SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2005 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

The Value Congruence Levels of Principals and Teachers At Primary School

İlköğretim Okullarında Görevli Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin Değer Uyum Düzeyleri

MESUT SAĞNAK
Pages
207–228
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, congruence was found between personal values and the perceptions related to organizational values among the principals and teachers in relation to value dimensions of creativity, adaptability, cautiousness, social equality, autonomy, courtesy, humor, logic, aggressiveness, initiative, development, diligence, orderliness, consideration, experimentation, forgiveness, moral integrity, fairness, openness, and broad-mindedness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of congruence between the personal values and the perceptions related to the organizational values of principals and teachers working at primary schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of this descriptive research consisted of the principals and teachers working at central primary schools in Erzincan, in the 2002-2003 academic year, 66 principals/assistant principals and 541 teachers were working at central primary schools in Erzincan.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, congruence was found between personal values and the perceptions related to organizational values among the principals and teachers in relation to value dimensions of creativity, adaptability, cautiousness, social equality, autonomy, courtesy, humor, logic, aggressiveness, initiative, development, diligence, orderliness, consideration, experimentation, forgiveness, moral integrity, fairness, openness, and broad-mindedness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002-2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of congruence between the personal values and the perceptions related to the organizational values of principals and teachers working at primary schools. The population of this descriptive research consisted of the principals and teachers working at central primary schools in Erzincan, in the 2002-2003 academic year, 66 principals/assistant principals and 541 teachers were working at central primary schools in Erzincan. The sample wasn't taken because the research conducted on study population. In the research, 24 value dimensions (McDonald & Gandz, 1991) were used. The data were analyzed by using Spcarman correlation method. According to the results of the study, congruence was found between personal values and the perceptions related to organizational values among the principals and teachers in relation to value dimensions of creativity, adaptability, cautiousness, social equality, autonomy, courtesy, humor, logic, aggressiveness, initiative, development, diligence, orderliness, consideration, experimentation, forgiveness, moral integrity, fairness, openness, and broad-mindedness. Incongruence was found between personal values and the perceptions related to organizational values among the principals in relation to value dimensions of cooperation and economy. Incongruence was found between personal values and the perceptions related to organizational values among the teachers in relation to value dimensions of formality and obedience.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim okullarında görevli yönetici ye öğretmenlerin örgütsel değerlere ilişkin algıları ile kişisel değerleri arasındaki uyum düzeylerini belirlemektir. Betimsel nitelik taşıyan araştırmanın evrenini, Erzincan ili merkez ilköğretim okullarında görevli yönetici ve öğretmenler oluşturmuştur. 2002-2003 eğitim-öğretim yılında Erzincan merkez ilköğretim okullarında 66 müdür ve müdür yardımcısı ile 541 öğretmen görev yapmıştır. Araştırma, çalışma evreni üzerinde yapıldığından örneklem alma yoluna gidilmemiştir. McDonald ve Gandz'ın geliştirmiş oldukları 24 değer boyutunun kullanıldığı araştırmada, öncelik sırasına koyma yöntemi sonucu elde edilen veriler, Spearman sıra farkları korelasyon yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Yönetici ye öğretmenlerin örgütsel değerlere ilişkin algıları ile kişisel değerleri arasında; açık görüşlülük, açıklık, adil olmak, ahlakî tutarlılık, bağışlayıcı olmak, denemeye açıklık, düşüncelilik, düzenlilik, gayret, gelişme, girişim, hırslılık, mantık, neşe, nezaket, otonomi, sosyal eşitlik, tedbirlilik, uyum sağlamak ve yaratıcılık değer boyutlarına ilişkin uyum bulunmuştur. Yöneticilerin örgütsel değerlere ilişkin algıları ile kişisel değerleri arasında ekonomi ve işbirliği değer boyutlarına ilişkin; öğretmenlerin formallik ve itaat değer boyutlarına ilişkin uyumsuzluk tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞNAK, M. (2005). The Value Congruence Levels of Principals and Teachers At Primary School. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 207–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/346475

References (15)

  1. Balazs, A. L. (1990). Value congruence. The case of the^socially rcsponsible firm. - Journal of Business Research, 20, 171-181.
  2. Balcı, A. (2000). Örgütsel sosyalleşme. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Yayıncılık. Begley, P. T. (1999). Value peferences, ethics, and conflicts in school administra-tion in T. B. Paul (Ed.), Values and educational leadership (pp. 237-254). New York: State University of New York Press.
  4. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1994J. Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Yayıncılık. Cable, D. M., & Judgc, T. A. (19%). Person-organization fit, job choicc decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67,294-311.
  6. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 546-561.
  7. Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333-349.
  8. Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socializa-tion in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
  9. Dose, J. J. (1997). Work values: An integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 219-240.
  10. Erdem, F. (1996). İşletme kültürü. Ankara: Friedrich-Naumann-Vakfı ve Akdeniz Üniversitesi iktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi. Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education andsociety. New York: The Free Press.
  11. Feather, N. T. (1979). Human values and the work situation: Two studies. Australian Psychologist, 14, 131-141.
  12. Finegan, J. E. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organiza¬tional commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 149-169.
  13. Hofstede, G. (1984). Cuimre's consequences. international dijferences in ivork-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage. Ivancevich, ]. M., & Matteson, M. T. (1996). Organizational behavior and manage-ment. Chicago: McGraw-Hill. İmamoğlu, E. O. & Aygün, K. Z. (1999). 1970'lerden 1990'lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen, zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farkliliklari. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14, 1-22.
  14. Judge, T. A. & Bretz, R. D. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 261-271.
  15. Kalliath, T. ]., Bluedorn, A. C, & Strube, M. J. (1999). A test of value congruence effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1175-1198.