Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2013 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Subinguinal mikrocerrahi tekniği ile yapılan varikoselektomi de titanyum klipslerin kullanımı

The use of titanium ligation clips in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy

Pages
29–34
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Titanium ligation clips can be used for the ligation of dilated vessels during microsurgical subin- guinal varicocelectomy, and the operation time is significantly reduced with the use of titanium ligation clips.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of titanium ligation clips for dilated spermatic veins in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1 included 43 patients; these patients underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with the titanium clips.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Titanium ligation clips can be used for the ligation of dilated vessels during microsurgical subin- guinal varicocelectomy, and the operation time is significantly reduced with the use of titanium ligation clips.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of titanium ligation clips for dilated spermatic veins in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. Material and methods: In this retrospective study, eighty-four men with clinical varicocele underwent mi- crosurgical varicocele repair. The patients were divided into two groups according to the ligation materials used for the varicocelectomy (silk sutures vs. titanium clips). Group 1 included 43 patients; these patients underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with the titanium clips. The 41 patients included in Group 2 underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with silk sutures. Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy was performed in all patients. The two study groups were compared in terms of intra- operative and postoperative parameters. Results: The mean age of the patients was 28.6±4.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 12.3±2.7 months. The two groups exhibited comparable improvements in sperm motility and/or concentration: 79.1% and 82.9% in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p>0.05). The operation time in Group 1 (titanium clip) was sig- nificantly shorter than in Group 2 (silk sutures). None of the patients experienced any intra-operative com- plications. There were no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 with regard to postoperative recurrences, ligated veins, postoperative complications and hydrocele formation, hospitalization time, the requirement for postoperative analgesia or the time until the patient could return to work. Conclusion: Titanium ligation clips can be used for the ligation of dilated vessels during microsurgical subin- guinal varicocelectomy, and the operation time is significantly reduced with the use of titanium ligation clips.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı subinguinal mikrocerrahi varikoselektomide dilate venlerin bağlanmasında tita- nium klipslerinin kullanımının değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve yöntemler: Retrospektif olarak yürütülen bu çalışmaya, mikrocerrahi varikoselektomi yapılan 84 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalar kullanılan ligasyon materyaline göre iki gruba ayrıldı. (ipek sütür ve titanyum klips) Grup 1’deki 43 hastada titanium klips ile Grup 2’deki 41 hastada ipek sütür ile dilate venler varikose- lektomi sırasında bağlandı. Tüm hastalara subinguinal mikrocerrahi varikoselektomi yapıldı. Her iki gruptaki hastalar intra-operatif ve post-operatif parametreler açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 28.6±4.6 ve ortalama takip süresi 12.3±2.7 ay olarak belirlendi. Sperm motilite ve konsantrasyonunda ki düzelme grup 1 de % 79.1 iken Grup 2’de %82.9 olarak ortaya çıktı (p>0.05). Operasyon süresi Grup 1’de (titanium klips) Grup 2’ ye (ipek suture) göre belirgin olarak daha kısa saptan- dı. Hastaların hiçbirinde intraoperatif komplikasyon gelişmedi. Her iki grup arasında postoperatif rekürrens, bağlanan ven sayısı, postoperatif komplikasyon, hidrosel gelişimi, hastanede kalış süresi, postoperatif analjezi ihtiyacı ve işe dönüş süresi açısından fark saptanmadı. Sonuç: Titanyum klipsler subinguinal mikrocerrahi varikoselektomi sırasında dilate damarların bağlanması için kullanılabilir. Operasyon süresi titanyum klisp kullanımı ile belirgin olarak azaltılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAÇ, M., TUNÇ, L., DENİZ, N., BİRİ, H. (2013). Subinguinal mikrocerrahi tekniği ile yapılan varikoselektomi de titanyum klipslerin kullanımı. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 29–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/328002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 2003
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Cayan S, Acar D, Ulger S, Akbay E. Adolescent varicocele repair: long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital. J Urol 2005
  3. [CrossRef] 3. May M, Johannsen M, Beutner S, Helke C, Braun KP, Lein M, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy: retrospective comparison of two different approaches of varicocele treatment. Eur Urol 2006
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Ghanem H, Anis T, El-Nashar A, Shamloul R. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome. Urology 2004
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Zini A, Fischer A, Bellack D, Noss M, Kamal K, Chow V, et al. Technical modifications of microsurgical varicocelectomy can reduce operating time. Urology 2006
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Matthews GJ, Matthews ED, Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril 1998
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993
  8. Fine RG, Poppas DP. Varicocele: standard and alternative indications for repair. Curr Opin Urol 2012
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Tauber R, Johnsen N. Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele: technique and late results. J Urol 1994
  10. Iaccarino V. A nonsurgical treatment of varicocele: transcatheter sclerotherapy of gonadal veins. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1980
  11. Abdel-Maguid AF, Othman I. Microsurgical and nonmagnified subinguinal varicocelectomy for infertile men: a comparative study. Fertil Steril 2010
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Kim ED, Leibman BB, Grinblat DM, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol 1999
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Dohle G, et al:European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol 2012
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Lee SW, Lee JY, Kim KH, Ha US. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation in men with palpable varicocele: a