Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2014 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

Fibrous pseudotumors of the testis: The balance between sparing the testis and preoperative diagnostic difculty

Pages
125–129
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: If scrotal tumors are detected by ultrasonography in patients with normal tumor markers, and the tumor cannot be clear distinguished from the testis, these patients might have a fbrous pseudotumor, and organ-sparing surgery can be performed on these patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine a paradigm that will be helpful for urologists to manage fbrous pseudotumors, which are a very rare condition of the testis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients with fbrous pseudotumors in our uropathological database from 1995 to 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: If scrotal tumors are detected by ultrasonography in patients with normal tumor markers, and the tumor cannot be clear distinguished from the testis, these patients might have a fbrous pseudotumor, and organ-sparing surgery can be performed on these patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine a paradigm that will be helpful for urologists to manage fbrous pseudotumors, which are a very rare condition of the testis. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients with fbrous pseudotumors in our uropathological database from 1995 to 2013. Patients who had tumor markers and ultrosonography (USG) screening before surgery and a fnal pathology report of a fbrous pseudotumor were included in the study. Results: In total, 838 patients with a testis mass were evaluated. Only 6 of these patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 34 years (min: 20, max: 72). Serum tumor markers were in the normal range for all patients. The scrotal tumors were not clearly related to the testis parenchyma, and the radiologists could not defnitively determine the nature of the masses (benign or malignant). A concomitant hydrocele was detected in 2 patients. After inguinal exploration, radical orchiectomy was performed in one patient with an ipsilateral atrophic testis, and biopsies were taken from the lesions for frozen section analysis in the other 5 patients. Pathologists reported benign tumors for all of these patients based on the frozen sections, and testicular sparing surgery was then performed in these 5 patients. Conclusion: If scrotal tumors are detected by ultrasonography in patients with normal tumor markers, and the tumor cannot be clear distinguished from the testis, these patients might have a fbrous pseudotumor, and organ-sparing surgery can be performed on these patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞAL, Ş., MALKOÇ, E., AYDUR, E., YILDIRIM, İ., KİBAR, Y., KURT, B., GÖKTAŞ, S. (2014). Fibrous pseudotumors of the testis: The balance between sparing the testis and preoperative diagnostic difculty. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 125–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/327990

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Seethala RR, Tirkes AT, Weinstein S, Tomaszewski JE, Malkowicz SB, Genega EM. Diffuse fibrous pseudotumor of the testicular tunics associated with an inflamed hydrocele. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:742-4
  2. Williams G, Banerjee R. Paratesticular tumours. Br J Urol 1969;41:332-9. [CrossRef] 3. Polsky EG, Ray C, Dubilier LD. Diffuse fibrous pseudotumor of the tunica vaginalis testis, epididymis and spermatic cord. J Urol 2004;171:1625-6. [CrossRef] 4. Elem B, Patil PS, Lambert TK. Giant fibrous pseudotumor of the testicular tunics in association with Schistosoma haematobium infection. J Urol 1989;141:376-7
  3. Rubenstein RA, Dogra VS, Seftel AD, Resnick MI. Benign intrascrotal lesions. J Urol 2004;171:1765-72. [CrossRef] 6. Mikuz G, Damjanov I. Inflammation of the testis, epididymis, peritesticular membranes, and scrotum. Pathol Annu 1982;17:101-28
  4. Tobias-machado M, Corrêa Lopes Neto A, Heloisa Simardi L, Borrelli M, Wroclawski ER. Fibrous pseudotumor of tunica vaginalis and epididymis. Urology 2000;56:670-2. [CrossRef] 8. Orland MS, Schlecker BA, Wein AJ. Benign diseases the testicle and para testicular tissues. AUA Update Series 1986;5:1-7
  5. Parker PM, Pugliese JM, Allen RC Jr. Benign fibrous pseudotumor of tunica vaginalis testis. Urology 2006;68:427.e17-9
  6. Sönmez K, Türkyilmaz Z, Boyacioğlu M, Edali MN, Ozen O, Başaklar AC, et al. Diffuse fibrous proliferation of tunica vaginalis associated with testicular infarction: a case report. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:1057-8. [CrossRef] 11. al-Otaibi L, Whitman GJ, Chew FS. Fibrous pseudotumor of the epididymis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1586. [CrossRef] 12. Mostofi FK, Price EB. Tumors of the male genital system, in Firminger HI (Ed): Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Washington DC, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology 1973.pp.151-3
  7. Orosz Z, Besznyák I. Diffuse inflammatory pseudotumor of the testis, the epididymis and the spermatic cord. Pathol Oncol Res 1995;1:75-9. [CrossRef] 14. Mehta AL, Dogra VS. Intratesticular varicocele. J Clin Ultrasound 1998;26:49-51. [CrossRef] 15. Kutlu R, Alkan A, Soylu A, Sigirci A, Dusak A. Intratesticular arteriovenous malformation: color Doppler sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:295-8
  8. Jackson Jr. The histogenesis of the adenomatoid tumor of the genital tract. Cancer 1958;11:337-50. [CrossRef] 17. Williams SB, Han M, Jones R, Andrawis R. Adenomatoid tumor of the testes. Urology 2004;63:779-81. [CrossRef] 18. Jones MA, Young RH, Scully RE. Benign fibro