SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The prediction of gender and attachment styles on shame, guilt, and loneliness

Cinsiyet ve bağlanma stillerinin utanç, suçluluk ve yalnızlık duygularını yordama gücünün araştırılması

MÜGE AKBAĞ
Seval İMAMOĞLU ERDEN
Pages
651–682
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, all attachment styles played a determining role on loneliness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the predictive power of attachment styles and gender on negative social emotions such as shame, guilt, and loneliness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample consists of 360 (183 female, 177 male) students attending to diff erent departments of Marmara University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, all attachment styles played a determining role on loneliness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:cinsiyet · sex

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the predictive power of attachment styles and gender on negative social emotions such as shame, guilt, and loneliness. The sample consists of 360 (183 female, 177 male) students attending to diff erent departments of Marmara University. The Relationships Questionnaire, Guilt-Shame Scale, and UCLA Loneliness Scale were used as instruments. Results obtained from hierarchical regression analysis showed that gender has a predictive power on shame, solely. When the predictivity of attachment styles on negative social emotions was examined, the results revealed that shame was predicted by secure and dismissing attachment style, whereas guilt was predicted by only dismissing attachment. Furthermore, all attachment styles played a determining role on loneliness.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, cinsiyet ve bağlanma stillerinin utanç, suçluluk ve yalnızlık duyguları üzerindeki yordayıcı gücünü sınamaktır. Araştırmaya Marmara Üniversitesi’nin farklı bölümlerinde öğrenim gören 360 (183 kız, 177 erkek) üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak İlişkiler Anketi, Suçluluk-Utanç Ölçeği ve UCLA Yalnızlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Yapılan hiyerarşik regresyon analizleri sonucunda, cinsiyet değişkeninin tek başına sadece utanç duygusunu yordadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bağlanma stillerinin yordayıcılığı incelendiğinde, utanç duygusunun güvenli ve kayıtsız bağlanma ile yordandığı; buna karşın suçluluk duygusu üzerinde sadece kayıtsız bağlanmanın yordayıcı gücünün olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca bulgular tüm bağlanma stillerinin yalnızlık duygusunun oluşmasında belirleyici rol oynadığını göstermektedir.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

AKBAĞ, M., ERDEN, S. İ. (2010). The prediction of gender and attachment styles on shame, guilt, and loneliness. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 651–682. https://ajindex.com/articles/346378

References (12)

  1. Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978).
  2. Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226- 244. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497- 529. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
  3. Baumrind, D. (1979). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth and Society, 9, 239-276.
  4. Blain, M. D., Th ompson, J. M., & Whiff en, V. E. (1993). Attachment and perceived social support in late adolescence: The interaction between working models of self and others. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 226-241.
  5. Borys, S. & Perlman, D. (1985). Gender diff erences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 63-74.
  6. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of aff ectional bonds: Etiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201-210.
  7. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. Volume III: Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books. Bradshaw, J. (1988). Healing the shame that binds you. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications. Burger, J. M. (2006). Kişilik (çev. D. İ. Erguvan-Sarıoğlu,). İstanbul:
  8. Kaknüs Yayınları.
  9. Cassidy, J. & Berlin, L. J. (1994). The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child Development, 65, 971-991.
  10. Collins, N. L. & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663.
  11. Consedine, N. S. & Magai, C. (2003). Attachment and emotion experience in later life: The view from emotions theory. Attachment and Human Development, 5(2), 165- 187. Çelik, Ş. (2004). The effects of an attachment oriented psychoeducational group training on improving the preoccupied attachment styles of university students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  12. Demir, A. (1990). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yalnızlık düzeylerini etkileyen bazı etmenler [The factors aff ecting the loneliness level of university students]. Yayımlanmamış doktora