Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2008 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Urethral reconstruction in cases with re-do and/or primary severe urethral defects: the use of local skin flaps and buccal mucosa

Pages
231–236
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Buccal mucosa may be a good choice in re-do and/or circumcised primary adult cases with severe proximal hypospadias with chordee that do not have adequate local skin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The difficulties of urethral reconstruction in adults with re-do and/or circumcised peno- scrotal hypospadias with chordee are well known by all urologists.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Thirty-two of 126 patients who applied urology clinics because of their urethral defects between the years 1994 and 2007 were adults with re-do and/or circumcised severe proximal hypospadias with chordee.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Buccal mucosa may be a good choice in re-do and/or circumcised primary adult cases with severe proximal hypospadias with chordee that do not have adequate local skin.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Üretra darlığı · Penis · Ürogenital cerrahi prosedürler

Abstract

Introduction: The difficulties of urethral reconstruction in adults with re-do and/or circumcised peno- scrotal hypospadias with chordee are well known by all urologists. For this reason, our aim was to discuss urethral reconstruction techniques used in our operations and the difficulties we encountered. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two of 126 patients who applied urology clinics because of their urethral defects between the years 1994 and 2007 were adults with re-do and/or circumcised severe proximal hypospadias with chordee. For urethral reconstruction, we used local skin in 20 cases, buccal mucosa in 10, and local skin combined with buccal mucosa in 2. Mean follow up was 23 months (3-96 months). Results: In the local skin group, urethral fistula occurred in 4 (4/20) patients. In the buccal mucosa group, 6 (6/10) patients developed anastomotic stenosis and 5 of them developed small fistulas. After internal urethrotomy and fistula repair, functional urethras with desired lengths and diameters were obtained. One (1/2) fistula developed in local skin combined with buccal mucosa group. Conclusion: In order to provide a good penile orthoplasty and stricture prophylaxis, it is essential that the urethral bed is cleared of all of fibrotic tissues, and that the proximal urethral end be excised up to the level of best perfusion. Circular penile fasciocutaneous flaps rather than scrotal skin flaps should be used for anterior urethral reconstruction. The urethral plate should be secured as far as possible, and patch flaps rather than tube flaps should be used. Buccal mucosa may be a good choice in re-do and/or circumcised primary adult cases with severe proximal hypospadias with chordee that do not have adequate local skin.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALBAYRAK, S., CANGÜVEN, Ö., GÖKTAŞ, C., HORUZ, R., ÇETİNEL, C., YALÇIN, S. (2008). Urethral reconstruction in cases with re-do and/or primary severe urethral defects: the use of local skin flaps and buccal mucosa. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 231–236. https://ajindex.com/articles/328230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Secrest CL, Jordan GH, Winslow BH, et al: Repair of the complications of hypospadias surgery. J Urol. 150: 1415-1418, 1993
  2. Wessells H, Morey AF, McAninch JW: Single stage reconstruction of complex anterior urethral strictures: Combined tissue transfer techniques. J Urol. 157: 1271- 1274, 1997
  3. Amukele SA, Stock JA, Hanna MK: Management and outcome of complex hypospadias repairs. J Urol. 174: 1540-1542; discussion 1542-1543, 2005
  4. Morey AF, McAninch JW: Technique of harvesting buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 155: 1696-1697, 1996
  5. Morey AF, Duckett CP, McAninch JW: Failed anterior urethroplasty: Guidelines for reconstruction. J Urol. 158: 1383-1387, 1997
  6. Wessells H, McAninch JW: Use of free grafts in ureth- ral stricture reconstruction. J Urol. 155: 1912-1915, 1996
  7. Caldamone AA, Edstrom LE, Koyle MA, et al: Buccal mucosal grafts for urethral reconstruction. Urology. 51: 15-19, 1998
  8. Duckett JW, Coplen D, Ewalt D, et al: Buccal mucosal urethral replacement. J Urol. 153: 1660-1663, 1995
  9. El-Kasaby AW, Fath-Alla M, Noweir AM, et al: The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol. 149: 276-278, 1993
  10. Hensle TW, Kearney MC, Bingham JB: Buccal muco- sa grafts for hypospadias surgery: Long-term results. J Urol. 168: 1734-1736; discussion 1736-1737, 2002
  11. Lopez JA, Valle J, Timon A, et al: Use of autologous buccal mucosal graft for urethral surgery in males. Eur Urol. 29: 227-230, 1996.