SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Role of laparoscopy procedure in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic acute abdomen: Original article

Murat KANLIÖZ
Uğur EKİCİ
Pages
41–44
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean hospital stay was 2.82±1.64 days in patients with only abdominal traumaand 4.34±2.08 days in those with multiple trauma.Conclusion: Laparoscopy contributes signifiantly to the diagnosis and treatment of selected patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The objective of this study was to analyze the role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic acute abdomen.Materials and Methods: Cases of patients with traumatic acute abdomen from between 2009 and 2017 diagnosed with laparoscopy but not examination, laboratory tests, or radiological methods were reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patient demographic data, causes of acute abdomen, procedures applied, and duration of hospitalization were analyzed.Results: Of the total of 138 patients, the cause of admission was a traffi accident in 46 cases (33.33%), sharp object injury in 27 (19.56%), gunshot injury in 19 (13.76%), falling from a height in 16 (11.59%), workaccident in 14 (10.14%), physical violence in 9 (6.92%), sports injury in 4 (2.89%), and an animal kick in 3 (2.17%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean hospital stay was 2.82±1.64 days in patients with only abdominal traumaand 4.34±2.08 days in those with multiple trauma.Conclusion: Laparoscopy contributes signifiantly to the diagnosis and treatment of selected patients.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The objective of this study was to analyze the role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic acute abdomen.Materials and Methods: Cases of patients with traumatic acute abdomen from between 2009 and 2017 diagnosed with laparoscopy but not examination, laboratory tests, or radiological methods were reviewed. These were patients with unstable vital signs for whom time was critical . The patient demographic data, causes of acute abdomen, procedures applied, and duration of hospitalization were analyzed.Results: Of the total of 138 patients, the cause of admission was a traffi accident in 46 cases (33.33%), sharp object injury in 27 (19.56%), gunshot injury in 19 (13.76%), falling from a height in 16 (11.59%), workaccident in 14 (10.14%), physical violence in 9 (6.92%), sports injury in 4 (2.89%), and an animal kick in 3 (2.17%). In all, 56 (40.58%) were female and 82 (59.42%) were male. The mean age was 27.45±9.81 years.Of the patients, 64 (46.38%) had only abdominal trauma, while 74 (53.62%) had multiple trauma. The procedures performed included 83 (60.14%) diagnostic laparoscopies, 30 (21.74%) laparoscopies with additional laparoscopic procedures, and 25 (18.11%) instances of post-laparoscopy open surgery. In the group, 113 (81.88%) were discharged after healing; morbidity and mortality were observed in 21 (15.22%) and 4 (2.89%), respectively. The mean hospital stay was 2.82±1.64 days in patients with only abdominal traumaand 4.34±2.08 days in those with multiple trauma.Conclusion: Laparoscopy contributes signifiantly to the diagnosis and treatment of selected patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANLIÖZ, M., EKİCİ, U. (2019). Role of laparoscopy procedure in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic acute abdomen: Original article. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 41–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/345168

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Siegel JH, Smith JA. Multiple Trauma. In: Sayek İ, translation editor. Temel Cerrahi. 4th ed. Ankara: Nobel Kitabevi; 2013. p. 383–406
  2. Iacobellis F, Ierardi AM, Mazzei MA, Magenta Biasina A, Carrafillo G, Nicola R, et al. Dual-phase CT for the assessment of acute vascular injuries in high-energy blunt trauma: the imaging fidings and management implications. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150952
  3. Stewart IJ, Faulk TI, Sosnov JA, Clemens MS, Elterman J, Ross JD, et al. Rhabdomyolysis among critically ill combat casualties: Associations with acute kidney injury and mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;80:492–8
  4. Kleanthis A, Mouravas V, Lampropoulos V, Babatseva E, Spyridakis I. Laparoscopic evaluation and management of isolated gastric rupture in a boy after blunt abdominal injury. Pan Afr Med J 2017;27:173
  5. Caruso C, La Torre M, Benini B, Catani M, Crafa F, De Leo A, et al. Is laparoscopy safe and effective in nontraumatic acute abdomen? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:589– 93
  6. Perri SG, Altilia F, Pietrangeli F, Dalla Torre A, Gabbrielli F, Amendolara M, et al. Laparoscopy in abdominal emergencies. Indications and limitations. [Article in Italian]. Chir Ital 2002;54:165–78
  7. Lee KB, Wong SK. Emergency laparoscopic surgery-the Changi General Hospital experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002;31:155–7
  8. Cherry-Bukowiec JR, Miller BS, Doherty GM, Brunsvold ME, Hemmila MR, Park PK, et al. Nontrauma emergency surgery: optimal case mix for general surgery and acute care surgery training. J Trauma 2011;71:1422–6
  9. Pucher PH, Carter NC, Knight BC, Toh S, Tucker V, Mercer SJ. Impact of laparoscopic approach in emergency major abdominal surgery: single-centre analysis of 748 consecutive cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018;100:279–84
  10. Al-Mulhim AS, Nasser MA, Abdullah MM, Ali AM, Kaman L. Emergency laparoscopy for acute abdominal conditions: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18:599–602
  11. Agresta F, Campanile FC, Podda M, Cillara N, Pernazza G, Giaccaglia V, et al. Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years. Surg Endosc 2017;31:1785–95.