): 375-379.
  2. Baker, J.P. (2003) Th e pertussis vaccine controversy in Great Britain, 1974–1986. Vaccine 21 (25-26): 4003-4010.
  3. BBC News (2004) Lead researcher defends MMR study. Erişim tarihi 25 Nisan 2018 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3510721.stm
  4. Black, C., Kaye, J.A., Jick, H. (2002) Relation of childhood gastrointestinal disorders to autism: nested case control study using data from the UK General Practice Research Database. BMJ, 325:419421. Chen, R.T., DeStefano F. (1998) Vaccine adverse events: causal or coincidental? Th e Lancet, Vol. 351: 611-612.
  5. Deer, B. (2011a) How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed. BMJ, 342:c5347. Deer B. (2011b) How the vaccine was meant to make money. BMJ, 342:c5258. Durbach, N. (2000) ‘Th ey Might As Well Brand Us’: Working-Class Resistance to Compulsory Vaccination in Victorian England. Th e Society for the Social History of Medicine 13: 45-62.
  6. Engels, F. (1997) İngiltere’de Emekçi Sınıfın Durumu (1. Baskı) Çev: Fincancı,Y. Ankara:
  7. Sol Yayınları.
  8. Fine, P.E.M., Clarkson, J.A. (1986) Individual versus public priorities in the determination of optimal vaccinatıon policies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 124 (6): 1012-1020.
  9. Gangarosa, E.J., Galazka, A.M., Wolfe, C.R., Phillips, L. M., Gangarosa, R. E., Miller, E., Chen, R.T. (1998) Impact of antivaccine movements on pertussis control: Th e untold story. Th e Lancet, 351:356-361.
  10. Godlee, F., Smith, J., Marcovitch, H. (2011) Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ, 342:c7452. Gostin, O.L. (2005) Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 Years: Police Power and Civil Liberties in Tension. American Journal of Public Health 95(4): 576-581.
  11. History of Vaccines web sitesi (2018) History of anti-vaccination movement Erişim tarihi 6 Mart 2018 https://www.historyofvaccines. org/content/articles/history-anti-vaccination-movements#Source 8 Honda, H., Shimizu, Y., Rutter, M. (2005) No eff ect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46: 572-579.
  12. Kulenkampff, M., Schwartzman, J.S., Wilson, J. (1974) Neurological complications of pertussis inoculation. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 49: 46-49.
  13. Lancet (1904) Th e Spread of Small-pox by Tramps. Th e Lancet, 163: 446-447.
  14. Madsen, K.M., Hviid, A., Vestergaard, M., Sch