Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Evaluating the Effects of Different Ischaemia Techniques on Functional Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Pages
124–129
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it was found that cumulative renal functions are better preserved when ischaemia time is reduced to ≤20 min or eliminated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of different ischaemia techniques on short-term and one year renal function following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Data of 359 patients who underwent LPN between November 2009 and April 2018 were reviewed, retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it was found that cumulative renal functions are better preserved when ischaemia time is reduced to ≤20 min or eliminated.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of different ischaemia techniques on short-term and one year renal function following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: Data of 359 patients who underwent LPN between November 2009 and April 2018 were reviewed, retrospectively. A total of 287 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to type of ischaemia as follows: group A (n=33) was warm ischaemia time (WIT) >20 minute, group B (n=202) was WIT ≤20 minute, group C (n=16) was selective arterial clamping and group D (n=36) was off-clamp. Demographic data, preoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Change in eGFR according to group and time was evaluated using two-way analysis of variance. P values 0.05) between groups. Only 4 patients in group B had positive surgical margin. The percentage of relative eGFR (% of ΔeGFR) decline 1 year after LPN was significantly (p=0.001) higher in the ischaemic groups (A and B: 9.3% and 7.5%) compared to the zero-ischaemia groups (C and D: 5% and 3.7%). Conclusion: This study revealed that after LPN, cumulative renal function decreases to a certain extent regardless of the technique. However, it was found that cumulative renal functions are better preserved when ischaemia time is reduced to ≤20 min or eliminated.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERCİMEK, M. N., ÖZDEN, E., GÜLŞEN, M., BOSTANCI, Y., YAKUPOĞLU, Y. K., SARIKAYA, Ş. (2020). Evaluating the Effects of Different Ischaemia Techniques on Functional Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 124–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/334306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol 2019;75:799-810.
  2. Marconi L, Desai MM, Ficarra V, et al. Renal Preservation and Partial Nephrectomy: Patient and Surgical Factors. European urology focus 2016;2:589-600.
  3. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2010;58:340-345.
  4. Ng AM, Shah PH, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A narrative review and comparison with open and robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2017;31:976-984.
  5. Levey AS, Stevens LA. Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;55:622-627.
  6. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-853.
  7. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-196.
  8. Singh D, Rubenstein M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2005;19:451-455.
  9. Gill IS, Rassweiler JJ. Retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery: our approach. Urology 1999;54:734-738.
  10. Yamasaki T, Tamada S, Kato M, et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging system for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Can J Urol 2018;25:9606-9613.
  11. Gill IS, Patil MB, Abreu AL, et al. Zero ischemia anatomical partial nephrectomy: a novel approach. Arab J Urol 2012;187:807-814.
  12. Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V, et al. Renal Ischemia and Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Collaborative Review of the Literature. Eur Urol 2015;68:61-74.
  13. Porpiglia F, Autorino R, Fiori C, et al. The impact of T1 renal tumor characteristics on baseline renal function in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: A renal scan based objective assessment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:1598-1602.
  14. Mir MC, Campbell RA, Sharma N, et al. Parenchymal volume preservation and ischemia during partial nephrectomy: functional and volumetric analysis. Urology 2013;82:263-268.
  15. Zabell JR, Wu J, Suk-Ouichai C, Campbell SC. Renal Ischemia and Functional Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2017;44:243-255.
  16. Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Cristian Fiori. Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impa