SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Law and Justice Review / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 10

Kamu Sektöründe Bir Zorunluluk Olarak Performans Değerlendirme Sistemi ve En Son Değişiklikler Doğrultusunda Kanuniliği

PERFORMACE EVALUATION SYSTEM AS AN OBLIGATION IN PUBLIC SECTOR AND ITS LEGALITY TOWARDS RECENT AMENDMENTS

Ahmet TOZLU
M. Tarık ERASLAN
Pages
55–73
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, existing and main legal basis of Turkish public personnel system and performance evaluation system will be shared; also jurally the implementation legality of performance evaluation system will be propounded in company with current amendments and studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Public sector has both similarities and differences with the private sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These critics or “accusations” also were articulated with the belief of having similar processes between public and private sector and so performance based reform studies have accelerated in the public sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, existing and main legal basis of Turkish public personnel system and performance evaluation system will be shared; also jurally the implementation legality of performance evaluation system will be propounded in company with current amendments and studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Public sector has both similarities and differences with the private sector. On the other hand, public sector and its employees have been criticized with inefficiency by citizens, politicians, academicians and other relevant counterparts. These critics or “accusations” also were articulated with the belief of having similar processes between public and private sector and so performance based reform studies have accelerated in the public sector. All these global changes are also valid for the Turkish public administration and personnel system. In this study, the main dinamics of public and private sectors will be explained by outlining similarities and differences and individual performance evaluation system will be touched on as a tool of effectiveness and efficiency. The details of designing and implementation phases of individual performance evaluation system will be included in this context. Finally, existing and main legal basis of Turkish public personnel system and performance evaluation system will be shared; also jurally the implementation legality of performance evaluation system will be propounded in company with current amendments and studies.

Özet

Bir takım farklılıkların yanı sıra kamu sektörü özel sektörle bazı benzerliklere sahiptir. Diğer yandan, kamu sektörü ve çalışanları vatandaşlar, politikacılar, akademisyenler ya da diğer ilgililer tarafından düşük performansla çalışmakla eleştirilmektedir. Bu eleştiri ve “suçlamalar” kamu sektörü ve özel sektörün benzer süreçlere sahip olduğu inancı ile de eklemlenmiş ve kamu sektöründe performans tabanlı reform çalışmaları hızlanmıştır. Tüm bu küresel değişiklikler Türk kamu yönetimi ve personel sistemi için de geçerlidir.Bu çalışmada benzerlikler ve farklılıklar üzerinden kamu sektörü ve özel sektörün ana dinamikleri anlatılacak ve bir etkinlik ve verimlilik aracı olarak bireysel performans değerlendirme sistemine değinilecektir. Bu kapsamda bireysel performans de- ğerlendirme sisteminin kurgulanması ve uygulanması aşamalarındaki ayrıntılara yer verilecektir. Ardından Türk kamu personel sisteminin ve performans değerlendirme sisteminin mevcut ve temel yasal dayanakları paylaşılacak; güncel değişiklik ve çalışmalar eşliğinde performans değerlendirme sisteminin hukuki açıdan da uygulama mesruiyetinin varlığı ortaya konulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOZLU, A., ERASLAN, M. T. (2015). Kamu Sektöründe Bir Zorunluluk Olarak Performans Değerlendirme Sistemi ve En Son Değişiklikler Doğrultusunda Kanuniliği. Law and Justice Review, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 10, 55–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/345234

References (17)

  1. Agere, S. and N. Jorm, Designing Performance Appraisals, London, 2000.
  2. Akçakanat, T., İnsan Kaynakları Yönetiminde Performans Değerlendirme: Isparta İl Emniyet Müdürlüğü’nde Bir Uygulama (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Isparta, 2009. Alford D. and J. O’Flynn, Rethinking Public Service Delivery, Managing with External Providers, Palgrave Macmillan Distribution, England, 2012.
  3. Andrews, R., G.A. Boyne and R. M. Walker, Subjective and Objective Measures of Organizational Performance: An Amprical Exploration Public Service Performance Perspectives on Measurement and Management, Cambridge, 2006.
  4. Atkinson, S. E., and Halversen, R, “The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Regulated Environment: The Case of U.S. Electric Utilities”, Journal of Public Economics. No: 29, p. 281 – 294, 1986.
  5. Ban, C., How Do Public Managers Manage, Josey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1995.
  6. Benn, S. I., and Gaus, G. F., Public and Private in Social Life, St. Martin’ s Press, New York, 1983.
  7. Chubb, J. E., and Moe, T. M., “Politics, Markets, and the Organization of Schools”. American Political Science Review. No: 82, p. 1065–1088, 1988.
  8. Clarke, J., “It’s Not Like Shopping”, Governance, Consumers and Citizens, Edited by Mark Bevir and Frank Trentmann, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2007.
  9. Cole, M. And G. Parston, Unlocking Public Value, A New Model For Achieving High Performance in Public Service Organizations, New Jersey, 2006.
  10. Cornetta, M., Marcus A. and Tehranian, H., “Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management”,Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 87, Issue 2, p. 357-373, 2008.
  11. Dahlström, C., V. Lapuente, “Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 20, p. 577–600, 2009.
  12. De Cenzo, David. A. and S. P. Robbins, Human Resource Management, (5. Edition) John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1996.
  13. Eraslan, T. ve A. Tozlu, Kamu Yönetiminde Performansa Dayalı Ücret Sistemi, Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı 81, ss.33-61, Ankara, 2011.
  14. Frederickson, H. George., “Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement With the New Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No. 3 (May-Jun.), pp. 263-270, Blackwell Publishing, 1996.
  15. Greener, I., Public Management, Second Edition,
  16. Palgrave Macmillan, United Kingdom, 2013.
  17. Hatry, P. H., Performance Measurements, Getting Results, Urban Institute Press, Was