Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Teacher perceptions of school-based evaluation: A descriptive analysis based on teachers’ wives

Okul temelli değerlendirme algısı: Öğretmen görüşlerine dayalı betimsel bir analiz çalışması

Pages
2105–2124
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, their expectations are followed by expressions of condition and worry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is about transformation that has been happening in the field of management and in relation to it in inspection that has been recently taking place both in Turkey and all around the World.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was designed as qualitative and a semi-structured interview was made with 35 teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, their expectations are followed by expressions of condition and worry.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is about transformation that has been happening in the field of management and in relation to it in inspection that has been recently taking place both in Turkey and all around the World. The transformation as “School Based Administration” (SBA) in educational administration and “School Based Evaluation” (SBE) or “Self-evaluation” in inspection refers to the transformation of the concepts, expressions, goals, indicators and processes about education, administration and inspection. The research was designed as qualitative and a semi-structured interview was made with 35 teachers. Statements of teachers were classified and interpreted in three themes. The most significant point from the interviews is that teachers criticize classical inspection methods and think that SBE has also similar limitations. Teachers do not rely on the inspectors though they find inspection necessary. They have doubts that they will have similar experiences of inspection done in the past with SBE. They consider inspection as functional and state that they are hopeful with SBE though their expectations have not been met so far. However, their expectations are followed by expressions of condition and worry.

Özet

Bu çalışma son yıllarda dünyada ve Türkiyede yönetim ve bununla bağlantılı olarak denetim alanında yaşanmakta olan dönüşümle ilgilidir. Eğitim yönetimi alanında “Okul Temelli Yönetim” (OTY), denetim alanında ‘Okul Temelli Değerlendirme (OTD) (School-based evaluation) veya ‘Özdeğerlendirme olarak ifade edilen dönüşümle, eğitime, yönetime ve denetime ilişkin kavramların, söylemlerin, hedeflerin, göstergelerin ve işleyişin dönüşümü söz konusudur. Nitel araştırma modeline uygun desenlenen bu araştırmada veriler 35 öğretmenden, yarı yapılandırılmış bir görüşme formu yardımıyla toplanmıştır. Veriler, önceden belirlenmiş olan; denetim olgusuna, OTDye ve ideal eğitim denetimine ilişkin öğretmen algıları olmak üzere üç ana temaya uygun olarak betimsel analiz yoluyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada, öğretmenlerin klasik denetim uygulamalarını eleştirmeleri ve OTDnin de benzer sınırlıklar taşıdığını düşünmeleri en dikkate değer bulgudur. Öğretmenler denetimin gerekliliğini düşünseler de uygulayıcılara güvenmemektedirler. Geçmişteki denetim deneyimlerinin benzerini OTD ile yeniden yaşanacağından endişe etmektedirler. Öğretmenler, denetimi işlevsel bir araç olarak gördüklerini, ancak bugüne kadar bu beklentinin karşılanmamasına karşın OTD ile umutlandıklarını dile getirmişlerdir. Ancak umut ifadelerini koşul ve endişe ifadeleri izlemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜLBÜL, T., ÖZDEM, G., TUNÇ, B., İNANDI, Y. (2013). Teacher perceptions of school-based evaluation: A descriptive analysis based on teachers’ wives. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 2105–2124. https://ajindex.com/articles/347022

References (17)

  1. Altun, S. A. ve Memişoğlu, S. (2008). İlköğretim okullarında çoklu veri kaynağına dayalı performans değerlendirmesine ilişkin nitel bir çalışma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 14(54), 151-179.
  2. Aydın, İ. (2005). Öğretimde denetim: Durum saptama değerlendirme ve geliştirme. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Aytaç, T. (1999). Okul merkezli yönetim. Eğitim ve Bilim, 23(111), 69-75.
  4. Ball, S. J. (1993). Education policy, power relations and teachers’ work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 106-121.
  5. Ball, S. J. (1997). Good school/bad school: paradox and fabrication. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(3), 317-336.
  6. Berliner, D. C., & Nichols, S. L. (2007). High-stakes testing is putting the nation at risk. Retrieved from http://www. joanwink.com/research/Berliner-Nichols-High-Stakes- Testing.pdf. Blok, H., Sleegers, P., & Karsten, S. (2008). Looking for a balance between internal and external evaluation of school quality: Evaluation of the SVI model. Journal of Education Policy, 23(4), 379-395.
  7. Brimblecombe, N., & Ormston, M. (1995). Teachers’ perceptions of school inspection: A stressful experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(1), 53-62.
  8. Brown, B. R., & Cooper, G. R. (2000). School-based management: How effective is it? NASSP Bulletin, Retrieved from http://bul.sagepub.com/content/84/616/77
  9. Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2009). The happiness of teaching (as eudemonia): Disciplinary knowledge and the threat of performativity. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15(2), 241-256.
  10. Burton, W. H. (1930). Supervision. The American Journal of Nursing, 30(8), 1045-1052.
  11. Bushnell, M. (2003). Teachers in the schoolhouse panopticon: Complicity and resistance. Education and Urban Society, 35, 251-272.
  12. Chapman, C. (2000). Improvement, inspection and self- review. Improving Schools, 3, 57-63.
  13. Freire, P. (2010). Ezilenlerin pedagojisi (çev. E. Özbek ve D. Hattatoğlu). İstanbul:
  14. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  15. Gallagher, M. (2010). Are schools panoptic? Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 262-272.
  16. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research competencies for analysis and applications. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Gewirtz, S. (2000). Bringing the politics back in: A critical analysis of quality discourses in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(4), 352-370.
  17. Gewirtz, S., & Ball, S. (2000). From ‘welfarism’ to ‘new managerialism’: Shifting discourses of school headship in the education marketplace. Discourse: Studies