Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

The development of theory of mind according to false belief performance of children ages 3 to 5

Zihin kuramının 3-5 yaşları arasındaki çocuklarda gelişiminin yanlış İnanç performansına göre incelenmesi

Pages
1809–1826
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was clear that the rapid change of understanding false belief seemed to have appeared at 4.6 year old.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has examined the role of age in the false belief understanding in typically developing children and to determine if the different type of false belief tasks affects performance on false belief.
📊
Key Findings & Data:False belief understanding was measured in 72 children between the ages of 3.00 to 5.11 year old.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was clear that the rapid change of understanding false belief seemed to have appeared at 4.6 year old.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study has examined the role of age in the false belief understanding in typically developing children and to determine if the different type of false belief tasks affects performance on false belief. The survey research design was used. False belief understanding was measured in 72 children between the ages of 3.00 to 5.11 year old. The sample consisted of 12 children in each age group and age groups were divided into six month period. Four false belief tasks were conducted. The findings of this study indicated that the false belief understanding of Turkish speaking children between the ages of 3.0 to 5.11 year old had some similarities as well as some differences to children speaking other than Turkish. 3 year old children seemed to have developed an understanding of the own false belief before they developed a clear understanding of others’ false belief. It was clear that the rapid change of understanding false belief seemed to have appeared at 4.6 year old.

Özet

Normal gelişim gösteren çocukların zihin kuramı işlemlerindeki performanslarının yaşlara göre belirlenmesi ve kullanılan yanlış inanç işlemlerine göre çocukların performanslarında fark olup olmadığının incelenmesinin amaçlandığı araştırma, tarama araştırmaların bir türü olan kesitsel araştırma deseni kullanılarak yapılandırılmıştır. Çalışma grubuna 3.00 – 5.11 yaşlar arasında toplam 72 çocuk alınmıştır. 6 aylık dilimlerden oluşan altı yaş grubunun her birine 12 çocuk dâhil edilmiştir. Zihin kuramının değerlendirilmesinde 4 yanlış inanç işlemi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, 3-5 yaşlar arasındaki anadili Türkçe olan çocuklarda zihin kuramının yaşlara göre gelişiminin diğer dillerle benzerliklerinin yanı sıra farklılıklarının da olduğunu göstermektedir. Çocukların kendi yanlış inançlarını anlamada 3 yaşında başarılı oldukları, başkasının yanlış inançlarını anlamada ise 3 yaşın ikinci ve 4 yaşın ilk döneminde bir değişimin yaşandığı, ancak kazanımın 4.6 yaşta olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYSILI, B. K., ACARLAR, İ. F. (2011). The development of theory of mind according to false belief performance of children ages 3 to 5. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 1809–1826. https://ajindex.com/articles/347437

References (13)

  1. Aksu-Koç, A., Aydın, Ç., Avcı, G., Sefer, N., & Yaşa, Y. (2005, July). The relation between mental verbs and theory of mind performance: Evidence from Turkish children. Paper presented at International Association for the Study of Child Language (IASCL), Berlin. Astington, J., & Jenkins, J. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relationship between language and theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1311-1320.
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (2nd ed., pp. 3-20). New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
  4. Bartsch, K., & Estes, D. (1996). Individual differences in children’s developing theory of mind and implications for metacognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 281-304.
  5. Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Bayramoğlu, M., & Hohenberger, A. (2007, August). The development of theory of mind in Turkish preschoolers: Poster presented at 13th European Conference on Developmental Psychology (ECPD), Jena Germany. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. de Villiers, J., & Pyers, J. E. (2002) Complements to cognition: A longitidunal study of the relationship between complement syntax and false belief understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 1037-1060.
  8. Dennett, D. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. The Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 4, 568-570.
  9. Flavell, J. H. (1999). Development of intuitions about the controllability of different mental states. Cognitive Development, 14, 133-146.
  10. Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence fort he Level 1- Level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology, 17, 99-103.
  11. Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance-reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95-120.
  12. Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., Green, F. L., & Moses, L. J. (1990). Young children’s understanding of fact beliefs versus value beliefs. Child Development, 61, 915-928.
  13. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1995). Young children’s knowledge of thinking. Monographs of the Society for