SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

An Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Readiness for Self-Directed Learning

Öğretmen Adaylarının Kendi Kendine Öğrenmeye İlişkin Hazırbulunuşluklarının İncelenmesi

RAMAZAN ÖZBEK
MEHMET EROĞLU
VİLDAN DONMUŞ KAYA
Pages
17–35
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that teacher candidates’ desire for learning varied according to their average daily study time

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the readiness of teacher candidates regarding self-directed learning (RSDL) according to some variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of this study includes 436 students from different departments of Faculty of Education at Firat University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that teacher candidates’ desire for learning varied according to their average daily study time
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the readiness of teacher candidates regarding self-directed learning (RSDL) according to some variables. The study design is based on survey research. The sample of this study includes 436 students from different departments of Faculty of Education at Firat University. The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS), which was developed by Fisher, King and Tague (2001) and adapted to Turkish by Salas (2010), was used to gather data. It was determined that the RSDL of teacher candidates was generally high, and the RSDL of female teacher candidates was higher than the RSDL of male teacher candidates. Although the RSDL of teacher candidates was not differentiated according to grade level, it was differentiated according to departments that teacher candidates attended. It was determined that teacher candidates’ desire for learning varied according to their average daily study time

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının kendi kendine öğrenmeye ilişkin hazırbulunuşluk (KKÖH) düzeylerini bazı değişkenler açısından incelemektir. Araştırma, tarama (survey) modelindedir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2013-2014 akademik yılında Fırat Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinin farklı bölümlerine devam eden 436 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, Fisher, King ve Tague (2001) tarafından geliştirilen ve Salas (2010) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan KKÖHÖ ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının genel olarak KKÖH düzeylerinin yüksek olduğu, kadın öğretmen adaylarının ise KKÖH düzeylerinin erkek öğretmen adaylarından daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında öğretmen adaylarının KKÖH düzeyleri sınıf düzeyine göre değişmezken, okudukları bölüme göre farklılık göstermektedir. Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme isteklerinin ortalama günlük ders çalışma süresine göre farklılaştığı belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBEK, R., EROĞLU, M., KAYA, V. D. (2017). An Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Readiness for Self-Directed Learning. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 17–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/339693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akpınar, B. (2010). Yapılandırmacı yaklaşımda öğretmenin, öğrencinin ve velinin rolü. Eğitime Bakış 16, 16-20.
  2. Andruske, C. L. (2000). Self-directed learning as a political act: Learning projects of women on welfare. 14 Haziran 2016 tarihinde http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2142&context=aerc adresinden indirilmiştir. Aydede, M.N., Kesercioğlu, T. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik kendi kendine öğrenme becerileri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 3(36), 53-61.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freedman and Company. Bartlett, J. E. (1999). Analysis of self directed learning in secondary business educators. Doktora tezi, Louisiana State Üniversitesi,
  4. Pensilvanya Bary, R., & Rees, M. (2006). Is (self-directed) learning the key skill for tomorrow's engineers?. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 73-81.
  5. Beswick, D. M., Chuprina, L., Canipe, J. B., & Cox, B. (2002). Investigating Self-Directed Learning in Culture, Learning Styles, and Creativity. Araştırma raporu, 15 haziran 2016 tarihinde http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED473804.pdf adresinden alınmıştır. Brockett, R. G. (1984). Self-directed learning readiness and life satisfaction among older adults. University Microfilms. Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. London: Routledge. Brookfield, S. (1993). Self-directed learning, political clarity, and the critical practice of adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(4), 227-242.
  6. Caffarella, R. S. (2000). Goals of self-learning. Conceptions of self-directed learning: Theoretical and conceptual considerations, 37-48.
  7. Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile nicel veri analizi(1. baskı). Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Carter, M. (2004). Strong value of self-directed learning in the workplace: How supervisors and learners gain leaps in learning. 10.10.2016 tarihinde http://www.popline.org/node/196005 adresinden alınmıştır. Cazan, A. M., & Schiopca, B. A. (2014). Self-directed learning, personality traits and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 640-644.
  9. Chou, P. N. (2012). The relationship between engineering students’ self-directed learning abilities and online learning performances: A pilot study. Contemporary Iss