Journals / European Journal of Biology / 2008 / Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 1

Quantitative Microbiological Analysis of Biofilm Communities from the Surfaces of Different Cooling Tower Materials

Pages
9–16
Publication Date
2010-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be concluded that selection of the suitable pipe material could reduce waterborne disease and minimize the possibility of biofilm development associated with the operation of cooling tower systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biofilms are complex communities of microorganisms attached to surfaces or associated with interfaces.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since biofilm formation is influenced by the type of surface materials, in the current study it was aimed to compare copper, stainless steel, galvanized stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene, polypropylene, ceramic and glass surfaces for biofilm formation rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be concluded that selection of the suitable pipe material could reduce waterborne disease and minimize the possibility of biofilm development associated with the operation of cooling tower systems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Biofilms are complex communities of microorganisms attached to surfaces or associated with interfaces. Since biofilm formation is influenced by the type of surface materials, in the current study it was aimed to compare copper, stainless steel, galvanized stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene, polypropylene, ceramic and glass surfaces for biofilm formation rate. In this study, both monthly collected water and biofilm samples were analyzed in terms of total coliforms, faecal coliforms, Pseudomonas, aerobic mesophilic heterotrophic bacteria (at 22 and 37°C) and amoebas. We found that plastic polymers, especially polyethylene and polypropylene, supported the lowest total aerobic mesophilic heterotrophic bacterial numbers. Although the protozoa (amoeba) could found on to all of the surfaces, Pseudomonas species could harbour none of them. It can be concluded that selection of the suitable pipe material could reduce waterborne disease and minimize the possibility of biofilm development associated with the operation of cooling tower systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, A. K., SANLİ-YÜRÜDÜ, N. O., ARSLAN-AYDOĞDU, E. Ö., DOGRUOZ, N., ZEYBEK, Z., TÜRETGEN, İ., COTUK, A. (2010). Quantitative Microbiological Analysis of Biofilm Communities from the Surfaces of Different Cooling Tower Materials. European Journal of Biology, Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 1, 9–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/33339

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. APHA. (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th edn. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, Water Environment Federation. Beech I.B. and Gaylarde C.C. (1999) Recent advances in the study of biocorrosion-an overview. Revista de Microbiologia, 30 (3): 177-190.
  2. Bloomfield S.F., Arthur M., Begun K. and Patel H. (1993) Comparative testing of disinfectants using proposed European surface test methods. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 10: 287-294.
  3. Boe-Hansen R., Albrechtsen H.J., Arvin E., Jorgensen C. (2002) Bulk water phase and biofilm growth in drinking water at low nutrient conditions, Water Research, 36: 4477-4486.
  4. Costerton J.W. (1999) Introduction to biofilm. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 11: 217-221.
  5. Cotuk A., Dogruoz N., Zeybek Z., Kimiran-Erdem A., Ilhan-Sungur E. (2005) The effect of Pseudomonas and Aeromonas strains on Legionella pneumophila growth, Annals of Microbiology, 55 (3), 219-224.
  6. Donnell M.J.O, Tuttlebee C.M., Falkiner F.R., Coleman D.C. (2004) Bacterial contamination of dental chair units in a modern dental hospital caused by leakage from suction system hoses containing extensive biofilm. Journal of Hospital Infection, 59 (4): 348-360
  7. Gagnon G.A. and Slawson R.M. (1999) An efficient biofilm removal method for bacterial cells exposed to drinking water. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 34: 203-214.
  8. Jeong J. and Yu H.S. (2005) The role of domestic tap water in Acanthamoeba contamination in contact lens storage cases in Korea. The Korean Journal of Parasitology, 43: 47-50.
  9. Lechevallier M.W., Cawthon C.D., Lee R.G. (1988) Factors promoting survival of bacteria in chlorinated water supplies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 54 (3): 649-654.
  10. Momba M.N.B. and Binda M.A. (2002) Combining chlorination and chloramination processes for the inhibition of biofilm formation in drinking surface water system models. Jornal of Applied Microbiology, 92: 641-648.
  11. Momba M.N.B and Makala N. (2004) Comparing the effect of various pipe materials on biofilm formation in chlorinated and combined chlorine-chloraminated water systems. Water SA, 30 (2): 175-182.
  12. Pasmore M., Todd P., Pfeifer B., Rhodes M. and Bowman C.N. (2002) Effect of polymer surface properties on the reversibility of attachment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the early stages of biofilm development. Biofouling, 18, 65-71.
  13. Percival S.L., Knapp J.S., Edyvean R.G.J. and Wales D.S. (1998). Biofilm, ma