Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Pages
74–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides the definitive treatment, the exact pathological diagnosis can be ensured by LPN.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the surgical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in patients with renal angiomyolipoma (RAML).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: From April 2014 to February 2018, the data of a total of 346 patients who underwent LPN were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides the definitive treatment, the exact pathological diagnosis can be ensured by LPN.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the surgical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in patients with renal angiomyolipoma (RAML). Materials and Methods: From April 2014 to February 2018, the data of a total of 346 patients who underwent LPN were retrospectively reviewed. Twentyone patients with final pathology report indicating RAML were included in the study. Demographic data, operative indications, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes as well as complications were evaluated. Results: Eighteen female (85.7%) and 3 male (14.3%) patients were included in this study. The mean age was 55.14±11.95 years. Of the RAMLs, 52.4% were in the right kidney and 47.6% in the left kidney. The mean tumor size was 31.38±16.72 mm and the mean RENAL Nephrometry score was 5.90±1.51 (4-10). RAML could not be differentiated from RCC in 12 patients (57.1%) by preoperative computer tomography and/or magnetic resonance images. In 4 patients, LPN was implemented by off-clamp technique whereas, in 17 patients it was implemented by global ischemia technique. The mean operation duration was 67.86±20.77 (40-110) minutes (min) and the mean estimated blood loss was 117.14±59.7 (30-220) milliliters. In 17 patients who underwent LPN by global ischemia technique, the mean warm ischemia time was 10.88±5.19 (6-22) min. According to the Modified Clavien-Dindo classification, grade 1 complications were detected in 3 patients, postoperatively. The most considerable renal functional changes were detected between preoperative and postoperative- 1st day levels. However, at the end of the first year, the difference was found to decrease. Conclusion: LPN is a safe and effective treatment option for the treatment of RAMLs that are not able to be distinguished from renal cell carcinoma radiologically. Besides the definitive treatment, the exact pathological diagnosis can be ensured by LPN.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERCİMEK, M. N., ÖZDEN, E., ÖZBEK, L. M. (2020). Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 74–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/334859

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bhatt JR, Richard PO, Kim NS, et al. Natural History of Renal Angiomyolipoma (AML): Most Patients with Large AMLs >4cm Can Be Offered Active Surveillance as an Initial Management Strategy. European urology 2016;70:85-90
  2. Delhorme JB, Fontana A, Levy A, et al. Renal angiomyolipomas: At least two diseases. A series of patients treated at two European institutions. European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 2017;43:831-836
  3. Park BK. Renal Angiomyolipoma: Radiologic Classification and Imaging Features According to the Amount of Fat. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2017;209:826-835
  4. Flum AS, Hamoui N, Said MA, et al. Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma. The Journal of urology 2016;195:834-846
  5. Singh D, Rubenstein M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Journal of endourology 2005; 19:451-455; discussion 455
  6. Gill IS, Rassweiler JJ. Retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery: our approach. Urology 1999;54:734-738
  7. Levey AS, Stevens LA. Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2010;55:622-627
  8. Liu X, Ma X, Liu Q, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for large renal angiomyolipoma: Our technique and experience. A case series of 41 patients. International journal of surgery 2018;54:216-221
  9. Chronopoulos PN, Kaisidis GN, Vaiopoulos CK, et al. Spontaneous rupture of a giant renal angiomyolipoma-Wunderlich’s syndrome: Report of a case. International journal of surgery case reports 2016; 9:140-143
  10. Lienert AR, Nicol D. Renal angiomyolipoma. BJU international 2012;110 Suppl 4:25-27
  11. Cavicchioli FM, D’Elia C, Cerruto MA, et al. Giant bilateral renal angiomyolipomas: a case report. Urologia internationalis 2014;92:366-368
  12. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. European urology 2019;75:799-810
  13. Sureka B, Khera PS. Radiologic Classification and Imaging Features of Renal Angiomyolipomas According to the Amount of Fat. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2018;210:W136
  14. Mues AC, Palacios JM, Haramis G, et al. Contemporary experience in the management of angiom