Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with a cardiovascular implantable electronic device: A single-center experience

Pages
13–17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No unexpected cardiac complications were seen in the perioperativeperiod in any of the patients.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that LC can safely be performed in patients with a CIED atexperienced centers with the appropriate perioperative management

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)with safe perioperative measures in patients with cardiac arrhythmia due to various heart diseases who hada cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED).Materials and Methods: Cases of patients with a CIED and who underwent LC between January 2012 andDecember 2016 were retrospectively evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The demographic data and the clinical, and perioperativeresults of the patients were analyzed.Results: A total of 467 patients underwent LC at Kartal Koşuyolu Higher Specialty Training and ResearchHospital’s Gastroenterology Clinic between January 2012 and December 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No unexpected cardiac complications were seen in the perioperativeperiod in any of the patients.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that LC can safely be performed in patients with a CIED atexperienced centers with the appropriate perioperative management
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)with safe perioperative measures in patients with cardiac arrhythmia due to various heart diseases who hada cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED).Materials and Methods: Cases of patients with a CIED and who underwent LC between January 2012 andDecember 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The demographic data and the clinical, and perioperativeresults of the patients were analyzed.Results: A total of 467 patients underwent LC at Kartal Koşuyolu Higher Specialty Training and ResearchHospital’s Gastroenterology Clinic between January 2012 and December 2016. Eight (0.017%) patients hada CIED. One (12.5%) of these patients was male, and 7 (87.5%) were female. The mean age of the patientswas 53.2 years (range: 28–82 years). All of the patients were taken into surgery as a result of symptomaticcholelithiasis. Five patients had a dual-chamber rate-modulated pacing pacemaker, while 3 patients had animplantable cardioverter/defirillator. No unexpected cardiac complications were seen in the perioperativeperiod in any of the patients.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that LC can safely be performed in patients with a CIED atexperienced centers with the appropriate perioperative management

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, D. A., ÇİYİLTEPE, H., GÜNDEŞ, E., ADAY, U., BOZDAĞ, E. G., UZUN, O., CUMHUR, K. D., DUMAN, M. (2018). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with a cardiovascular implantable electronic device: A single-center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/345156

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, et al. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991
  2. 385–7. [CrossRef] 2. Alper A, Emre A, Bilge O, Gençosmanoğlu R, Acarlı K, Arıoğul O. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The results of 200 cases. Turk J Surg 1994
  3. 248–53. 3. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new ‘gold standard’? Arch Surg 1992
  4. 917–21. [CrossRef] 4. [No authors listed] National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993
  5. 390–8. 5. Mirowski M, Reid PR, Mower MM, Watkins L, Gott VL, Schauble JF, et al. Termination of malignant ventricular arrhythmias with an implanted automatic defirillator in human beings. N Engl J Med 1980
  6. 322–4. [CrossRef] 6. Healey JS, Merchant R, Simpson C, Tang T, Beardsall M, Tung S, et al
  7. Canadian Cardiovascular Society
  8. Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society
  9. Canadian Heart Rhythm Society. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemakers, defirillators, and neurostimulating devices. Can J Cardiol 2012
  10. 141–51. [CrossRef] 7. Crossley GH, Poole JE, Rozner MA, Asirvatham SJ, Cheng A, Chung MK, et al. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defirillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Heart Rhythm 2011
  11. 1114–54. [CrossRef] 8. Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleischmann KE, et al
  12. American College of Cardiology
  13. American Heart Association. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery- -executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002
  14. 542–53. [CrossRef] 9. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Anker S, Bøtker HE, Hert SD, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on n