Journals / IUFS Journal of Biology / 2009 / Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 1

Microbiological investigation of bottled waters from different suppliers in Istanbul

Pages
37–45
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the results of the present study have revealed that it is very important to ensure systematic microbiological monitoring and the control of bottled water which is used as drinking water.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Some pathogenic bacteria found in drinking water may cause infections in many countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study 88 samples of bottled drinking water belonging to 22 different brands were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the results of the present study have revealed that it is very important to ensure systematic microbiological monitoring and the control of bottled water which is used as drinking water.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:88 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Some pathogenic bacteria found in drinking water may cause infections in many countries. The control of these infections is done by water treatment. It's very important to monitor faecal indicator bacteria such as faecal and total coliform in terms of the examination of the bacteriological quality of drinking water. In addition, the determination of total mesophilic aerobic bacteria is also used in measureing bacterial pollution. In our study 88 samples of bottled drinking water belonging to 22 different brands were examined. The water samples that were taken from plastic bottles of 19 L were examined for faecal coliform, total coliform, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas spp., total mesophilic aerobic bacteria, and presence of free-living amoeba. Faecal coliform, total coliform, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas spp., and the existence of free-living amoeba were determined by membrane filtration; and the total mesophilic aerobic bacteria numbers were studied using the pour plate method. It has been found that all of the samples examined in this study are not acceptable according to the standards of TSE and WHO. Although four different water samples were taken from the same brand, it has been shown that their were variations in the bacteriological quality of the water, from one water sample to another. Reusable methods of cleaning the bottles and the unhealthy conditions of filling facilities might cause these differences. In conclusion, the results of the present study have revealed that it is very important to ensure systematic microbiological monitoring and the control of bottled water which is used as drinking water. Also this control should be done by authorized foundations.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRUÖZ, N., ÇOTUK, A., ERDEM, A. K., GÜRÜN, S., ZEYBEK, Z. (2022). Microbiological investigation of bottled waters from different suppliers in Istanbul. IUFS Journal of Biology, Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 1, 37–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/544058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agaoglu S., Ekinci K., Alemdar S. and Dede S. (1999) Van ve yöresi kaynak sularının mikrobiyolojik, fiziksel ve kimyasal kaliteleri üzerine araştırmalar, Van Tıp Dergisi, 6 (2): 30-33.
  2. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th Edition,
  3. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, Water Environment Federation. Ashbolt N.J. (2004) Microbial contamination of drinking water and disease outcomes in developing regions. Toxicology, 198: 229-238.
  4. Avci S., Bakici M.Z. and Erandac M. (2006) Tokat ilindeki içme sularının koliform grubu bakteriler yönünden araştırılması.C.Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(4): 107-112.
  5. Bailey I. and Archer L. (1997) The relationship between water quality and public health in developing countries: health impact and economic assessment from the provision of rural water supply in South Africa. Proceedings of the 1st World Water Congress of International Water Association (IWA), Health-Related Water Microbiology, Conference Reprint, 7, 3-7
  6. July, Paris. Bartram J., Cotruvo J., Exner M., Fricker C. and Glasmacher A. (2004) Heterotrophic plate count measurement in drinking water safety managements. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 92: 241-247.
  7. Burke V., Robinson J., Gracey M., Petersen D. and Partridge K. (1984) Isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila from a metropolitan water supply: seasonal correlation with clinical isolates. Applied Environment Microbiology, 48: 361-366.
  8. Donnell M.J.O., Tuttlebee C.M., Falkiner F.R. and Coleman D.C. (2005) Bacterial contamination of dental chair units in a modern dental hospital caused by leakage from suction system hoses containing extensive biofilm. Journal of Hospital Infection, 59 (4): 348-360. Harf C. (1993/94) Free-living amoeba: interactions with environmental pathogenic bacteria. Endocytobiosis and Cell Research, 10: 167-183.
  9. Jeena M.I., Deepa P., Mujeeb Rahiman K.M., Shanthi R.T. and Hatha A.A.M. (2006) Risk assessment of heterotrophic bacteria from bottled drinking water sold in Indian markets. International Journal of Hygiene Environmental Health, 209: 191-196.
  10. Jeong J. and Yu H.S. (2005) The role of domestic tap water in Acanthamoeba contamination in contact lens storage cases in Korea. The Korean Journal of Parasitology, 43:47-50.
  11. Kassenga G.R. (2007) The health-related, microbiological quality of bottled drinking water sold in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Water and Health, 15(1): 179-185.
  12. Kivanc M., Kunduho