Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 40

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN DETERMINANTS OF FAMILY LIFE, MARITAL QUALITY AND MARITAL HAPPINESS

Pages
358–379
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, women reported more marital disagreement, a more unilateral view of decision-making, and higher risk of dissolution than men.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Marital satisfaction and happiness refer to subjective evaluations of positive effect in the marital relationship by one or both spouses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nevertheless, societal norms suggest that the quality of marriage significantly impacts women’s happiness than that of men.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, women reported more marital disagreement, a more unilateral view of decision-making, and higher risk of dissolution than men.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Marital satisfaction and happiness refer to subjective evaluations of positive effect in the marital relationship by one or both spouses. For most married people in modern societies, the quality of their marriages strongly affects their happiness. Nevertheless, societal norms suggest that the quality of marriage significantly impacts women’s happiness than that of men. Spouses’ different characteristics, traditional family behaviors, decision making, division of household labor, equality in family relations, and so on are parameters related to women’s and men’s views of marital quality and marital happiness. This study investigates the general attitudes of married individuals by gender toward family life includes non-marital sex, traditional family behaviors, and importance of autonomy and equality and marital quality includes marital disagreement, marital unfairness, decision making, chance of dissolution to measure the effect of these parameters on marital happiness. Participants comprised married employees in Ankara, Turkey. Sample size was determined by random sampling method (n = 305). 59.7% of the sample were men; 40.3% were women. The average age of the men was 40.3 (SD = 8.05) and that of women was 37.2 (SD = 7.39). Questionnaires assessed participants’ attitudes toward family life, marital quality, and marital happiness using scales drawn from previous studies related to family life, marital quality and marital happiness. According to the results, women reported more marital disagreement, a more unilateral view of decision-making, and higher risk of dissolution than men. The highest levels of marital happiness were experienced with briefer length of marriage, beginning and contracting life stages, more progressive attitudes about non-marital sex, less disagreement and more fairness, and low chance of dissolution.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOPUR, Z., GÜREL, B. (2020). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN DETERMINANTS OF FAMILY LIFE, MARITAL QUALITY AND MARITAL HAPPINESS. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 40, 358–379. https://ajindex.com/articles/339174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Acker, J. (1992). “From sex roles to gendered institutions.” Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565-569.
  2. Adana, F., Arslanbaş, H., Ergin, F., Biçer, N., Kıranşal, N. & Şahin, S. (2011). “Views of male university students about social gender roles: An example from East of Turkey.” Journal of Family Violence, 26 (7), 519-526.
  3. Amato, P.R. & Booth, A. (1995). “Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality.” American Sociological Review, 60, 58-66.
  4. Amato, P. R. & Booth, A. (2001). “The legacy of parents' marital discord: Consequences for children's marital quality.” Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(4), 627. Amato, P.R., Johnson, D. R., Booth, A. & Rogers, S. J. (2003). “Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1–22
  5. Arıcı, F. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinde toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin algılar ve psikolojik iyi oluş. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  6. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  7. Bartley, S. J., Blanton, P. W. & Gilliard, J. L. (2005). “Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: decision making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity.” Marriage and Family Review, 37(4), 69-94.
  8. Başaran, F. (1984). Ailede cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin tutum değişmeleri. Sosyal Bilimler Derneği Yayınları, 145-160.
  9. Baykal, S. (1988). Üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsiyet rolleri ile ilgili kalıp yargılarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  10. Beam C. R., Marcus, K., Turkheimer, E. & Emery, R. E. (2018). “Gender differences in the structure of marital quality.” Behavior Genetics, 48, 209–223.
  11. Becker, G. S. (1973). “A theory of marriage: Part I.” Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813-846.
  12. Becker, G. S. (1991).
  13. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  14. Berscheid, E. & Regan, P. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Bhasin, K. (2003). Toplumsal cinsiyet: Bize yüklenen roller. Kadınlarla Dayanışma Vakfı Yayınları. İstanbul:
  15. Kuşak Ofset. Bird, C. E. (1999). “Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amount and division of housework.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 32-45.
  16. Brooks, C. & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). “The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning.” Social Science Re