SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION OF CONTAINER TERMINALS LOCATED IN AEGEAN REGION OF TURKEY

TÜRKİYE'NİN EGE BÖLGESİNDEKİ KONTEYNER TERMİNALLERİNİN TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNE ENTEGRASYONU

ERCAN KURTULUŞ
ÇİMEN KARATAŞ ÇETİN
DURMUŞ ALİ DEVECİ
Pages
159–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate the two privately owned container terminals are more closely integrated with the supply chain than the publicly owned container terminal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the new competitive environment of maritime business, a need for evaluating supply chain integration of ports has emerged.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results indicate the two privately owned container terminals are more closely integrated with the supply chain than the publicly owned container terminal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, multimodal connections and systems of the two privately owned container terminals are less supply chain integrated than the publicly owned container terminals since the former lack adequate rail and road connections.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the new competitive environment of maritime business, a need for evaluating supply chain integration of ports has emerged. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the supply chain integration of three container terminals located in the Aegean Region of Turkey. We have developed a model consisting of four constructs: "relationship with users", "information and communication systems", "value added services" and "multimodal connections and systems". We have also conducted a questionnaire through the shipping companies which use the container terminals and tested the validity by means of performing Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The results indicate the two privately owned container terminals are more closely integrated with the supply chain than the publicly owned container terminal. On the other hand, multimodal connections and systems of the two privately owned container terminals are less supply chain integrated than the publicly owned container terminals since the former lack adequate rail and road connections.

Özet

Denizcilik işletmelerinin yeni rekabetçi çevresi limanların tedarik zinciri entegrasyonlarını değerlendirme ihtiyaçlarını doğurmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye'nin Ege Bölgesinde bulunan üç konteyner terminalinin tedarik zincirlerine entegrasyonlarını değerlendirmektir. Bunun için dört yapıdan oluşan bir model geliştirdik: "kullanıcılar ile ilişkiler"; "bilgi ve iletişim sistemleri"; "katma değerli hizmetler" ve "çoklu ulaşım bağlantıları ve sistemleri". Buna ek olarak konteyner terminallerini kullanan denizcilik isletmelerine anket uyguladık ve bu uygulamanın geçerliliğini Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile test ettik. Çalışmanın sonuçları göstermektedir ki iki özel konteyner terminali tedarik zincirlerine devlet tarafından işletilen konteyner terminalinden daha fazla entegredir. Öte yandan, devlet tarafından işletilen konteyner terminalinin "çoklu ulaşım bağlantıları ve sistemleri" iki özel konteyner terminalinden, yeterli demiryolu ve kara yolu bağlantılarına sahip olmadıkları için, daha fazla tedarik zincirine entegredir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURTULUŞ, E., ÇETİN, Ç. K., DEVECİ, D. A. (2016). SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION OF CONTAINER TERMINALS LOCATED IN AEGEAN REGION OF TURKEY. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 159–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/152734

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Amato, F., Fiorini, M., Gallone, S. and Golino, G. (2011). E-navigation and future trend in navigation, TransNav International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 5(1), 11-14.
  2. Carbone, V. and Martino, M. D. (2003). The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis, Maritime Policy & Management, 30(4), 305-320.
  3. Christopher, M. (2010). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall. Denktaş Şakar, G. D. and Deveci, D. A. (2012). Intermodal transportprientation of ports: A focus group study. In: Proceedings of WCTRS Sig 2 Key Developments in the Port and Maritime Sector - University of Antwerp. Antwerp, Belgium. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. (2010).
  4. Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River. Hassall, K., Welsh, K. and Qi, M. (2011). The beginnings of national eFreight portals in Australia, Asia and Europe, International Journal of EBusiness Management, 5(1), 33-47.
  5. Heaver, T., Meersman, H., Moglia, F. and Van De Voorde, E. (2000). Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?, Maritime Policy & Management, 27(4), 363-373.
  6. Hoshino, H. (2010). Competition and collaboration among container ports., Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 26 (1), 31-47.
  7. Lam, J. S. L. and van de Voorde, E. (2011). Scenario analysis for supply chain integration in container shipping, Maritime Policy & Management, 38(7), 705-725.
  8. Lam, J. S. L. and Yap, W. Y. (2011). Container port competition and complementarity in supply chain systems: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta, Maritime Economics & Logistics,13(2), 102-120.
  9. Mangan, J., Lalwani, C. and Fynes, B. (2008).
  10. Port-centric logistics, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(1), 29-41.
  11. Ng, A. S.-F., Sun, D. and Bhattacharjya, J. (2013). Port choice of shipping lines and shippers in Australia. Asian Geographer, 30 (2), 1-26.
  12. Notteboom, T. E. and Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?, Maritime Policy & Management, 28(1), 71-89.
  13. Notteboom, T. E. and Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(3), 297- 313. Oral, E. Z., Kişi, H., Cerit, A. G.,Tuna, O. and Esmer, S. (2006). Port Governance in Turkey, in M. Brooks and K. Cullinane (Eds.), Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance, pp.