Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

A Study on the Spatial Abilities of Prospective Social Studies Teachers: A Mixed Method Research*

Pages
965–986
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study results showed that spatial visualization and mental rotation abilities of the prospective teachers were low; male prospective teachers were betterqualified than female ones in mental rotation but spatial visualization ability did not vary by gender.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated prospective social studies teachers' spatial abilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was conducted with 234 prospective teachers attending Social Studies Teaching departments at Education Faculties of two universities in Central and Southern Anatolia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study results showed that spatial visualization and mental rotation abilities of the prospective teachers were low; male prospective teachers were betterqualified than female ones in mental rotation but spatial visualization ability did not vary by gender.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigated prospective social studies teachers' spatial abilities. It was conducted with 234 prospective teachers attending Social Studies Teaching departments at Education Faculties of two universities in Central and Southern Anatolia. This study, designed according to the explanatory-sequential design, is a mixed research method, involving two stages. The first stage was conducted in the causal-comparative research design. The data were collected using "Mental Rotation Test" and "Surface Development Test". Descriptive statistics, MANOVA and ANOVA were used to analyze the data. The second stage was designed as a case study. "Opinion Form for Spatial Ability Tests" was used to elicit the views of 37 prospective teachers (F:20, M:17) identified via the purposive sampling method. The qualitative data obtained were analyzed using the content analysis technique. The study results showed that spatial visualization and mental rotation abilities of the prospective teachers were low; male prospective teachers were betterqualified than female ones in mental rotation but spatial visualization ability did not vary by gender. Moreover, prospective teachers with higher academic averages had better spatial abilities. Integrating virtual environment applications such as Google Earth etc. into social studies courses and using them in these courses can help to improve prospective teachers' spatial abilities

🔖

Cite This Article

YURT, E., TÜNKLER, V. (2016). A Study on the Spatial Abilities of Prospective Social Studies Teachers: A Mixed Method Research*. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 965–986. https://ajindex.com/articles/346061

References (13)

  1. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86-107.
  2. Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for research in mathematics education, 21(4), 47-60.
  3. Battista, M., Wheatley, G., & Talsma, G. (1982). Spatial visualization, formal reasoning, and geometric problem solving strategies of preservice elementary teachers. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 11(4), 17-30.
  4. Bulut, S., & Köroğlu, S. (2000). On birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin ve matematik öğretmen adaylarının uzaysal yeteneklerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of spatial abilities of 11th grade students and mathematics prospective teachers]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(18), 56-61.
  5. Burton, L. A., Henninger, D., & Hafetz, J. (2005). Gender differences in relationsof mental rotation, verbal fluency, and SAT scores to finger length ratios ashormonal indexes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(1), 493-505.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  7. Cantürk-Günhan, B., Turgut, M., & Yılmaz, S. (2009). Spatial ability of a mathematics teacher: The case of Oya. IBSU Scientific Journal, 3(1), 151-158.
  8. Carnoldi, C., & Vecchi, T. (2004). Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  9. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Casey, M. B., Nutall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross national gender based items. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(10), 28-57.
  11. Cheng, Y. L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children's mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2-11.
  12. Clements, D. H., & Michael T. B. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-464).
  13. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ Kayhan, E. B. (2005). Investiga